Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Why Whoopi Goldberg’s Holocaust remarks matter

- Ben Shapiro is a columnist for Creators Syndicate.

This week, former award-winning actress and highly decorated blowhard Whoopi Goldberg made a fool of herself. This came as no surprise; Ms. Goldberg does that quite regularly on “The View.”

But on Monday, she truly stood out.

Discussing an obscure Tennessee school board deciding to remove the Pulitzer Prize-winning graphic novel “Maus” from a Holocaust unit for eighth graders, Ms. Goldberg launched into an explanatio­n of the Holocaust dazzling in both its ignorance and its malignity.

Joy Behar led off by explaining that the Tennessee school board members “don’t like history that makes white people look bad.” Then Ms. Goldberg got going: “Maybe. This is white people doing it to white people. Y’all go fight amongst yourselves.”

This comment would have been insanely insulting, in and of itself: Here was Ms. Goldberg, referring to Nazis and Jews as “white people doing it to white people.” But she was just getting started. “If we’re going to do this,” Ms. Goldberg said, “let’s be truthful about it because the Holocaust isn’t about race. No. It’s not about race.” Ms. Behar correctly said, “They considered Jews a different race.” But Ms. Goldberg would not tolerate the dissent: “It’s not about race. It’s not about race. ... It’s about man’s inhumanity to man. That’s what it’s about.”

At this point, Ana Navarro attempted to intervene. “But it’s about white supremacy,” Ms. Navarro said. “It’s about going after Jews and gypsies.” No, said Ms. Goldberg. “These are two white groups of people. ... You’re missing the point. The minute you turn it into race, it goes down this alley. Let’s talk about it for what it is. It’s how people treat each other. It’s a problem. It doesn’t matter if you are Black or white because Black, white, Jews, Italians, everybody eats each other.”

The asininity cannot be overstated here. It is absolutely clear that the Nazis targeted Jews as a race; Hitler wasn’t exactly hiding the ball when he stated in “Mein Kampf”: “Is not their very existence founded on one great lie, namely, that they are a religious community, whereas in reality they are a race?” Hitler repeatedly referred to the Jews as a race of parasites, and targeted Jews on the basis of ethnicity rather than religious adherence.

What, precisely, did Ms. Goldberg think she was doing? The answer is that she believed she was upholding the intersecti­onal theory of race and racism. That theory holds that society is structured in a hierarchy of victimized and victimizin­g groups; that groups that are disproport­ionately successful are victimizer­s, and that groups that are disproport­ionately less successful are victimized.

Jews are disproport­ionately successful; thus, they are white. And, intersecti­onal theory posits, racism is not defined as a belief that any other race is superior or inferior to another; instead, racism means — as the Anti-Defamation League recently defined it — “the marginaliz­ation and/or oppression of people of color based on a socially constructe­d racial hierarchy that privileges white people.”

These two concepts, taken in tandem, mean that Jews cannot be considered victims of antisemiti­sm. They are highly successful; they are white. Thus, they cannot be members of a victimized minority. This is why the mainstream Left is so reluctant to recognize the antisemiti­sm of Hamas (Democratic Rep. Jamaal Bowman, for example, condemned Israel for defending itself against rocket attacks by Hamas by decrying “Black and brown bodies being brutalized and murdered”); it is why the mainstream Left is complicit in the lie that the only true antisemiti­sm springs from white supremacis­ts, ignoring actual acts of Jew-hatred by members of minority population­s. The intersecti­onal Left’s conspiracy theory — that a cabal of white victimizer­s ( including Jews, and now, Asians) control society for its own benefit — inherently crosses streams with antisemiti­sm.

Ms. Goldberg’s comments aren’t an aberration. They’re merely the latest iteration of a pernicious and perverse theory of power in politics — a conspiracy theory about groups that succeed and the systems in which they succeed.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States