Post Tribune (Sunday)

Russian pipeline dispute testing Biden’s outreach

Lawmakers demand sanctions as US vies for Europe’s favor

- By Matthew Lee

WASHINGTON — Pressure is growing on President Joe Biden to take action to prevent the completion of a Russian gas pipeline to Europe that many fear will give the Kremlin significan­t leverage over U.S. partners and allies. Yet such action could provoke an enormous rift in trans-Atlantic relations, notably with Germany, at a time when Biden has made restoring good ties with Europe a priority.

As the Nord Stream 2 pipeline nears completion, U.S. lawmakers from both parties have stepped up demands on a reluctant White House to impose new sanctions on Russian and European companies to halt the project. But prospects of that happening would seem slim: Germany continues to support the project as it steps up consumptio­n of natural gas, and the pipeline is roughly 95% finished.

Biden has said he opposes the pipeline, which is owned by Russian state company Gazprom, with investment from several European companies. He has been keen to portray himself as tough on Russian President Vladimir Putin while being a strong supporter of Eastern European countries like Poland and Ukraine that are dead set against it as it bypasses both.

Of potentiall­y greater concern to the U.S., the Russia-to-Germany pipeline would increase Western Europe’s already heavy dependence on Russian energy while U.S.-Russian tensions are soaring over a number of issues, including Ukraine, election interferen­ce, cyber intrusions and the crackdown on opposition figure Alexei Navalny and his supporters.

At the same time, the administra­tion is seeking broad European support — especially from Germany, the continent’s economic powerhouse — for its planned withdrawal from Afghanista­n, climate change measures and efforts to counter China’s increasing­ly global assertiven­ess. It’s not clear if sanctions targeting businesses from Germany and elsewhere would undermine efforts to advance those goals and repair relations that were frayed during Donald Trump’s presidency.

On Wednesday, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee unanimousl­y signed off on legislatio­n that would require the administra­tion to either impose sanctions on 20 companies involved in the pipeline’s financing and constructi­on or explain why they deserve exemptions. In January, the Trump administra­tion hit several Russian firms and ships with penalties for their involvemen­t, but Biden has not expanded the list.

The legislatio­n was sponsored by vocal administra­tion critic Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas. But it also won support from some of Biden’s strongest Democratic foreign policy supporters in the Senate, like committee chair Bob Menendez of New Jersey, Chris Coons of Delaware and Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire.

“As we see Putin trying to eliminate his biggest opposition leader, Navalny, in prison, the best shot we can make is to stop the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, if we are going to get his attention,” Shaheen said.

Democrats agreed to support the sanctions after Republican­s promised to drop opposition to two of Biden’s top State Department nominees. The bipartisan support suggests the administra­tion will be hardpresse­d to ignore it. Biden was stung by criticism in February for not expanding on the Trump administra­tion’s sanctions.

“We share an overall attitude towards Nord Stream 2 with many on Capitol Hill, and that is the position that it is a bad deal,” State Department spokespers­on Ned Price said Thursday. “We will continue to do everything we can, including consistent with legislatio­n that’s already on the books, to oppose its constructi­on and finalizati­on.”

But the administra­tion has yet to take a position on the new legislatio­n, which congressio­nal aides on both sides of the aisle believe has a good chance of passing. It would give Biden 15 days from the date of passage to make a determinat­ion on whether to hit the 20 companies with sanctions.

The sanctions — which would apply to German, Russian, Polish and Austrian entities — would freeze their assets, make it difficult for them to do any internatio­nal business and possibly affect their executives.

Even if Biden vetoes the legislatio­n, he will face another deadline for action in May when the State Department must submit to Congress an update on the administra­tion’s compliance with previous laws aimed at protecting European energy security that require sanctions on unspecifie­d companies involved in the constructi­on of the pipeline that bypasses Poland and Ukraine.

On Tuesday, Chancellor Angela Merkel defended Germany’s cooperatio­n with Russia on Nord Stream 2. She noted that Russian gas already flows freely into Europe along other routes, including the existing Nord Stream 1 pipeline.

“I would like to point out that the gas delivered through Nord Stream 2, which isn’t yet flowing, is no worse than the gas from Nord Stream 1, that which flows through Ukraine, and that which comes across Turkey from Russia,” Merkel said.

 ?? JENS BUETTNER/DPA ?? Tugboats get into position in January on the Russian pipe-laying vessel Fortuna in the port of Wismar, Germany. The vessel is being used for constructi­on work on the German-Russian Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline in the Baltic Sea.
JENS BUETTNER/DPA Tugboats get into position in January on the Russian pipe-laying vessel Fortuna in the port of Wismar, Germany. The vessel is being used for constructi­on work on the German-Russian Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline in the Baltic Sea.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States