Press-Telegram (Long Beach)

AG Rob Bonta's posturing on privacy

- Jon Coupal Columnist Jon Coupal is president of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Associatio­n.

Examples of hypocrisy in politics are common but in California they are legion. Take Gov. Newsom for example. During the pandemic, he lectured California­ns to stay home and wear masks while he dined unmasked at a fancy

Napa Valley restaurant. And just last weekend, it was revealed that he was vacationin­g in Montana, a state which is on California's “no state funds to travel to” list because of its discrimina­tory policies against LGBTQ people.

Despite Newsom's “do-asI-say-not-as-I-do” arrogance, the winner for this month's hypocrisy award must go to California's Attorney General Rob Bonta. Ever since his appointmen­t to office by Gov. Newsom, Bonta has crusaded on the issue of consumer privacy. In a March 7 press release he promised that data privacy would be an “enforcemen­t priority,” citing the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), a bill he enthusiast­ically supported as a legislator.

Other examples where Bonta has claimed to be a champion of privacy include a May 26 press release stating that those who create health-related apps have a legal obligation “to protect reproducti­ve health informatio­n.” Another press release from January touts his putting on notice businesses which have “loyalty” programs such as rewards for providing additional data.

In his own words, Bonta has said that the “Enforcemen­t of the CCPA marks an enormous step for privacy protection in California.” But Bonta's zealous protection of privacy seems to be selective. Just a few weeks ago, Bonta released a broad range of data related to firearms “to increase transparen­cy and informatio­n sharing.” We're all for transparen­cy, but it's hard to ignore the double standard being applied here, especially when it comes to personal informatio­n which, if disclosed, could cause injury to thousands of California­ns.

While Bonta imposes strict requiremen­ts on the private sector to guard private informatio­n, his office made an embarrassi­ng, and potentiall­y deadly, disclosure. When a California Department of Justice (DOJ)'s 2022 Firearms Dashboard Portal went online, it made accessible the names, addresses and other personal informatio­n of CCW (concealed carry weapon) permit holders. While the error was reversed within a short time frame, it is unknown who may have been able to download the informatio­n. Bonta admitted that “the incident exposed the personal informatio­n of individual­s who were granted or denied a CCW permit between 20112021: “For CCW permit holders and applicants, informatio­n disclosed includes full name, date of birth, address, gender, race, CCW license number, California Informatio­n Index number (which is automatica­lly generated during a fingerprin­t check for a CCW or for another purpose), and other government-issued identifier­s. In some cases, exposed informatio­n may also include driver's license number, and internal codes correspond­ing to the statutory reason that a person is prohibited from possessing a firearm.”

It is unlikely that the release of personal informatio­n was intentiona­l on Bonta's part, and he has issued a full mea culpa. But this incident reveals that it is dangerous to pontificat­e on a political issue that, when things go wrong, it looks even worse. Bonta states that he has launched an investigat­ion and we hope there are consequenc­es for the serious breach, but we doubt there will be.

After all, the offenders are government bureaucrat­s, not private individual­s or businesses. Those in government invariably get a free pass for incompeten­ce or, as here, illegal behavior.

Bonta says he is “deeply disturbed and angered” about this breach. So are we, Mr. Bonta, and we'll wait to see if you do anything about it.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States