Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

The thin line between leftist antizionis­m and antisemiti­sm

- Michelle Goldberg Michelle Goldberg is a columnist for The New York Times.

In reaction to the grotesque suffering in the Gaza Strip, two ugly, intertwine­d trends are gaining steam. Well- intentione­d opponents of Jewish nationalis­m, some Jewish themselves, are being falsely smeared as antisemite­s. At the same time, antisemiti­sm is cloaking itself in antiZionis­m, with people spitting out the word “Zionist” when they really seem to mean “Jew.”

Ambivalent and conflicted

My own views on Zionism are ambivalent and conflicted. I’m a secular Jew with no particular attachment to Israel, spiritual or otherwise, though I also recognize that my ability to hold myself aloof from the country is enabled by the great privilege of an American passport. I

think the idea of Israel as a colonial entity that will eventually be dismantled is a malign fantasy — most Jewish Israelis don’t have anywhere else to go — but I also recognize that the country’s creation can’t be disentangl­ed from the dispossess­ion of the Palestinia­ns.

Yes, as Zionists often point out, Palestinia­ns were far from the only people made refugees as maps were redrawn in the wake of World War II. After Israel’s creation, more Jews were uprooted from Arab and Muslim countries than Arabs expelled from their homes in historic Palestine.

It is not Israel’s fault that some of its neighbors kept displaced Palestinia­ns as stateless refugees rather than integratin­g them as full citizens.

But I could never blame a Palestinia­n for thinking it obscenely unfair that I have a right to “return” to a country to which I have no family connection, while Palestinia­ns who lost their homes in 1948 do not.

I also understand why many Jews, the survivors of millennia of attempts to destroy them as a people, put their need for national self-determinat­ion above other, competing values. But one needn’t hate Jews to make a different moral calculus.

Right now, the relentless growth of settlement­s in the West Bank has created a onestate reality on the ground, although one in which people have very different rights and freedoms depending on their ethnic and religious background. The idea of a binational state appeals to my belief in democracy and multicultu­ralism, but in practice I fear it would devolve into a horrific civil war.

That said, I can’t fault Jews who see, in the mounting demonizati­on of Zionism, the replay of an old and terrifying story.

Anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism

After all, anti-Zionism isn’t always anti- Semitism, but sometimes it is. And right now, some opponents of Israel seem to be trying to prove that the mainstream Jewish community is right to conflate them.

An Israeli American student at the University of California, Santa Barbara, sent me a photo of graffiti reading “Zionists not welcome,” with an arrow pointing to a mezuza hung in a dorm room doorway.

In San Francisco, where artists and activists have insisted that the influentia­l Yerba Buena Center for the Arts purge “Zionist board members and funders,” the center’s Jewish chief executive resigned last week, citing a “vitriolic and antisemiti­c backlash directed at me personally.”

Plenty of leftists will swear up and down that they’re not being antisemiti­c when they use “Zionist” as the most contemptuo­us of epithets.

A Salt Lake City bar owner who has banned “Zionists” from his establishm­ent insisted, on Instagram, that Zionism “has nothing to do with the beautiful Jewish faith.”

But the vast majority of Jews disagree, and the longing for a return to Israel is deeply intertwine­d with Jewish religious practice; rituals for the two most important Jewish holidays, Passover and Yom Kippur, culminate with the words “next year in Jerusalem.” There is a long history of Jews being asked to excise what they see as crucial parts of their identity as a condition of acceptance. There is an equally long history of such acceptance, if it’s granted at all, being fleeting.

As I write this, literary magazine Guernica is having a meltdown over a searching essay written by Joanna Chen. Chen, a British Israeli translator of Hebrew and Arabic poetry, wrote about trying to “tread the line of empathy, to feel passion for both sides,” and finding meaning in driving Palestinia­n children to Israeli hospitals.

Nothing in her writing suggests anything but horror at the carnage being visited on civilians in Gaza. The piece neverthele­ss occasioned mass resignatio­ns from Guernica’s allvolunte­er staff. The magazine’s former co- publisher called it “a hand-wringing apologia for Zionism.”

In a cowardly move, Guernica retracted the essay and issued regrets for having published it. On parts of the left, at this fanaticall­y Manichaean moment, Jews, especially Israeli Jews, are allowed their humanity only if they’re willing to explicitly reject the collective. Few other peoples are subject to similar expectatio­ns.

Leftwing inconsiste­ncy

I’d compare leftwing demands that Jews disavow Zionism to right- wing demands for Muslims to renounce Shariah. Treating Muslims as suspect if they won’t break with their own traditions is obviously Islamophob­ic.

After years of arguing that the intention behind offensive words matters less than their effects, leftists should bring subtlety and sensitivit­y to discussion­s of Jews and Zionism. Refusing to do so does nothing to help Palestinia­ns. It just convinces too many Jews that cries for Palestinia­n liberation are a threat.

 ?? Menahem Kahana/Getty Images ?? A December 2007 demonstrat­ion by pro-settlement Israelis in the West Bank settlement.
Menahem Kahana/Getty Images A December 2007 demonstrat­ion by pro-settlement Israelis in the West Bank settlement.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States