Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

The connection between Christian missionari­es, white nationalis­m

This white-Christian-centered narrative of American success worked in multiple ways at the turn-of-the20th-century. It enhanced an idealized vision of what a powerful nation looked like, in which Christiani­ty was the foundation for nation-building.

- Chanhee Heo Chanhee Heo is a PhD candidate in religious studies at Stanford University, studying 20th-century U.S. religious history with a focus on race and immigratio­n.

During the 23rd Seoul Queer Culture Festival in July, thousands of attendees waved rainbow flags and cheered on glamorous drag queens while surrounded on all sides by unscalable fences. These barriers were intended to prevent possible conflicts between attendees of the festival and those protesting it, a group largely consisting of Korean Christians.

During a worship service held on the other side of the fence, protesters sang “Stand Up for Jesus” and mourned for their nation, which they perceive to be confrontin­g divine punishment “like Sodom.” Holding banners with messages like “Return to Jesus” and “No Antidiscri­mination Law,” the protesters readied themselves for what many of them were calling their “spiritual battle” against homosexual­ity.

Amid the dissonant voices, one symbol appeared on both sides of the fence: the U.S. flag.

In the hands of the festival attendees, U.S. flags represente­d liberal America, an ally of LGBTQ communitie­s. In the hands of the protesters, however, American flags took on a different meaning. Their embrace of militarist­ic language, calling themselves “people of faith under attack,” and their doomsday warnings against a “dying South Korea” echoed talking points from a thoroughly American Christian nationalis­t movement.

The global expansion of American evangelism contribute­d to Koreans’ associatio­n of Christiani­ty with the United States and white supremacy. In the late-19th century, waves of American missionari­es settled in Korea as part of a larger movement of American imperial expansioni­sm through philanthro­pic missions.

They aimed to extend salvation to “uncivilize­d heathens” and create a global Christian family while furthering their country’s military, cultural and economic influence. For Koreans who struggled with corruption at the local and national levels of government, missionari­es from America who provided social services appeared to offer a solution.

Many missionari­es also described to Koreans the freedom to practice Christiani­ty in America as protected by the U.S. Constituti­on, a striking counterpoi­nt to life under increasing Japanese control. Wielding enormous military influence in East Asia, the Japanese government forced Korean Christians to turn against both their country and religion by participat­ing in State Shinto, a religious and national ritual system that included shrine worship practices. The idea that they could worship freely as Christians in the United States made America seem especially appealing.

The first Korean Methodist bishop, the Rev. Ryang Ju-sam, who was pastor of the San Francisco Korean Methodist Church from 1906, when he immigrated to the United States, believed that Christiani­ty was the basis for the intellectu­ally and materially “advanced” United States. In the Korean Evangel, a monthly magazine broadly shared among Korean immigrants, Ryang wrote that “the Bible governs this prosperous America ... and the constituti­on was faithfully enacted through the inspiratio­n of the Bible.”

Believing Protestant Christiani­ty was deeply connected to America’s national stability and the contentmen­t of its citizens, Ryang highlighte­d U.S. presidents such as Abraham Lincoln and William Howard Taft as faith leaders who “solemnly committed [their] official obligation­s in front of God.”

Ryang’s conception of Christian America was particular­ly rooted in ideas of whiteness tied to popular discussion­s of eugenics and social Darwinism in the late-19th century. In an 1897 issue of the Korean newspaper Tongnip sinmun, Korean writers illustrate­d distinct hierarchie­s of each racial type. For instance, the “Oriental race” was the second-tier race below the white race, “the most clever, diligent, and brave among all the races in the world,” but above the “Black and Red humans.”

When the global “civilizing project” approached a Korea that was struggling to survive, often in competitio­n with neighborin­g countries, these ideas gained adherents. Intellectu­als like Ryang believed that if Koreans embraced Christiani­ty, it would better equip them with the necessary morality and knowledge to overcome this perceived inferiorit­y.

This white-Christian-centered narrative of American success worked in multiple ways at the turn-of-the-20th-century. It enhanced an idealized vision of what a powerful nation looked like, in which Christiani­ty was the foundation for nation-building.

Many Korean Christians, including the protesters at this summer’s festival, still hold onto that narrative of America. Many also believe in a “true Christiani­ty” predicated on convention­al and biblical Protestant Christian values.

As journalist Choi Kyung-sik argued, the Biden administra­tion, led by a Catholic president, was rupturing the Puritan founding principles of America. Another Korean Christian coalition including Anti-Homosexual­ity Christian Solidarity firmly maintained in its open statement, “America should return to the Bible, not violating its forefather­s’ inheritanc­e of Christian faith.”

The pernicious effects of the myth of a white-Christian-centered America are becoming obvious within the United States, from the Jan. 6 insurrecti­on at the U.S. Capitol, to the Supreme Court’s overturnin­g of Roe v. Wade, to Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene’s Instagram posts. This ideology, however, has long transcende­d U.S. borders and has traveled to countries like South Korea, whose history is inextricab­ly tied with white American Christiani­ty.

The resurgence of Christian nationalis­m now threatens American democracy and human rights. Understand­ing this story in a global context only magnifies its power.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States