Porterville Recorder

Olympics to go on, but in name only

- By PAUL NEWBERRY AP Sports Columnist

In 1964, less than two decades removed from World War II, Japan used the Summer Olympics to showcase its astonishin­g recovery from a horrific defeat.

It was an undeniable triumph for the host nation.

This time, the Tokyo Games will be a multibilli­on-dollar test of survival in the midst of a lingering pandemic.

Despite the mixed messages coming from top officials, not to mention the steadfast opposition of the vast majority of Japanese citizens, these Olympics will take place this summer.

There’s too much money at stake for there to be any other outcome.

But it’s clear this will be an Olympics in name only, stripped of the joy and charm and lofty ideals that make it a tradition unlike any other (sorry, Masters), leaving only the stench of well-deserved cynicism.

Forget about tens of thousands of people from every corner of the globe transformi­ng the streets of Tokyo into a potpourri of humanity. Foreign fans are not allowed.

Forget about the athletes hanging around to absorb the culture and cuisine of the hosts

once their competitio­ns are over. They’re being told to arrive late and get out of town as soon as possible. (Of course, Ryan Lochte probably wishes he had followed that advice in Rio.)

Forget about the stories that would’ve been shared in the years to come — the frenzied bartering of the pin traders, the embarrasse­d remembranc­es of far too much money dropped in the Olympic superstore, the chance encounter that opened your heart to someone who looked and sounded different.

For Katie Ledecky, one of the most enduring memories of her two previous Olympics was having NBA stars from the U.S. men’s basketball team turn up in the stands when she was swimming for gold.

In 2016, it was Kevin Durant, Kyle Lowry, Draymond Green, Klay Thompson, Demarcus Cousins and Deandre Jordan who transforme­d into awestruck fans as they cheered on Ledecky and Michael Phelps.

Afterward, they all posed for pictures.

“They typically come to at least one of our sessions at the Olympics,” Ledecky said ruefully. “I know this year it probably won’t be able to happen.”

With coronaviru­s cases surging in Japan, the prospect of canceling an Olympics that already has been pushed back a year was raised again this week by a leading politician.

Toshihiro Nikai, the No. 2 person in the ruling political party, was asked during an interview if cancellati­on was still an option.

“Of course,” he replied, adding that if the Tokyo Games piled on to the misery already wreaked by COVID-19 “there would be no meaning to having the Olympics.”

But the swiftness with which Nikai backtracke­d and a bunch of other powerful officials jumped in to say his comments were off the mark only solidified the reality that these games are going forward — no matter what happens in the next three months.

“There are a variety of concerns but as the Tokyo 2020 organizing committee we are not thinking about canceling the games,” said Seiko Hashimoto, who heads up the Tokyo organizing committee.

But Hashimoto acknowledg­ed that Nikai has a right to be concerned, and that sort of thinking is right in line with a Japanese public that has polled as high as 80% against holding the Olympics during the pandemic.

“His comment has reminded us of how tedious it was for us to feel confident or be fully prepared for delivering the games,” Hashimoto said.

Though there will surely be socially distanced fans in the stands — Japan has allowed people to attend sporting events since last summer — these Olympics will essentiall­y be a made-fortv event.

Everyone from the athletes and coaches to officials and the media will be on virtual lockdown during their time in Japan, restricted largely to the stadiums and arenas where the events are held and the rooms where they will lay their heads at night.

That is good enough for the Internatio­nal Olympic Committee, which relies on internatio­nal broadcast fees for nearly threefourt­hs of its revenue. Besides, TV is the conduit through which nearly everyone except a lucky few gets to experience the games, so a cancellati­on would leave a giant void in the summer programmin­g schedule.

Frankly, its understand­able that Japanese officials want to press forward, considerin­g how much the country has laid out to prepare for the world’s grandest boondoggle — at least $15 billion officially, with audits suggesting the actual figure might be twice as much.

And, of course, the athletes desperatel­y want to compete, no matter what restrictio­ns are are placed on them. This is a moment that usually comes around only once every four years, and they’ve already had to tack on an extra year of training, preparatio­n and expense just to take part in the Tokyo Games.

When a British newspaper suggested in January that the Olympics might be canceled, U.S. gymnastics star Simone Biles undoubtedl­y expressed the mindset of all her fellow athletes.

“I’ll basically do anything at this moment,” Biles told NBC. “Whatever they say they want us to do, I’m in 100%, because I’ve been training so hard, and I’ve just been so ready.”

Sadly, no matter how the IOC tries to spin it, everyone in the Pandemic Games will be walking on eggshells until the flame is extinguish­ed on Aug, 8.

Only then can the celebratio­n really begin.

Or, more likely, nothing more than a giant sigh of relief.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States