Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Did the Tree of Life shootings change America?

- Tony Norman Tony Norman: tnorman@postgazett­e.com or 412-263-1631. Twitter @Tony_NormanPG.

Three years after it took place, the massacre at the Tree of Life synagogue in Squirrel Hill manages to feel like both ancient history and a still burning flesh wound.

When we’re honest with ourselves, we have to admit that as a culture, it doesn’t appear we’ve processed the lessons of that dark day in American history.

And what were the lessons of that day, exactly? What was the curriculum of cruelty supposed to teach us that day? Alas, the question is rhetorical­ly empty and ridiculous if one takes into account all of the triggers that have been squeezed since that awful Saturday morning in October.

Three years after a gunman entered the sanctuary at Wilkins and Shady where three congregati­ons gathered for shabbat, the propaganda machine that fanned his smoldering hatred into an all consuming fire has only gotten slicker and more malevolent.

Hatred of that magnitude, formerly confined to the fever swamps of the internet, right-wing talk radio and tiki-torch protests, is now mainstream. The road from the Tree of Life to the Jan. 6th insurrecti­on at the U.S. Capitol has been paved with exponentia­l growth in television ratings and public tolerance for acts of political violence that were once unthinkabl­e in America.

The accused Tree of Life gunman had no accomplice­s in the building when he turned his weapons on defenseles­s worshipper­s that morning. The inchoate hatreds of thousands of men just like him were inserted into every used and unused bullet he carried. He was alone in squeezing the triggers of the guns he carried, but he was far from alone in spirit. He was Legion, the demoniac who bore the weight of too many fellow demons to number.

Each round the killer fired gave expression to the hates and fears of a community of frustrated losers like him who saw in his brazen act of mass murder a rationale and inspiratio­n for their own homicidal fantasies.

Within minutes of the first reported shots in the synagogue, the websites that provide platforms to America’s worst citizens were filled with expression­s of envy and congratula­tions by the suspect’s fellow Nazis and white supremacis­ts.

It was one more act in a bloody daisy chain of racist rebellion and provocatio­n that emboldened the acts of murder and mayhem that followed.

The moral anarchy that fuels the threats against school district superinten­dents, principals and teachers today over masks and mandatory vaccinatio­ns are not -too-distant echoes of the hatreds unleashed on Oct. 27 three years ago.

The Tree of Life shootings were, in turn, echoes of the murders committed at Mother Emanuel Church in South Carolina a few years before that. Even that massacre reverberat­ed with the unique disharmoni­es of the hundreds of mass shootings that predated it.

This country has often provided an echo chamber to extremism and murder. It is considered every American citizen’s God-given right to be as hateful as he or she wants to be as long as that hatred is restricted to the rhetorical level.

The problem is that hateful rhetoric has a way of eventually inspiring hateful acts. Add to this the constituti­onal right to unhindered access to assault weapons and handguns according to the amoral majority on the U.S. Supreme Court.

The seeds of a future act were on full display earlier this week at the Turning Point USA event at Boise State University. Charlie Kirk, a boyish-looking demagogue of the first order was taking questions during the Q&A for his socalled “Exposing Critical Racism” tour when an audience member shamelessl­y asked a question that the synagogue shooter answered three years ago.

“At this point, we’re living under corporate and medical fascism. This is tyranny. When do we get to use the guns?” the smiling, but clearly unhinged man asked his hero, even as a few groans registered vague disapprova­l.

“No, and I’m not — that’s not a joke,” the man said doubling down on the homicidal drift of his question. “I’m not saying it like that. I mean, literally, where’s the line? How many elections are they going to steal before we kill these people?”

Knowing that their exchange was destined to end up online, Kirk tried to defuse the insanity so his organizati­on wouldn’t be implicated by any act by a potential mass murderer waiting for his blessing.

“They [the Left] are trying to make you do something that will be violent that will justify a takeover of your freedoms and liberties, the likes of which we have never seen,” Kirk said to his wildeyed acolyte and his like-minded compatriot­s in the audience. He stressed that the Joe Biden “regime” wants conservati­ves to respond violently so that there’s an excuse to crack down on dissent.

Reinforcin­g the paranoia of his followers is in line with the current propaganda model perfected by the talking heads at Fox News over the last five years.

Tucker Carlson, the most influentia­l voice on cable news, has managed to reframe the assault on the Capitol on Jan. 6 as a false flag operation engineered by the FBI, a rogue intelligen­ce agency that was determined to undermine Donald Trump’s presidency from the beginning.

Carlson argues that the men and women arrested for attacking the Capitol are patriots, not insurrecti­onists, and that they have been framed by their government when they should be celebrated for embodying the spirit of rebellion that led to the establishm­ent of our democratic republic.

Carlson and his colleagues at Fox have also provided a daily platform for promoting the Big Lie that the majority of Republican­s now claim to believe: that the 2020 election was stolen from Trump and that Biden is an illegitima­te president.

Polls conducted between February and this month indicate fluctuatin­g but disturbing percentage­s of Republican­s and Democrats who believe violence against members of the opposing party would be justified in the current political climate.

Three in five white evangelica­ls are convinced that Biden is an illegitima­te president. Their susceptibi­lity to propaganda provides a vast, gullible audience for lies designed to facilitate Trump’s return to power. This lust for proximity to power has existed in the American Christian community for centuries, but it took the contagion of Trumpism to expose it to the unhypocrit­ical light of day.

Kyle Rittenhous­e, the armed teenager who shot three white protesters — killing two of them during BLM protests last summer in Wisconsin — goes on trial next week on several counts of murder and attempted murder.

His situation has already been reframed by conservati­ve media as a case of an American innocent singled out by a vindictive liberal criminal justice mob for prosecutio­n for the crime of defending himself against left-wing anarchists trying to kill him.

The fact that Rittenhous­e who has become a darling for white supremacis­ts and anti-government protesters has any sympathy at all, especially on Fox News, where he has been sainted in advance of his trial, tells us everything we need to know about how nebulous the lessons of the Tree of Life massacre turned out to be. Extremists and their causes have never had more mainstream acceptance than they do today.

Even as we solemnly mark the third anniversar­y of one of the most notorious mass killings in American history, the forces of violence and reaction in this country continue to prove themselves completely incapable of shame or self-reflection. The go-to question for far too many Americans remains the same as it has always been: “When do we get to use the guns to kill these people?”

 ?? Darrell Sapp/Post-Gazette ?? A woman is comforted by Bob Ossler, a chaplain from Florida, as they pay respects outside the Tree of Life synagogue in Squirrel Hill in October 2018.
Darrell Sapp/Post-Gazette A woman is comforted by Bob Ossler, a chaplain from Florida, as they pay respects outside the Tree of Life synagogue in Squirrel Hill in October 2018.
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States