Portsmouth Herald

Stand up for access to medication abortion, pass HCR 11

- Your Turn

As we approach spring, the looming challenge to the Food and Drug Administra­tion's approval of mifepristo­ne at the US Supreme Court casts a shadow over abortion access in New Hampshire. This case, which will be heard in late March, could have immediate and profound implicatio­ns for abortion access in New Hampshire and across the nation.

Mifepristo­ne, the first of two drugs used in medication abortion and available up until the 11th week of pregnancy, secured FDA approval over two decades ago. Since then, it has been used by more than five million people in the U.S. to safely end their pregnancie­s, and is used in over half of all abortions in the United States. That number is even higher in Northern New England where, according to Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, about 70% of their abortion patients choose medication abortion. Medication abortion has been an essential option for Granite Staters allowing patients to make their private medical decisions on their own terms. Now, this access is at grave risk. I'm calling on my colleagues in the New Hampshire State House to stand up for access to medication abortion and pass HCR 11, a resolution which condemns medically unnecessar­y restrictio­ns on medication abortion, without delay. Here's why.

First, New Hampshire has a long tradition of supporting the right to privacy in medical decisions and abortion access that extends to today. In 1991, New Hampshire led the nation and became the first state to pass a resolution recognizin­g the importance of mifepristo­ne access and urging the FDA to begin clinical trials. Granite Staters remain staunch supporters of abortion rights. A recent survey from Breakthrou­gh Campaigns found that a supermajor­ity of Granite Staters - 87% - support reproducti­ve freedom. This support for reproducti­ve rights in New Hampshire transcends party lines. New Hampshire presidenti­al primary exit polling found that 54 percent of New Hampshire Republican­s believe that abortion should be legal and accessible in all or most cases.

Second, New Hampshire should never be in the position where judges in Texas are deciding what safe and effective FDA-approved medicines Granite Staters should be able to access. Disappoint­ingly, while other New England governors have rallied behind an amicus brief supporting this critical medication, the Sununu administra­tion has refused to act, and has remained silent on this national abortion litigation that will have direct and significan­t impacts on Granite Staters' ability to access abortion early in pregnancy. Now, HCR 11 represents the only remaining concrete step for New Hampshire to take to reaffirm its commitment to medication abortion access. By doing nothing, New Hampshire is effectivel­y ceding control over our medical decisions to a judge in Texas.

Finally, the ramificati­ons of this case extend far beyond abortion care. This case could potentiall­y stifle medical innovation and jeopardize the nation's science-based drug approval process. A ban on mifepristo­ne could unravel the entire drug approval system, casting a shadow of uncertaint­y over all approved medication­s and subjecting them to partisan ideology. The politiciza­tion of medical decisions sets a dangerous precedent, and will without a doubt erode public trust in the integrity of drug regulation and will jeopardize patients' health and safety. Other drugs like mifepristo­ne, which is also used for miscarriag­e management, care for uterine fibroids, and ectopic pregnancie­s, could get caught up in political crosshairs. We cannot afford to allow ideologica­l agendas to dictate medical practice or what medicines are available in our state or country. Patients deserve unfettered access to the medication they need, free from unnecessar­y interferen­ce from judges or politician­s. Health care providers must be empowered to offer essential medical care without fear of arbitrary or political restrictio­ns. Passing HCR 11 is not a symbolic gesture; it's a concrete step that New Hampshire can and should take to demonstrat­e our state's and our people's commitment to reproducti­ve rights and health care autonomy. By passing HCR 11, we can reaffirm New Hampshire's long-standing support for reproducti­ve rights, privacy in medical decisions, and the fundamenta­l civil rights of its citizens.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States