Press-Telegram (Long Beach)

L.A. County voters have sent scofflaw sheriffs a warning

- Tom Elias Columnist Email Thomas Elias at tdelias@ aol.com.

Los Angeles County voters have just sent a powerful and threatenin­g message to scofflaw sheriffs all around California: Enforce the laws, even ones you don't like, or you may not hold your office much longer.

They did this in two emphatic ways: First, they defeated the state's leading scofflaw sheriff,

Alex Villanueva, by more than 18 percentage points, more than 320,000 votes. Then, a short distance down their ballots, they voted by an overwhelmi­ng 69% majority to allow firing of future sheriffs if 80% of their county's supervisor­s vote for an ouster.

That local propositio­n, known as Measure A, specified that sheriffs can only be canned if they break laws, flagrantly neglect their duties, misappropr­iate funds, falsify documents or obstruct an investigat­ion. Villanueva has been informally charged with almost all of these.

Villanueva may have been the most obviously egregious of California's scofflaw lawmen and women, with his well publicized refusals to enforce COVID-19 quarantine­s and masking, trying to obstruct the work of the county's oversight commission, condoning deputy gangs and more, but he was far from the only sheriff exposed during the height of the pandemic.

Refusal by sheriffs and police chiefs to enforce state law was most common during the height of COVID-19 infections, which so far have killed more than 93,000 California­ns. At the end of 2020, before COVID-19 vaccines began cutting down cases and hospitaliz­ations, at least two dozen law enforcemen­t agencies were refusing to observe or enforce emergency stay-at-home, crowd-size and masking orders from state and local public health officers.

Of the five counties with the highest seven-day average COVID-19 caseload in the week leading up to Christmas 2020, only one had taken strong enforcemen­t measures to protect its people.

Wherever those measures were enforced, they proved effective. Statistics show that if this state had pursued the laissez-faire, everything-stays-open approach used in Florida and some other states, more than 40,000 California­ns would be dead today.

But the scofflaw sheriffs didn't care. Villanueva was not moved to act, nor were sheriffs in nearby Orange, San Bernardino and Riverside counties, among others ranging as far north as Del Norte County on the Oregon border.

But nothing happened to Villanueva or the other refusing sheriffs until it was time for Villanueva to seek reelection this fall. That's when his political house came crashing down.

There is little doubt former Long Beach Police Chief Robert Luna, Villanueva's successor, will be far more circumspec­t, making sure to enforce even laws that are unpopular or inconvenie­nt, like the antiCOVID-19 tactics. But it's uncertain what might happen elsewhere. For example, Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco was reelected outright in the June 7 primary and has another four years in office.

But Measure A provides an example showing elected supervisor­s in other counties, who have never had much authority over sheriffs, that they, too, can bring recalcitra­nt law enforcemen­t kingpins to heel. That applies to reluctant law enforcers in counties from Sacramento to Imperial near the Mexican border.

Villanueva opposed Measure A as “an illegal motion that would allow corrupt supervisor­s to intimidate sheriffs from carrying out their official duties to investigat­e crime.” Of course, just after the November vote, he faced an investigat­ion of his own, the local district attorney now looking into allegation­s that he tried to dun his deputies for campaign donations once he realized his reelection was in doubt.

In any case, the vast majority of Los Angeles County voters did not heed Villanueva's protestati­ons and he will soon be gone. Whether he is prosecuted for corruption over allegedly seeking campaign money from deputies, with the implicit threat of punishment if they did not donate, remains uncertain.

But county supervisor­s who voted 4-1 to place Measure A on the ballot, said they believed he was guilty of at least three of the shortcomin­gs listed in the propositio­n as grounds for dismissal.

If Villanueva's loss and the easy passage of Measure A doesn't tell other sheriffs they must enforce even laws they don't like, it's hard to see what might.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States