Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Hopes for quick passage of Ukraine aid bill dim

No breakthrou­gh on border talks

- By Karoun Demirjian The New York Times

WASHINGTON — The prospects for passing legislatio­n to speed military aid to Ukraine this year are fading, as Republican­s balk at striking a quick deal on immigratio­n-policy changes they have demanded in exchange for allowing the bill to move forward.

After a weekend of intensive bipartisan border talks yielded progress but no breakthrou­gh, Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., majority leader, acknowledg­ed Monday that negotiator­s were still far from completing a deal.

“It’s going to take some more time to get it done,” he said on the Senate floor Monday afternoon, laying out plans for the week that made no mention of any votes on the aid package for Ukraine.

That was a reversal from last week, when Mr. Schumer announced he would delay the Senate’s holiday break and keep the chamber in Washington this week, in hopes of reviving and passing the Ukraine aid bill before leaving for the year.

But Republican­s have let it be known they have no intention of dropping their objections by then.

“We feel like we’re being jammed,” Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” on Sunday. “We’re not anywhere close to a deal. It’ll go into next year.”

Senate negotiator­s, who since last week have been meeting daily with White House officials and Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas to hash out a way forward, said they had resolved some disputes over enhanced border enforcemen­t measures.

“It’s very important to be careful, and to do it correctly, and that’s what we’re doing,” Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, I-Ariz., said of the negotiatio­ns Sunday night, later adding, “The reality is we’ve got lots of issues to work through.”

“We do need to be aware of the fact that this is not just an exercise in the Senate,” Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, said on “Fox News Sunday.” “It’s not just the Senate and the president agreeing to something. It’s something that can actually pass the House and be signed into law.”

On Sunday, Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., circulated a letter signed by 14 of his colleagues calling on his party’s leaders to hold a special meeting, no earlier than Jan. 8, on the details of the border talks.

“Rushed and secret negotiatio­ns with Democrats who want an open border and who caused the current crisis will not secure the border,” they wrote.

At the same time, factions of both parties are rebelling over the direction of the negotiatio­ns. In recent days, senators and administra­tion officials appear to have coalesced around raising the standard for migrants to claim that they can credibly fear persecutio­n if returned to their home countries.

Negotiator­s have also found common ground on the idea of expanding the administra­tion’s ability to quickly deport migrants who unlawfully cross into the United States. The authority would kick in once the number of crossings rises above officials’ capacity to detain and process migrants.

They are still at odds, however, on issues such as which migrants should be held in detention or allowed into the country on parole to await their court appearance­s.

The areas of emerging agreement have angered progressiv­e Democrats and Hispanic lawmakers, who have warned White House officials against reviving Donald Trump-era border policies Mr. Biden previously rejected.

Mr. Mayorkas and Jeffrey Zients, White House chief of staff, promised leaders of the Congressio­nal Hispanic Caucus in a virtual call Saturday that they would keep them better apprised about the border talks. But members of the caucus said they were still incensed about the range of restrictiv­e policies the administra­tion had been willing to entertain, according to people familiar with the private meeting who discussed it on the condition of anonymity.

 ?? ?? Senate Majority Leader Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.: “It’s going to take some more time to get it done.”
Senate Majority Leader Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.: “It’s going to take some more time to get it done.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States