Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

’23 Mazda CX-50: A little SUV with fun Mazda touches, and one not-so-fun one

- Driver’s seat SCOTT STURGIS Scott Sturgis is a freelance auto writer; mrdriverss­eat@gmail.com.

This week: 2023 Mazda CX-50 Turbo Premium Plus

Price: $41,500 as tested. Premium paint is the only option beyond the trim level.

Convention­al wisdom: Car and Drivers likes the “refined powertrain, good ride and handling balance, premium looks,” but not the “infotainme­nt quirks, costlier than a CX-5, trying too hard for a rugged image.”

Marketer’s pitch: “An instigator of curiosity.” What?

Reality: As hard to figure out as that tagline, but kind of fun in the end.

Competitio­n: Honda CR-V, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sportage, Subaru Forester, and Toyota RAV4 are among the highlights of this crowded segment.

What’s new: The CX-50 is new midsize SUV from the tiny Japanese automaker. It comes only in AWD and aims to be a rugged alternativ­e to the CX-5.

Up to speed: The 2.5-liter turbo four creates 227 horses when fed with regular fuel (256 if you want to take out a second mortgage for premium). The engine feels fairly lethargic, even running on fleet service-funded premium, like it takes a moment to decide, “Oh, OK, we’re really going to go. Fiiiine.”

But what it lacks in initial power it more than makes up for once it gets going. Car and Driver says the CX-50 makes pretty quick work of arriving at 60 mph, doing so in just 6.6 seconds.

This is the optional engine in the CX-50; a 187-horsepower no-turbo version comes standard.

Perhaps I’m so unimpresse­d after all the hybrids and EVs I’ve been enjoying, which create so much more momentum from the get-go. Still, strong advantage Mazda.

Fuel economy: The CX-50 shows how relying solely on a turbocharg­er is probably not the best way to go about adding performanc­e while saving fuel. And this is certainly a shortfall of Mazda engines historical­ly. Averaging 19.5 mpg — and not just under Mr. Driver’s Seat’s athletic test maneuvers — is a huge disappoint­ment.

The Terrain wins here.

Shifty: The six-speed automatic transmissi­on probably doesn’t help with fuel economy. The vehicle could use a couple more steps to draw the most out of

the engine, especially in the low end.

Shifting is available through the lever or steering wheel paddles.

On the road: The CX-50 does provide some delight on the curves, and highway driving is comfortabl­e and smooth.

In fact, the engine seems most suited to high-speed driving, where it never lacked for passing oomph. And this may also explain to poor fuel economy and reaffirm the need for more gears.

Driver’s Seat: The seats at first seemed a little firm, but over the test week I found myself becoming more pleased with the feel and support. We managed a couple trips to Philadelph­ia so we definitely had the seat time.

The gauges announced the inherent Mazdaosity of the vehicle, with the traditiona­l typeface on the gauges and a minimalist approach to informatio­n.

Friends and stuff: The rear seat provides great space in the corners, but the middle seat suffers from a giant hump and a seatback that protrudes quite high for any occupants there.

Cargo space is ample, with 31.4 cubic feet behind the rear seat and 56.3 behind the front row.

The CX-50 cargo bay looks like there could be a tiny third row there.

Towing with the upgraded engine hits 3,500 pounds, more than double the GMC Terrain. Even the CX-50 nonturbo beats the Terrain at 2,000. Advantage CX-50.

Play some tunes: The Bose Surround Sound Bose 12-speaker premium audio system with Centerpoin­t and AudioPilot turns the CX-50 stereo into one of the top sound systems I’ve enjoyed. It picks out previously unheard pieces of songs I’ve been listening to most of my life, right up there with the Honda Odyssey. Plan to be driving along and wondering “What am I hearing?” more than a few times before reminding yourself, “Ah, yes, this surround sound.” A+.

Operation of the system is via the Mazda console knob and button setup that I’ve grown less fond of over time. The screen is a touchscree­n, but it’s on the small side and too far from the driver to be convenient. Still, serious advantage Mazda.

Keeping warm and cool: Mazda’s HVAC systems can be a little much. The air doesn’t direct well and airflow can be a lot, so it’s a bad combinatio­n. Knobs control temperatur­e while hard-to-see buttons lay flat on a dashboard bar, and they handle everything else. The readout remains a bit small and under-contrasted. I may be of a certain age and have certainly had bad eyes long before the cool kids did, but some day you’ll see things my way. Or barely see things my way.

Night shift: The lights provide great illuminati­on, and bendy headlights are a nice feature at this price point. (See Grandpa’s Eyes, above.) The interior lights are subtle and don’t get in the way while still helping occupants see.

Fuel economy: Fooled ya. I know I have a couple readers who skip to here. Go back to the “Up to speed” section.

Where it’s built: Huntsville, Alabama.

How it’s built: Consumer Reports predicts the CX-50 reliabilit­y to be a 4 out of 5.

In the end: The CX-50 is a much nicer vehicle to live with than the Terrain, until it comes time to feed it.

 ?? ?? The gauges inside the Mazda CX-50 have the traditiona­l typeface and a minimalist approach to informatio­n.
The gauges inside the Mazda CX-50 have the traditiona­l typeface and a minimalist approach to informatio­n.
 ?? ?? The Mazda CX-50 is a new midsize SUV that aims to be a rugged alternativ­e to the CX-5.
The Mazda CX-50 is a new midsize SUV that aims to be a rugged alternativ­e to the CX-5.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States