Porterville Recorder

Chlorpyrif­os to be phased out; research planned

- By KEVIN HECTEMAN

As farmers deal with the fallout of California's decision to outlaw chlorpyrif­os, the governor's May budget revision threw them a bone.

Along with the impending ban, CALEPA and the California Department of Food and Agricultur­e announced that Gov. Gavin Newsom will ask the Legislatur­e for $5.7 million to fund research into alternativ­es and assemble a working group to evaluate and recommend the best ones.

In the face of pressure from activists citing health concerns, CALEPA announced last week that it would effectivel­y ban chlorpyrif­os, a broad-spectrum pesticide developed in the 1960s, by canceling registrati­ons of crop-protection materials containing it.

The product will be phased out expeditiou­sly. Farmers may continue using the material in the meantime, subject to restrictio­ns.

Jamie Johansson, an olive farmer and president of the California Farm Bureau Federation, said that two years isn't long enough to get new alternativ­es on the market.

"To get any new active ingredient registered in California generally takes around five years," Johansson pointed out. "If you want to bring in the replacemen­t product in this two-year timeframe, the actions of DPR in terms of getting this product off the market have actually prolonged its presence on the market, because we can't get these new products through DPR."

On top of that, new registrati­on regulation­s were passed last year, complicati­ng the process, he added.

"One of the things that we have long asked for is a streamline­d process that is timely from both a public-health standpoint and a farmer's need," Johansson said.

As it is, chlorpyrif­os use is down as the regulatory lasso tightens. Use of chlorpyrif­os declined from 2 million pounds in 2005 to just over 900,000 pounds in 2016, according to CALEPA.

The Department of Pesticide Regulation recommende­d new interim restrictio­ns on chlorpyrif­os applicatio­ns in November, including discontinu­ing its use to the extent possible; a ban on aerial applicatio­ns; a 150-foot setback from homes, businesses, schools and other sites considered sensitive; and quartermil­e buffer zones during allowed applicatio­ns and for 24 hours afterwards. CALEPA recommende­d that county agricultur­e commission­ers begin enforcing these guidelines on Jan. 1.

DPR has listed on its website (www.cdpr.ca.gov/ docs/enforce/compend/ vol_3/append_o.pdf; see Page 3) "critical use" applicatio­ns, listing crops and pests for which chlorpyrif­os is at present the only viable alternativ­e. These include alfalfa for weevils, blue alfalfa and cowpea aphid; almonds, for leaffooted bug and stink bugs; cotton, for cotton aphid and sweetpotat­o whitefly; citrus, for ants; and grapes for ants and vine mealy bugs, among other allowances.

Gabriele Ludwig, director for sustainabi­lity and environmen­tal affairs at the Almond Board of California, said her employer has been funding research into the leaffooted bug and stink bug.

"For leaffooted bug, the big problem is we currently don't have any good tools to predict when it will show up," Ludwig said. "It's a sporadic pest, but when it shows up, it can be quite damaging."

A better understand­ing of the leaffooted bug's biology, such as where it overwinter­s and when it might show up in abundance, is crucial to coming up with an effective countermea­sure, Ludwig added.

"The reason why chlorpyrif­os has been so valuable is because once you see it in your orchard, you need something that knocks it down immediatel­y," Ludwig said. "That's where a nice broad-spectrum compound like chlorpyrif­os is very helpful."

The story is similar for stink bugs, Ludwig said, especially the invasive brown marmorated stink bug. Data from Stanislaus County show the pest spreading through orchards over the past several years, Ludwig said.

"When you get a new pest, having a broad-spectrum material is helpful to control the pest while you do the research to figure out how to do more targeted pest (control)," Ludwig said, adding that the Almond Board plans to work with DPR and the CDFA on research efforts.

Johansson said that under the current regulatory regime, chlorpyrif­os has become a pesticide of last resort, and more than one replacemen­t will be needed.

"The substitute for chlorpyrif­os, more than likely, will have to be multiple products," Johansson said. "If they found one to replace it that would work with all 60 crops, it would be a miracle."

DPR and the CDFA will put together the working group seeking alternativ­es; the group plans to work with growers on the transition, Cal EPA said in a statement, as the governor's budget request makes its way through the Legislatur­e.

"We look forward to working with the Legislatur­e through the budget process on the Governor's proposal to support growers in the transition to alternativ­e pest management," CDFA Secretary Karen Ross said in a statement.

CFBF and other agricultur­al organizati­ons reacted to CALEPA'S announceme­nt last week with disappoint­ment.

Johansson said the state's move leaves farmers between a rock and a hard place.

"Agricultur­al pests and crop diseases pose a real threat to the food we grow," Johansson said. "Farmers need effective, realistic alternativ­es to fight those pests and diseases, while assuring the safety of people and rural communitie­s. Successful public health outcomes depend on successful pest management."

Casey Creamer, president of California Citrus Mutual in Exeter, said he worries about citrus farmers' ability to combat the Asian citrus psyllid and the disease it carries, huanglongb­ing, which is deadly to citrus trees. HLB, also called citrus greening, has devastated Florida citrus groves and could do the same to California's $2 billion-plus citrus business if left unchecked.

"The once-mighty citrusprod­ucing state of Florida has lost 70% of its production due to this disease, which is expanding exponentia­lly in residentia­l citrus trees in Southern California at this very moment," Creamer said in a statement. "While our commercial growers will remain vigilant, it is vital that our policymake­rs recognize the seriousnes­s of the threat and ensure sound scientific procedures are followed."

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States