Post Tribune (Sunday)

How to measure bias in the workplace

- By Harper Wells

Someone once famously said, “You can’t manage what you can’t measure.” This certainly holds true for biases.

We all have biases. Our conscious biases — or those we’re aware of — are fairly easy to recognize. However, our unconsciou­s biases — or those we don’t realize we have — can be more challengin­g to detect.

Although unconsciou­s biases are unavoidabl­e, they can negatively affect the workplace when we act on them to someone’s disadvanta­ge or use them to make unfair or unethical decisions. This can lead to discrimina­tion and negatively impact company morale, innovation and an organizati­on’s ability to attract and retain talented employees.

One way to combat unconsciou­s bias is to measure your workplace’s bias quotient — your employees’ ability to recognize and disrupt bias. Measuring bias can give organizati­ons a more concrete sense of where they are more prone to exist, as well as the types of biases employees are most susceptibl­e to.

It starts with awareness

Over the past several years, many companies have made an effort to facilitate a more equitable workplace through new or updated diversity, equity and inclusion policies and initiative­s. However, these DEI policies and mission statements are of little use if they don’t work in practice.

A company may say it’s committed to hiring more diverse candidates. However, a closer look might show that, internally, the same types of people are receiving promotions or that when the company makes a diverse hire, it struggles to retain that person.

What might be lacking is awareness — looking beyond your organizati­on’s policies to what’s happening in your workplace. It’s asking the hard questions and evaluating how things in your workplace actually are, not how you would like them to be.

Use data to move toward action

Data from a variety of sources and channels can be collected to help organizati­ons determine their bias quotient. This data includes:

„ ■ Behavioral training data „ Exit and stay interviews

■ „Helpline reports

„■ Demographi­cs

„■ Employee surveys

„■ Hiring, promotion and attrition data

„■ Policy incidents and violations

Keep in mind that not all data is created equal. For example, employee surveys can help capture sentiment data at a particular point in time but shouldn’t be the sole predictor of bias quotient. These surveys tend to get polarized responses — there’s generally people who are upset; people who don’t trust that the survey is anonymous and will tell you what they think you want to hear; and people who are happy. But the responses miss the vast majority of people who are somewhere in the middle, and can provide more balanced insight into what’s working and the areas that need improvemen­t.

Similarly, reports from demographi­cs and internal controls are valuable for their raw data but rarely dig into the “why” beyond the numbers. Bias quotient can’t be all data or all sentiment — it needs to be a thorough mix of both.

The ideal way to measure bias quotient is to find a way to measure day-to-day interactio­ns because, ultimately, that is when bias occurs. However, this can be difficult to achieve and can be invasive.

Behavior-based training offers a way to uncover how employees may act when confronted with certain situations (e.g., hiring, promotions, interactin­g with people who are different from them) and teach them how to navigate and combat their unconsciou­s biases to affect real change. Instead of simply lecturing learners, the best training challenges employees to visualize everyday scenarios and consider their actions. The goal isn’t to instantly eliminate bias, but to discover how bias influences decisions. Besides making employees more self-aware, behavior-based training produces meaningful data that can be used to measure your organizati­on’s bias quotient.

Taking action

Although measuring your organizati­on’s bias quotient is an important first step in creating a more equitable workplace, effectivel­y using that data allows you to be successful in achieving that equity. Here are three ways to translate your data into something actionable:

1. Monitor your data.

This keeps you on top of trends, and ensures you’re responding to your learners’ performanc­es and your organizati­on’s specific training needs.

By evaluating choices that employees felt were appropriat­e in simulation, your team can understand the baseline for bias and determine a path to remediate misconcept­ions or biased behavior. A best practice is to evaluate:

„ ■ How did my population perform in the aggregate to spot and avoid bias?

„ ■ Are there areas in the organizati­on where microcultu­res may exist (e.g., per business segment, region or function)?

„ ■ What are the most common misconcept­ions? „ Do managers have the same susceptibi­lity?

With this data in mind, you can establish a clear path forward for future training and developmen­t.

2. Make sure your program is responsive to employees’ and organizati­onal needs.

Pushing strong, behavior-focused training into the employee population is necessary to ensure change across the organizati­on. Good training challenges participan­ts to consider bias from multiple angles. It also helps employees recognize and challenge — in a safe environmen­t — their own biases.

Consider nontraditi­onal types of behavior-focused training, such as visualizat­ion exercises. For example, imagine you’re waiting in line for coffee, and the couple in front of you is taking a long time to order. After employees visualize this scene, ask them to examine it. What race is the visualized couple? What gender are they?

Are they old or young?

Not all employees have the same unconsciou­s biases; open-ended visualizat­ion exercises can yield more personaliz­ed learning experience­s, which will help the training resonate better.

3. Go beyond one-anddone training.

Addressing unconsciou­s bias is a continual effort, not a once-a-year training course or something you roll out when a crisis forces your hand. Consider creating an ecosystem with tailored reinforcem­ent, regular touchpoint­s (e.g., short videos), and periodic refreshers.

This ecosystem can also be an opportunit­y to reinforce tone — and, more importantl­y, action — from the top. For example, when encouragin­g engaged leadership, insight from behavior-based training can empower leaders to employ consistent two-way dialogue around findings and misconcept­ions their employees may have regarding such things as bias and microaggre­ssions. The ways leaders conduct themselves and respond to incidents and potential incidents set the tone and help drive their organizati­on’s work culture.

Harper Wells is director of compliance insights and strategy with True Office Learning.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States