Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

The ‘wide awake’ protesters who fought slavery and helped save democracy

- By Jon Grinspan

They called themselves the Wide Awakes: one of America’s largest, weirdest and most consequent­ial political organizati­ons, now nearly forgotten. Their success can tell us a lot about cobbling together a coalition in a fractured, tribal, distrustfu­l age.

In Boston, many had escaped slavery. In St. Louis, many were radical German immigrants. In D.C., their rallies mixed Yankee federal clerks with sons of Southern families. In Connecticu­t, where they got started, they were working-class kids with shady political backstorie­s.

And in 1860, this diverse coalition of young Americans drew the line against slavery and help to elect Abraham Lincoln. Clad in militarist­ic black capes, marching by torchlight through America’s cities, the Wide Awakes alarmed the Southern aristocrac­y of enslavers — which was exactly what they hoped to do.

The movement drew its mammoth size and unnerving force from the resentment many Americans felt toward “Slave Power”: the wealthy planters who pushed to expand slavery and brutally suppressed opposition.

A shocking movement

Started by a few kids barely old enough to vote in February 1860, the Wide Awakes were believed to be half a million strong by August of that year, with companies from Maine to California, Virginia to Kansas.

To understand how shocking this coalition was, we need to rethink the politics of antebellum America. Instead of a nation split between the absolutes of Slavery and Freedom, most Americans fell somewhere on a spectrum between the two. Just 2% of the population in 1860 actually enslaved anyone, and those Americans trapped in slavery made up another 12% of the nation’s men, women and children.

That left 86% of Americans who were neither enslavers nor enslaved. Some enthusiast­ically supported slavery, while others prayed for the practice to end. But most — especially among the large northern majority — found slavery distastefu­l while also objecting to what they saw as the radicalism of Abolition.

Caught in the middle, this majority bounced from party to party, explaining much of the tumult of

mid-19th-century politics. Enslavers skillfully exploited the unsettled situation and spent the 1850s demanding more slave states, the right to keep enslaved people even in free states, the prohibitio­n of

speech and writing against slavery, and a requiremen­t that free states assist in hunting fugitives.

This outsize influence was

backed by real and threatened violence, from the plains of Kansas to the halls of Congress. “I have no objection to the liberty of speech,” sneered Alexander Stephens, the future vice president of the Confederac­y, so long as “the liberty of the cudgel is free to combat it.”

The moderate majority began to feel as though slavery was at war with democracy, trampling upon their own rights along with the rights of the enslaved. Young people decided they’d had enough.

A gawky 19-year-old textile clerk, Edgar Yergason, started it all. “Fastidious” about his clothes, Eddie prepared for a torch-lit rally of the antislaver­y Republican Party on Feb. 25, 1860, by fashioning a shiny black cape to protect his new coat from dripping torch-oil.

Yergason’s fellow clerks made capes, too. This oddly uniformed corps led a march through Hartford that night, while their friends beat back a mob of proslavery Democrats.

Slavery’s threat to democracy

Proud of their costumes and their fighting skills, Eddie’s friends met in a dingy third-floor apartment to formalize their associatio­n. After selecting a brawny 27-year-old leader for their “captain,” they cast about for a name.

One fellow shouted: “Why not name it ‘Republican Wide Awakes?’” It was time that they wake up to the threat slavery posed to democracy.

Their “army” of young civilians — clerks and farm boys and apprentice blacksmith­s — spread from coast to coast. Uniting in “companies” drilled by “captains,” young people joined together, energized by this militarist­ic sense of awakening.

In an age of rowdy, boozy politics, the Wide Awakes stood out for their stoic, silent midnight marches, not exactly fun but stirring and spectacula­r. In an age of chaos, their discipline sent a political message.

Wide Awake companies fought as bodyguards for Republican anti-slavery speakers, escorting Lincoln and many others. Bloodied young men, still in their signature cape sand caps, sat on stage at rallies as proof of the anti democratic forces aligned against them.

This anger joined strange bedfellows. Before 1860, teetotalin­g Yankee abolitioni­sts disliked beer-drinking German radicals, who hated Know Nothing gang members, who shunned African American fugitives, who distrusted antislaver­y Southerner­s.

But a shared enmity toward the Slave Power united them all. They shared what historian Henry Adams later called “the systemic organizati­on of hatreds” at the root of politics.

Lewis Hayden, who had escaped slavery in Kentucky, led a company of Black Wide Awakes in Boston in the same movement as the nastily racist Frank Blair Jr. in St. Louis. Some Wide Awakes were truly admirable, others quite distastefu­l, but all were united under Yergason’s cape design.

The Wide Awakes claimed to have “no warlike intentions,” but Democrats were skeptical. In the North, Democratic newspapers legitimate­ly worried that “politico-military” clubs would mean “our elections will become pitched battles.”

Across the South, panicked newspapers spread wild, violent rumors. One ex-governor told Virginians that they would soon be “cut to pieces by the Wide Awakes.”

On Election Day, club members woke up communitie­s with 5 a.m. fireworks, then marched to the polls. Turnout was high: 81%. By the end of the day, Lincoln had won an unusual victory, taking nearly 60% of the electoral vote but less than 40% of the popular

vote in a four-way race.

This awkward mandate meant that for all the Republican­s talk of “majority rule,” no one could really bring unity, or even basic agreement, in such a fractured land. But the Wide Awakes lit Lincoln’s plurality with torchlight, until the movement’s shadow loomed larger than the actual Republican Party.

Potent politics

Many agreed with the New York Tribune’s assessment that the Wide Awakes were “the most imposing, influentia­l and potent political organizati­on, which ever existed in this country.”

As the nation spiraled toward the Civil War, Wide Awake clubs armed as paramilita­ry forces, who did some of the first fighting in the conflict. And their members enlisted in huge numbers in the Union Army that finally killed slavery.

Today, progressiv­e activists online sometimes name-check the Wide Awakes, styling them as woke heroes from the past. But they were really something more complex — and more thrilling: a genuine coalition of people who couldn’t agree on much but who marched side-by-side against the greatest threat to democracy.

 ?? Library of Congress Prints and Photograph­s Division ?? The grand procession of Wide Awakes in New York City on Oct. 3, 1860. The unofficial group became the strongest political force opposing slavery and supporting the candidacy and then presidency of Abraham Lincoln.
Library of Congress Prints and Photograph­s Division The grand procession of Wide Awakes in New York City on Oct. 3, 1860. The unofficial group became the strongest political force opposing slavery and supporting the candidacy and then presidency of Abraham Lincoln.
 ?? ?? Library of Congress Prints/Photograph­s Division A membership certificat­e for the Wide Awake Club.
Library of Congress Prints/Photograph­s Division A membership certificat­e for the Wide Awake Club.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States