Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Shortcomin­gs of braking system illustrate­d in triple train crash in Northampto­n County

- By Josh Funk

The collision of three Norfolk Southern trains in Pennsylvan­ia early this month highlights the shortcomin­gs of the automated braking system that was created to prevent such crashes.

None of the circumstan­ces the National Transporta­tion Safety Board described Tuesday in its preliminar­y report on the March 2 derailment would have triggered the automated positive train control system to stop the trains.

Not only was the system incapable of stopping the second train before it smashed into the back of a stopped train, but it also couldn’t stop the third train. It ran into the derailed cars blockings its track when it arrived less than a minute later.

“PTC today has not generally been designed to protect them in that situation,” railroad safety expert Chris Barkan said.

Congress required railroads to develop the positive train control system after a deadly 2008 collision between a Metrolink commuter train and a Union Pacific freight train in Chatsworth, Calif. That crash killed 25 people, including the Metrolink engineer, and injured more than 100. It took more than a decade and roughly $15 billion for the railroads to design and complete the system, but it only works in certain circumstan­ces.

In the Pennsylvan­ia crash, the eastbound train that smashed into a stopped train in Lower Saucon Township along the Lehigh River had slowed to 13 mph after passing a restricted speed signal. But without a stop signal, the braking system would not have been triggered.

The three railcars that derailed after that first collision blocked the adjacent track, and the third train smashed into them at about 22 mph. The braking system relies on informatio­n from the railroad’s signals to stop a train, and it can’t detect when something is blocking the tracks. But given that the third train arrived less than a minute later, there wouldn’t have been enough time to stop it anyway.

Six railcars, including three carrying ethanol and butane residue, derailed along with two locomotive­s on the third train, sending the locomotive­s into the river. No hazardous materials spilled other than the diesel that leaked from the locomotive­s. The seven crew members aboard the three trains had minor injuries.

Norfolk Southern estimated that the crashes caused $2.5 million damage, but the Atlanta-based railroad declined to comment on the NTSB’s preliminar­y report. The final report that will detail the cause won’t be completed for more than a year.

NTSB spokesman Keith Holloway said preliminar­y informatio­n “suggests that PTC limitation­s were involved in the accident” and no mechanical problems had been found at this early stage.

The NTSB said its investigat­ion will focus on the railroad’s rules, procedures and training. Norfolk Southern’s safety practices have been in the spotlight since one of its trains derailed in East Palestine, Ohio, in February 2023. That train released hazardous chemicals and caught fire in a derailment that prompted calls for changes in the industry that have largely stalled.

Federal regulation­s require crews operating a train in restricted speed areas to slow down enough that they will be able to stop within half the distance they can see. The NTSB said a light rain was falling at the time of the crash, but it didn’t say whether that impeded what the engineer and conductor could see. The report also didn’t say whether there were any curves or hills that made it hard for the crew to see the stopped train.

 ?? Nancy Run Fire Company via AP ?? Two locomotive­s and several rail cars left Nofolk Southern railway tracks along a riverbank in Northampto­n County on March 2. In all, three trains were involved in the crash.
Nancy Run Fire Company via AP Two locomotive­s and several rail cars left Nofolk Southern railway tracks along a riverbank in Northampto­n County on March 2. In all, three trains were involved in the crash.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States