Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Supreme Court rejects election challenge

Case lingered for months after others were rejected

-

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday said it will not hear a case out of Pennsylvan­ia related to the 2020 election, a case that had lingered while similar election challenges had already been rejected by the justices.

The high court directed a lower court to dismiss the case as moot.

The justices had in February, after President Joe Biden’s inaugurati­on, rejected a handful of cases related to the 2020 election. In the case the court rejected Monday, however, the court had called for additional briefing that was not complete until the end of March.

The case involved a federal court challenge to a Pennsylvan­ia Supreme Court decision requiring election officials to receive and count mailed-in ballots that arrived up to three days after the election. More broadly, however, the case concerned whether state lawmakers or state courts get the last word about the manner in which federal elections are carried out.

The Democratic National

Committee was among those that argued the case should be rejected as moot because the 2020 election is over. Those that brought the case said the justices should hear it because the issues involved are important and recurring.

The court had previously rejected other cases that had involved the Pennsylvan­ia Supreme Court’s decision to extend the deadline for mail-in ballots. Three of the court’s conservati­ve justices dissented, saying they would have taken up the cases.

The genesis of the cases was changes Pennsylvan­ia lawmakers made to the state’s election laws in response to the coronaviru­s pandemic. Despite the changes, lawmakers left in place a Nov. 3 deadline to receive absentee ballots. Democrats sued, and Pennsylvan­ia’s highest court cited the ongoing pandemic and United States Postal Service delays in extending the deadline for mailed-in ballots to be received.

Ultimately fewer than 10,000 ballots were received during those three days. That small number of ballots would not have altered the outcome of the presidenti­al election in the state, which former President Donald Trump lost by some 80,000 votes.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States