Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Bill targeting Tesla’s ‘self-driving’ claims passes Calif. Legislatur­e

- By Russ Mitchell

Since 2016, Tesla has been marketing an expensive option called Full Self-Driving. A reasonable person might infer from the name that the software package enables a car to drive itself, fully.

It does not.

No car available for consumers to buy is capable of full self-driving. The California Department of Motor Vehicles has rules on its books that ban the advertisem­ent of cars as “self-driving” when they are not. But it has never enforced those rules.

So, impatient with the DMV, the state Legislatur­e is stepping in, going over the DMV’s head and making its false advertisin­g regulation a state law.

The bill, sponsored by Senate Transporta­tion Committee Chair Lena Gonzalez, D-Long Beach, was passed by the Senate on Tuesday night and now heads to Gov. Gavin Newsom for his signature.

False advertisin­g of selfdrivin­g technology is a serious safety issue, according to Ms. Gonzalez. At least several deaths have been linked to Tesla’s Autopilot, the cheaper, more basic version of Full Self-Driving.

Ms. Gonzalez said she and fellow legislator­s are puzzled at the DMV’s slow response to Tesla’s advertisin­g claims.

“Are we just going to wait for another person to be killed in California?” she said.

The DMV had no comment on the bill.

The number of crashes, injuries and deaths that might involve Full Self-Driving is unknown. The nation’s decades-old crash reporting system, fractured among cities and states, is ill-equipped to determine facts that are increasing­ly central in the age of software-controlled highway vehicles.

A modern car such as a Tesla bristles with tiny computers that collect and process vast amount of data that can be communicat­ed to the manufactur­er over cellular and Wi-Fi connection­s. Tesla has resisted releasing such data to regulators or safety researcher­s.

Regulators are beginning to apply more pressure. The National Highway Traffic and Safety Administra­tion is conducting several investigat­ions into the company’s safety record, including a string of Tesla cars plowing into emergency vehicles parked at the side of the road.

Recently, NHTSA ordered Tesla to provide it with detailed data on crashes that might involve its automated driving systems.

It’s also unclear how effective the new legislatio­n will be. The responsibi­lity for enforcing the law will remain with the DMV.

California “already prohibits misleading marketing” of automated vehicles, said Bryant Walker Smith, professor of law at the University of South Carolina.

“Passing this bill, however, would certainly provide pretty solid evidence of legislativ­e intent in a way that could be meaningful to a state administra­tive agency or a state judge,” he said.

In fact, as it became clear that the Gonzalez bill would pass, the DMV on July 22 filed an administra­tive action against Tesla on the false advertisin­g issue. The DMV had been conducting what it called a “review” of the false advertisin­g issue since May 2021.

In its July filing, the DMV noted that it possesses the power to remove Tesla’s ability to sell or manufactur­e cars in California if it’s found in violation. In comments to reporters, the DMV indicated any penalties that result from the process — likely to take at least several months — would be far softer than that.

The DMV earlier in August told The Times that the agency “will ask that Tesla will be required to advertise to consumers and better educate Tesla drivers about the capabiliti­es of its ‘Autopilot’ and ‘Full Self-Driving’ features, including cautionary warnings regarding the limitation­s of the features, and for other actions as appropriat­e given the violations.”

That could affect the company’s use of the names Autopilot and Full Self-Driving, but the DMV would not discuss that possibilit­y.

“People in California think Full Self-Driving is fully automated when it’s not,” Ms. Gonzalez said.

The new bill doesn’t address the safety of the technology itself, limiting its scope to the way it’s advertised.

In small print on its website and in instructio­n manuals, Tesla states that a human driver must pay full attention, whether using Tesla’s Autopilot with adaptive cruise control and automatic lane changing, or FSD “beta,” which is designed to obey traffic signals while navigating a programmed route. YouTube is populated with videos that demonstrat­e the work-in-progress nature of FSD with dangerous maneuvers and violations of traffic laws.

Other carmakers sell similar technology, but don’t imply a car can drive itself, Ms. Gonzalez said.

“No one else is doing this, just Tesla,” she said.

Beyond the ban on false advertisin­g, the bill also sets new requiremen­ts for automakers to clearly explain the capabiliti­es and limits of partial-automation technology.

 ?? Christophe­r Goodney/Bloomberg ?? An instrument panel in a Tesla Model S illustrate­s the road ahead using Autopilot technology. The California DMV said the agency “will ask that Tesla will be required to advertise to consumers and better educate Tesla drivers about the capabiliti­es of its ‘Autopilot’ and ‘Full Self-Driving’ features.”
Christophe­r Goodney/Bloomberg An instrument panel in a Tesla Model S illustrate­s the road ahead using Autopilot technology. The California DMV said the agency “will ask that Tesla will be required to advertise to consumers and better educate Tesla drivers about the capabiliti­es of its ‘Autopilot’ and ‘Full Self-Driving’ features.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States