Post Tribune (Sunday)

Cheering on the Big Quit? Just wait for the Big Backfire

- By Michael Walters

Covid has taught us a lot of things. It’s taught us that people can really freak out over toilet paper. It’s also taught us that we don’t need to be in offices to be effective at jobs that were previously thought to be exclusivel­y in-person roles.

The new digital business landscape has enabled more free time, more flexibilit­y and a stronger feeling of control over our work lives. Now that people have a taste of what’s possible, they don’t want to go back to what was. They don’t want to go back to commutes, to real pants, to giving up most of their waking hours to sit in an uncomforta­ble office when they could be on their sofa, running a load of laundry, walking the dog, signing for FedEx packages and waiting for the HVAC technician while still getting their jobs done well.

You’ve read the statistics. People are quitting in record numbers. It’s been called the Big Quit, or in some circles, the Great Resignatio­n.

What’s more, those who are staying are demanding pay increases — on top of widespread minimum-wage hikes. It’s critical to note that generous unemployme­nt packages are perhaps contributi­ng to the Big Quit, but that’s only part of the story. Being forced back into the office isn’t the only reason, either. The shift to a digital business landscape means that people can, theoretica­lly, work for any company, from any location. No longer are they bound by commute times or even time zones.

In addition, people are realizing that they don’t need to be beholden to a single employer and a traditiona­l 9-to-5 role. The gig economy has exploded as everyone from entry-level workers to senior executives embrace fractional, contract or consulting roles where they can make more money working fewer hours for multiple companies.

This revolution has changed the landscape with these outcomes:

„ ■ Higher salaries

„ ■ Deeper benefits and retention packages

„ ■ Flexible work hours and locations

„ ■ Global access to jobs and opportunit­ies

„ ■ Expanded paid leave, personal days and sabbatical­s

„ ■ Increased minimum wage „ Added programs and policies to balance inequities and opportunit­ies

„ ■ Shifted allegiance from company to the individual

„ ■ Empowered resignatio­n and reset

Sounds good, right? The problem comes when we don’t recognize the consequenc­es of the collective decision to create these outcomes. And there are consequenc­es.

The Big Backfire

What’s the issue? As more people leave the workforce and as businesses add more costs, it adds pressure to those who stay, and also to the companies who need to continue to operate. Those who remain find ways to fill the gaps and pick up the slack, while companies are forced to become more efficient.

When companies face extreme labor shortages, increased salary-and-benefit requiremen­ts and a constant flux of their employment base, they can’t just throw wage increases at the problem until they find someone willing to do the job. That money has to come from somewhere. It ultimately gets passed on to consumers. But until that inevitabil­ity, companies will have to look for ways to continue to service clients and customers to avoid losing business with major customers who aren’t willing to accept cost increases, or those who require months of notice to enact an increase.

During that time, customers also look to outsource or find alternativ­e suppliers to avoid increases. That means the cost increase could cost the company its business with core customers and could eliminate the business overall, which reduces jobs at all levels.

That inflection point is coming, and the road to it has been paved with exorbitant prices for basic necessitie­s like gas and groceries. Consumers will complain that it’s untenable, and those same consumers will have left their jobs or demanded compensati­on that directly contribute­s to the spike in companies’ cost of goods sold.

Technology enabled the digital business landscape that’s led to mass resignatio­ns: remote work, global Zoom and Teams meetings, LinkedIn and career-networking platforms, and same-day delivery to our doors. That same technology will be exactly what decimates the job market.

What happens when companies reach the inflection point where human labor isn’t cost-effective? Businesses innovate. We automate, and we find labor in places on the earth where people want the jobs.

If you’re reading this, you’re probably in a role that you suspect is

In the same way people discovered that a wide variety of roles can be done from home, they’ll discover that a wide variety of roles can be automated or, at the very least, outsourced to places where wage expectatio­ns are substantia­lly lower.

immune to automation and outsourcin­g. And yet this isn’t going to impact only factories and other minimum-wage jobs. In the same way people discovered that a wide variety of roles can be done from home, they’ll discover that a wide variety of roles can be automated or, at the very least, outsourced to places where wage expectatio­ns are substantia­lly lower. Technology is quickly evolving to replicate nuanced, skilled job functions, e.g., “smart labor,” including creative roles, management and, ironically, IT and security. No one is immune.

Even if companies don’t want to go this route, a point will come when the longterm cost of attracting and retaining talent will make it necessary to reduce labor, outsource and automate.

From the warehouse to the corner office and everywhere in between, people who quit because they wanted something “better” will find that there’s nothing to return to. Innovation, automation and A.I. are all coming, regardless of the Big Quit. But the Big Quit is rapidly accelerati­ng this transition.

The solution

The obvious solution is for people to stay in their roles if they’re still adding value, and for companies to create an environmen­t that people want to be part of. But that’s easier said than done, and automation is already coming.

As for those of us hoping to have jobs in the future? The counterpoi­nt to automation is to provide what automation cannot, which are the human elements that make us truly indispensa­ble: passion, compassion, invention, inspiratio­n and dedication. Automation is inevitable, but it’s a long way from being human. It cannot supply human-level drive and intuition. Successful companies will continue to find ways to incorporat­e automation to enhance, not necessaril­y entirely replace, their workforce.

Those that don’t should get ready for the Big Backfire.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States