Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

The evidence shows that social media perpetuate­s inequality

- Pamela Paul Pamela Paul is a columnist for The New York Times, where this article first appeared.

For some people, social media is inconseque­ntial — a cat photo here, a banana slip TikTok there. For others, it’s all-consuming — a helpless catapult into a slurry of anxiety, self-harm and depression.

To each his own internet. Still, we know social media use can harm mental health. We know that this disproport­ionately affects young people. And we know that girls, who use social media more than boys, are disproport­ionately affected.

But social media use also differs by race and ethnicity — and there’s far less discussion of that. According to a new study by Pew, Black and Hispanic teenagers between ages 13 and 17 spend far more time on most social media apps than their white peers. One in 3 Hispanic teens, for example, say they are “almost constantly” on TikTok, compared with 1 in 5 Black teenagers and 1 in 10 white teenagers. Higher percentage­s of Hispanic (27%) and Black teenagers (23%) are almost constantly on YouTube compared with white teenagers (9%); the same trend is true for Instagram.

Overall, 55% of Hispanic teenagers and 54% of Black teenagers say they are online almost constantly, compared with 38% of white teenagers; Black and Hispanic kids between ages 8 and 12, another study found, also use social media more than their white counterpar­ts.

Snorkel vs. scuba

Black and Latino kids use social media differentl­y from white kids, Linda Charmarama­n, director of the Youth, Media and Wellbeing Research Lab at Wellesley Centers for Women, told me. “It’s culturally more acceptable in youth of color households to use technology for social and academic reasons compared with white households,” Charmarama­n said.

Not surprising­ly, disparitie­s in social media usage reflect inequaliti­es in the real world. Largely because of lower income levels, Black and Hispanic teenagers are less likely to have broadband access or computers at home. This makes them disproport­ionately use their smartphone­s, where social media apps ping, whiz and notify. Lucia Magis-Weinberg, an assistant professor of psychology at the University of Washington who studies teenagers and tech, compares internet use of the phone to snorkeling, whereas computers allow more of a scuba dive.

The phones, at least, are always there. “We know broadly that youth of minoritize­d communitie­s have longer commutes, fewer opportunit­ies to do afterschoo­l activities, fewer resources,” Magis-Weinberg told me. They may not have spaces to hang out safely with friends nearby; social media is a more accessible option. “But we have to ask,” Magis-Weinberg added, “what is social media use displacing?”

The answer, according to experts, includes sports participat­ion, in-person socializin­g, after-school clubs and activities, exploring the outdoors, reading and more.

Replacing reading

Let’s consider just reading, which also happens to be correlated with both mental well-being and school achievemen­t. According to Scholastic’s most recent Kids and Family Reading Report, the percentage of kids ages 6 to 17 who read frequently dropped to 28% in 2022 from 37% in 2010. Those numbers fall precipitou­sly as kids get older; 46% of 6- to 8-year-olds read frequently in 2022 compared with only 18% of 12- to 17-year-olds.

And these declines are tied to internet use. All this raises the possibilit­y that disparitie­s in internet use could in turn intensify overall declines and existing difference­s in reading across racial groups among adults. The average daily time spent reading per capita by ethnicity in 2022 was 0.29 hours for white adults, 0.12 for Black adults and 0.10 for Hispanics.

In other words, one danger is that social media not only reflects real-world disparitie­s — it could also exacerbate them.

Greater use of social media by Black and Hispanic young people “can help perpetuate inequality in society because higher levels of social media use among kids have been demonstrab­ly linked to adverse effects such as depression and anxiety, inadequate sleep, eating disorders, poor self-esteem and greater exposure to online harassment,” Jim Steyer, the founder of Common Sense Media, told me.

Delayed realizatio­n

As is so often the case, the kids most affected are likely to be the ones least equipped to handle the consequenc­es. Akeem Marsh, medical director of the Home of Integrated Behavior Health at The New York Foundling, a social services agency, said that among the hundreds of largely Black and Hispanic kids he sees from communitie­s with fewer resources, social media use is frequently a primary concern. Kids who use it frequently often respond with traumatize­d feelings and repeated anxiety.

“The way social media use presents itself is as something that is actively harmful,” Marsh told me. Already kids from these communitie­s have few advantages, he explained. They may not have access to after-school programs. They’re often in single-parent households. They lack support systems. “I think in the long term,” he said, “we’re going to see real difference­s in the impact.”

To better understand what that long term might look like, we should go beyond additional research. We need immediate action. What we do not need is another “sudden” yet regrettabl­y delayed realizatio­n that something has gone very, very wrong with America’s kids, but we were too busy looking the other way.

 ?? Ore Huiying/The New York Times ?? The office for ByteDance, which owns TikTok, in Singapore on Jan. 26. According to a new study by Pew, Black and Hispanic teenagers between ages 13 and 17 spend far more time on most social media apps than their white peers.
Ore Huiying/The New York Times The office for ByteDance, which owns TikTok, in Singapore on Jan. 26. According to a new study by Pew, Black and Hispanic teenagers between ages 13 and 17 spend far more time on most social media apps than their white peers.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States