Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Present at the terminatio­n

- Mary Ann Resnik Mary Ann Resnik, a Pittsburgh native, is a retired physician.

Several decades ago, I was present in an operating room during a second trimester pregnancy terminatio­n. The young mother, pregnant by a romantic relationsh­ip, was in good physical and mental health. She was accompanie­d to the waiting area by several supportive family members. The fetus had no known health issues or defects.

Abortion “rights” has become a prominent topic of conversati­on and commentary since the Supreme Court’s Dobbs ruling overruled Roe v. Wade and gave the issue to the individual states. A large percentage of voters named it as their primary determinan­t for casting their vote in the last election.

In order to complete the second term abortion that day, it was necessary to dismember the fetus and identify body parts. The gynecologi­st removed and identified one leg, then the other, and then, unexpected­ly, a third. Twins.

A large part of my thirty-two year career in medicine was spent working in operating rooms. I have witnessed and participat­ed in herculean efforts to save lives, an effort often rewarded by the joyful reaction of patient relatives when informed that their loved ones survived. I have also seen the heartbreak­ing reaction of patient relatives when these efforts failed.

In order to provide optimal care for patients in an operating room setting, one must become inured to blood loss, trauma, medical complicati­ons and the possibilit­y of death. That day, however, I found myself not only mentally, but almost physically affected, a state admittedly heightened by the fact that I was actively trying to adopt.

I was well aware of how difficult it was, and to what lengths people would go to adopt one healthy baby, let alone two. I could imagine what the joyous reaction would have been of someone navigating the adoptive process to being handed two babies.

However, despite my years of experience in dealing with patients and their relatives, I had no concept of how anyone, including myself, would respond to the knowledge that two genetic descendant­s ceased to exist in an operating room not despite the efforts of all medical personnel involved to save a life, but because of his or her personal choice or contributi­on to a choice to end it.

Could this young woman and family not have devoted their love and time to the less than half a year of gestation that remained to what I knew to be the almost certain possibilit­y of the choice of a family that desperatel­y wanted to raise their children if they did not or could not?

They and I will never know, because instead of babies in a double stroller, these two offspring began and ended their time in the outside world as body parts in a surgical basin. The memory still haunts me.

I have been very fortunate to travel to many European countries. Even though, as of 2020, twenty- four of twenty- seven European countries do not allow elective abortions past fourteen weeks and twenty-two not beyond twelve weeks — much shorter limits than America until Dobbs — I still would not live anywhere other than America. I was happy to cast my vote in the last election.

A simple process, but still one that required coordinate­d limb movements, eye motion and the ability to move in my environmen­t, all, ironically, physical acts which can be performed by a fetus in utero in the second trimester. I did so because I wanted to take advantage of one of the many opportunit­ies I have been given in this life to help others, and to help prevent more healthy offspring of healthy mothers being denied existence halfway to the beginning of the fulfillmen­t of theirs.

I received notificati­on that my vote was received on my iPhone, an invention due in large part to Steve Jobs, given the gift of adoption by his unwed mother. Lucky man. Lucky world.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States