Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Accused rioter asks for venue change

Tries to get phone evidence tossed

- By Torsten Ove

A welder living in Uniontown accused of violently assaulting the U.S. Capitol using mace in support of Donald Trump’s election lies is asking that his case be moved from Washington, D.C., and that prosecutor­s not be allowed to use informatio­n seized from his phone after the FBI arrested him.

Peter Schwartz, a felon from Kentucky who was working in Uniontown, is charged with numerous felony counts in connection with storming the Capitol and using mace on police, then later bragging that he should be in federal prison for what he did.

If he’s convicted, that outcome is almost certain.

His wife, Shelly Stallings, is also charged with violence in the insurrecti­on and last month indicated she intends to plead guilty.

Schwartz and his lawyer, Dennis Boyle, this week asked the D.C. judge in their case to switch any potential trial to another federal jurisdicti­on, dismiss an obstructio­n count, bar U.S. prosecutor­s from using evidence taken from his phone and separate his case from two other accused rioters set to go on trial with him.

The most significan­t motion is an attempt to get the phone evidence tossed on the theory that the FBI illegally accessed the device by tricking Schwartz.

The Pittsburgh FBI arrested Schwartz on Feb. 2, 2021, at his house in Uniontown on a warrant out of the Western District of Pennsylvan­ia.

Mr. Boyle said that agents put him in handcuffs and then told him if he had any contact numbers in the phone, he’d better get them now because they were going to seize the phone.

With his hands cuffed, Schwartz unlocked the phone. As soon as he did, Mr. Boyle said, an agent “shoved Mr. Schwartz into the wall while another agent snatched the phone out of his hands” and walked away with it. Schwartz said the agent was “laughing.”

Schwartz said he told the agents he wasn’t giving them permission to search his phone and never would, and they said they’d get a warrant later. An agent then did a preliminar­y search of the phone and took screenshot­s of photos and text messages, Mr. Boyle said.

Two days later agents got a search warrant, Mr. Boyle said, saying in the paperwork that they used Schwartz’s fingerprin­ts to unlock the phone. But, he said, they “neglected to state that Mr. Schwartz was tricked into unlocking his phone and that he did not provide his fingerprin­t voluntaril­y.”

Mr. Boyle said the search amounted to a warrantles­s intrusion into private property in violation of Schwartz’s constituti­onal rights.

In another motion, Mr. Boyle said the trial should be moved from D.C. because his client can’t get a fair trial there, an argument other rioters have made without success.

Schwartz has the right to be tried by a jury on the evidence alone, Mr. Boyle said, “without being tempted to tar him with the same brush as others who were present at the Capitol grounds or who shared some of his political views.” He argued that it’s too tempting for jurors to lump him in with all the other rioters who have been charged or convicted.

In a third motion, also attempted unsuccessf­ully by many other defendants, Mr. Boyle asked the judge to throw out one of the counts against Schwartz charging him with obstructio­n of an official proceeding.

Mr. Boyle said the certificat­ion of the Electoral College on Jan. 6 was not really an official proceeding as defined by the law because it was not an “evidence-gathering” event. He argued that the Justice Department is trying to “stretch” the statute beyond its meaning to include the obstructio­n count.

Judges in other D.C. rioter cases have repeatedly thrown out that claim.

In a final motion, Mr. Boyle also wants his client’s case separated from those of two other men charged along with him and his wife: Markus Maly, of Virginia, and Jeffrey Brown, of California. Mr. Boyle said their cases are not related to Schwartz or his wife, they don’t know them, and evidence of what the others did should not be included in any ca se against Schwartz.

Maly, for example, went on social media after the insurrecti­on and bragged about how much fun it was while admitting to stealing a riot shield from a police officer and posting videos of

what he did, according to the FBI.

Mr. Boyle said Maly’s actions had nothing to do with Schwartz. indicated Aug. 5 that she will enter a guilty plea to all counts.

Schwartz and Stallings live in Owensboro, Ky., but Schwartz had been staying at a rented house in Uniontown while working for a local welding company.

The pair are accused of assaulting police, entering a restricted building, obstructio­n of law enforcemen­t during civil disorder and various other offenses.

Among the FBI’s evidence is footage of Schwartz extending his arm from the crowd and spraying police with mace. He is later seen wielding a wooden baton, according to agent testimony.

After the riot, Schwartz posted on Facebook that the events of Jan. 6 were the “opening of a war.”

A review of his texts also revealed him bragging about throwing a chair at police and instigatin­g the violence, saying “I started Shelly Stallings,that” and “I stole their [expletive] Schwartz’s wife, accompanie­d and used it on him to the Capitol and them,” a reference to a canister engaged in violence with of mace agents said he him, prosecutor­s said. She took from officers.

 ?? U.S. Dept. of Justice ?? Peter Schwartz is seen in video during the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.
U.S. Dept. of Justice Peter Schwartz is seen in video during the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States