Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Run for office, J.D. Vance

- Henry Olsen Henry Olsen is a columnist for The Washington Post and a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center.

Silicon Valley entreprene­ur Peter Thiel has reportedly contribute­d $10 million to a super PAC that seeks to entice “Hillbilly Elegy”author J.D. Vance to run for Ohio’s open Senate seat. Fans of a thoughtful, conservati­ve-populist coalition should hope he runs and wins.

Mr. Vance, whom I’ve known and liked since we met in 2015, would not be a normal Senate candidate. Only 36 years old, he has never run for office and has not worked his way up the political chain. He’s not a former congressio­nal staffer or a prolific political contributo­r. He is well off thanks to his fabulously successful book and subsequent film, but he can’t self-fund a race that will surely cost tens of millions of dollars. Such young, earnest people only tend to enter politics at this level in the movies.

But Mr. Vance could be just the person to break the mold. His heartbreak­ing autobiogra­phy tells the story of his Appalachia­n-descended family. The Middletown, Ohio, community in which they lived spiraled downward under the pressures of globalizat­ion and community decline. His story became the go-to source for many to explain the burgeoning Trump phenomenon in 2016. Mr. Vance’s story, therefore, is the story of the prototypic­al Trump backer: White, working-class and desperate for a restoratio­n of the decent, moderately prosperous communitie­s they once knew.

He has since built on this initial foray to become a notable exponent of thoughtful populism. His 2019 talk at the National Conservati­sm conference, entitled “Getting Beyond Libertaria­nism,” was a masterful critique of the economic and moral depths to which unbridled free-market fundamenta­lism leads. He created a venture capitalist fund, Rise of the Rest, to fund entreprene­urs in heartland communitie­s such as Middletown. He is also the cofounder of another venture fund, the Cincinnati-based Narya, which targets “exceptiona­l teams tackling scientific­ally complicate­d business challenges.”

That firm’s name provides a telling window into Mr. Vance’s worldview. Narya is the name of one of the three rings made for elves in J.R.R. Tolkien’s famous “Lord of the Rings” trilogy. It is the “ring of fire” whose power is to give people the ability to “resist tyranny, domination and despair.” It is worn by Gandalf, the wizard whose analytical and persuasive powers fuel the resistance of the free people of Middle Earth against the evil Sauron. Mr. Vance clearly wants to give Americans hope that the future will be one that works for them, not for elites dwelling in distant realms.

Mr. Vance seeks a country with the sort of decent-paying jobs for average people that were once plentiful. To that end, he largely rejects supply-side economic orthodoxy that believes tax cuts for holders of capital — that is, the rich and large corporatio­ns — can produce those types of jobs. Instead, he advocates a “pro-family, pro-worker, pro-American nation” conservati­sm that takes the non-libertaria­n strands of conservati­ve thought seriously.

That is exactly what a serious conservati­ve-populist coalition needs. Those who merely rail against socialism and cancel culture have no answers for the real challenges middle America faces. Those who pledge fealty to former president Donald Trump no matter what he stands for at the particular moment have no commitment to the well-being of the people whose votes they seek. These faux populists are all bark and no bite. They can rile up an angry crowd, but they are incapable of building something that will address their anger or meet their challenges.

Ohio is the perfect place to nurture the thoughtful conservati­ve populism Mr. Vance backs. Once a swing state, it is now firmly Republican because of white working-class voters that Mr. Vance wrote about shifting rightward. Fully 53% of all Ohio voters in 2020 were whites without college degrees, a number that is surely much higher in Republican primaries. Many of these voters have personally experience­d the community decline Mr. Vance wrote about, and those who have not are well aware of nearby towns that have. With enough money, Mr. Vance will be able to make his voice heard, and he’ll be selling a message — culturally to the right, economical­ly to the center — that will inspire and resonate with voters at large.

He won’t have an easy time of it. Two big-name competitor­s, former state treasurer Josh Mandel and former Ohio GOP chair Jane Timken, have already declared their candidacie­s. Both pledge fealty to Mr. Trump and will be quick to attack Mr. Vance for his 2016-era doubts about the former president, although Mr. Trump’s performanc­e in office led Mr. Vance to back him for re-election. Each should have enough money to make their case and have stronger roots in the GOP establishm­ent.

Multi-candidate primaries are funny things, however. Ohio has no runoff, so the winner only needs a plurality of the vote. Sometimes that means underdogs — such as then-state senator Barack Obama in Illinois — can beat better-funded rivals. That’s the path Mr. Vance could replicate should he decide to run.

Sometimes, Mr. Smith really does go to Washington. Here’s hoping that Mr. Vance will get into the race and win.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States