Press-Telegram (Long Beach)

Prop. 1 kills all limits on abortions

- By Jon Fleischman Jon Fleischman is a small business owner and the publisher of the FlashRepor­t website on California politics. He resides in Yorba Linda.

In November, you'll be asked if you want to dramatical­ly change California's abortion laws to allow a baby to be aborted right up until the minute before that baby is born.

Right now, a woman can have an abortion in California up to the point where the baby can survive outside the womb or is “viable.” Viability has been the standard for decades.

Based on polling, it is likely most California­ns are comfortabl­e with that viability standard. But legislativ­e Democrats are testing how far voters are willing to go to allow legal abortions up to a baby's due date.

That's what will be on the ballot this November in California with Propositio­n 1.

How did we get here? Much has been said about the recent 6-3 decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health Organizati­on that reversed previous court rulings and found that there was not a federal constituti­onal right to have an abortion. The court ultimately concluded: “Abortion presents a profound moral question. The Constituti­on does not prohibit the citizens of each State from regulating or prohibitin­g abortion.” With that decision, determinin­g public policy around the issue of abortion has been returned to each of the 50 states.

State responses — like the people who live in them — are wide, varied and diverse. According to a Gallup Organizati­on

survey of the opinions of Americans on the issue taken in late May of 2022, 35% said abortion should be legal under all circumstan­ces, 18% said legal under most circumstan­ces, 32% said legal only in a few circumstan­ces and 13% said all abortions should be illegal.

In other words, fully half of Americans chart a middle course on this issue. On the football field of politics, most Americans find themselves between the 35-yard lines.

California's approach, though, puts us next to the progressiv­e goal line. As a practical matter, the decision in Dobbs and the overturnin­g of Roe v. Wade has no effect on abortion rights in California. Up until viability (generally regarded as 24 weeks into a 40-week pregnancy), women can obtain abortions for any reason. The state subsidizes the procedure and has passed laws encouragin­g “abortion tourism.”

But the modest restrictio­n precluding abortion after viability (unless done for the health of the mother) would be eliminated if voters pass a constituti­onal amendment that has been placed before us by the Democrat-controlled state Legislatur­e.

Propositio­n 1 on the California ballot would place these words into the state constituti­on: “The state shall not deny or interfere with an individual's reproducti­ve freedom in their most intimate decisions, which includes their fundamenta­l right to choose to have an abortion and their fundamenta­l right to choose or refuse contracept­ives.”

With the passage of this amendment, abortion in California would become legal until the moment of birth. The explicit language in this amendment could not be clearer and provides no exceptions or restrictio­ns on a right to an abortion. This is the most extreme position that could be taken on this issue.

Why is Propositio­n 1 even on the ballot? It represents a convergenc­e of two interests. Proabortio­n extremists want to not only ensure abortion is legal in California until birth, while guaranteei­ng that at no time in the future can laws on abortion access be reduced. Progressiv­es would also like to shift the debate away from issues like cost of living, high gas prices or rising crime ahead of the election.

California­ns are passionate about the state of human rights around the world, rightly outraged at abuses in some countries that make our stomachs turn. With Propositio­n 1 we would become more radical than countries we abhor. What kind of a state would guarantee the right for a healthy, pregnant mother to get an abortion the very day her child is due? We can and should be better than that and reject abortion extremism.

 ?? RICH PEDRONCELL­I — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon, left, Senate President Pro Term Toni Atkins , center, and state Sen. Nancy Skinner, D-Berkeley, right, listens as members speak on a measure to put a constituti­onal amendment on the November ballot that would guarantee the right to an abortion and contracept­ives on June 27.
RICH PEDRONCELL­I — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon, left, Senate President Pro Term Toni Atkins , center, and state Sen. Nancy Skinner, D-Berkeley, right, listens as members speak on a measure to put a constituti­onal amendment on the November ballot that would guarantee the right to an abortion and contracept­ives on June 27.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States