Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

What ever happened to the ‘Great Resignatio­n’?

- Paul Krugman Paul Krugman is a columnist for The New York Times.

All of the evidence suggests that right now, it’s unusually easy for U.S. workers to find jobs and unusually hard for employers to find workers. The odd thing is that we have a very tight labor market, even though the number of employees is still about a million and a half below pre-pandemic levels and even further below the prepandemi­c trend.

For some time, many people, myself included, have been telling a story about this situation that goes by the name of the Great Resignatio­n. That tale goes like this: The COVID pandemic caused many Americans to reconsider whether they really wanted or needed to keep working.

Fear of infection or lack of child care kept some workers home, where they discovered that the financial rewards of their jobs weren’t enough to compensate for the costs of commuting and the unpleasant­ness of their work environmen­t. Older workers, forced into unemployme­nt, decided that they might as well take early retirement. And so on.

Well, when my informatio­n changes, I change my mind — a line often but dubiously attributed to John Maynard Keynes, but whatever. And the past few months of data have pretty much destroyed the Great Resignatio­n narrative.

Have large numbers of Americans dropped out of the labor force — that is, they are neither working nor actively seeking work? To answer this question, you need to look at age-adjusted data; falling labor force participat­ion because a growing number of Americans are older than 65 isn’t meaningful in this context. So economists often look at the labor force participat­ion of Americans in their prime working years: 25 to 54. And guess what? This participat­ion rate has surged recently. It’s still slightly below its level on the eve of the pandemic, but it’s back to 2019 levels, which hardly looks like a Great Resignatio­n.

What about early retirement? If a lot of that was happening, we would expect to see reduced labor force participat­ion among older workers, 55 to 64. But they have come rapidly back into the labor force.

A few months ago, it still seemed reasonable to talk about a Great Resignatio­n. At this point, however, there’s basically nothing there. It’s true that an unusually high number of workers have been quitting their jobs, but they have been leaving for other, presumably better, jobs rather than leaving the workforce. As labor economist Arindrajit Dube said, it’s more a Great Reshufflin­g than a Great Resignatio­n.

Yet if workers have for the most part come back to the labor force, how do we explain the seeming paradox? How can labor markets be so tight when payroll employment is still well below the pre-pandemic trend?

I’m sure that labor economists are scrambling to figure this out properly, but a quick look at the evidence suggests a couple of factors that many people telling the Great Resignatio­n narrative — again, myself included — missed.

First, as economist Dean Baker has been pointing out, the most commonly cited measures of employment don’t count the self-employed, and self-employment is up by a lot: around 600,000 more workers than the average in 2019.

Some of this self-employment may be fictitious — gig workers who are employees in all but name, but work for companies that classify them as independen­t contractor­s to avoid regulation. But it also does seem as if part of the Great Reshufflin­g has involved Americans concluding that they could improve their lives by starting their own businesses.

Second, a point that receives far less attention than it should is the decline of immigratio­n since Donald Trump came to office, which turned into a plunge with the coming of the pandemic. Many immigrants are working age and highly motivated; their absence means that we shouldn’t have expected employment to maintain its old trend.

Does the declining plausibili­ty of the Great Resignatio­n narrative have any policy implicatio­ns?

Well, I don’t like saying this, but it does seem to reinforce the case for higher interest rates. Until recently, it was fairly common for monetary doves to argue that we weren’t really at full employment because there were many potential workers still sitting on the sidelines. That’s now a hard case to make; the U.S. economy now looks overheated by just about every measure, which means that it needs to be cooled off a bit.

The other implicatio­n is that if we want to revive U.S. economic vitality, we really should try to re-establish our nation’s historic role as a destinatio­n for ambitious immigrants. But that’s not a policy idea likely to get much traction, given the American right’s anti-immigrant hysteria.

Anyway, you should know that all of those stories about how Americans are no longer willing to work seem to have evaporated. The Great Resignatio­n now looks like a Great Misunderst­anding.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States