Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Freight railroads ask courts to throw out new rule requiring two-person crews on trains

- By Josh Funk

Four railroads have asked federal appeals courts to throw out a new rule that would require twoperson train crews in most circumstan­ces, saying the mandate is arbitrary, capricious and an illegal abuse of discretion.

The identical challenges of the Federal Railroad Administra­tion’s rule were all filed this week in different appellate courts on behalf of Union Pacific, BNSF and two short line railroads — the Indiana Railroad and Florida East Coast Railway.

The new federal requiremen­t, announced last week, was a milestone in organized labor’s long fight to preserve the practice and came amid increasing scrutiny into railroad safety, especially in the wake of the fiery February 2023 derailment in eastern Ohio.

Most of those railroads did not immediatel­y offer additional explanatio­n for why they don’t like the rule, but the industry has long opposed such a regulation and the Associatio­n of American Railroads trade group said last week that the rule was unfounded and not supported by safety data. The Indiana Railroad — like many short lines across the country — already operates with one-person crews, but the major freight railroads all have twoperson crews that their union contracts require.

Union Pacific said in a statement “this rule, which lacks any data showing two people in a cab are safer than one, hinders our ability to compete in a world where technology is changing the transporta­tion industry and prevents us from preparing our workforce for jobs of the future.”

BNSF deferred comment to AAR, and the two smaller railroads did not immediatel­y respond to messages Thursday.

The regulators who announced the rule last Tuesday and the unions that have lobbied for the policy for years all argue there are clear safety benefits to having two people in the cab of locomotive­s to help operate the train because they can keep each other alert and the conductor can respond immediatel­y to any problems they encounter, including serving as the initial first-responder to a derailment.

Transporta­tion Secretary Pete Buttigieg has said the need to improve railroad safety was made glaringly clear last year when a Norfolk Southern train derailed on the outskirts of a town on the OhioPennsy­lvania border and spilled an assortment of hazardous chemicals that caught fire. That East Palestine derailment inspired calls for reform that have stalled in Congress.

But Mr. Buttigieg and the Federal Railroad Administra­tion declined to comment Thursday on the legal challenges to the new rule that is set to take effect in early June.

The head of the Brotherhoo­d of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen union Eddie Hall said this legal challenge is just another sign the railroads “place profits over safety.” He said keeping two people in the locomotive won’t keep railroads from investing in new technology, and the industry should focus on improving safety.

 ?? Gene J. Puskar/Associated Press ?? Four railroads have challenged a new federal rule that would require two-person train crews in most circumstan­ces, saying the mandate is arbitrary, capricious and an illegal abuse of discretion.
Gene J. Puskar/Associated Press Four railroads have challenged a new federal rule that would require two-person train crews in most circumstan­ces, saying the mandate is arbitrary, capricious and an illegal abuse of discretion.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States