Press-Telegram (Long Beach)

Never forget the victims of our wars

- By Sal Rodriguez Sal Rodriguez can be reached at salrodrigu­ez@scng.com

This past week, the United States military walked back its announceme­nt of a drone strike against a “senior al Qaeda leader” in Syria.

“At 11:42 am local Syrian time on 3 May, US Central Command Forces conducted a unilateral strike in Northwest Syria targeting a senior Al Qaeda leader,” tweeted CENTCOM a couple of weeks ago. “We will provide more informatio­n as operationa­l details become available.”

But it turns out that the person killed by the U.S. military wasn't an al-Qaida terrorist, but a 56-year old shepherd and father of 10 named Loutfi Hassan Mesto.

The Washington Post noted the shepherd's simple life: “Mesto's neighbors described his routines of drinking tea with family and friends, tending to his animals and leaving home mostly to pray at his mosque.”

Then one of America's freedom missiles struck.

“When we went over the mountain, we saw Loutfi dead with six of his sheep,” his brother told CNN.

The U.S. military: still losing hearts and minds, one civilian at a time.

These kids of killings and disregard for life have characteri­zed U.S. foreign policy for some time, especially in America's post-9/11 wars.

Around the same time as Loutfi's murder was circulatin­g, the Costs of War project out of Brown University released an updated tally of how many people have been killed in America's wars over the last 20 years. Tragically, researcher­s put the death toll as high as 4.5 million.

“Some people were killed in the fighting, but far more, especially children, have been killed by the reverberat­ing effects of war, such as the spread of disease,” the researcher­s note.

This devastatio­n, of course, has been a bipartisan affair. With the sort of exception of the MAGA right when it comes to U.S. support for Ukraine, Republican­s generally love war. Delusions of a West-versus-Islam existentia­l battle dominated right-wing imaginatio­ns for the first decade of the 2000s.

But maybe even more insidious has been Democratic support for the war machine. This includes President Joe Biden, who voted for the wars in Afghanista­n and Iraq. As did Pasadena Congressma­n Adam Schiff. As did Hillary Clinton. As did Sen. Dianne Feinstein. You know, the people who are considered decent, sensible liberals.

Even Nobel Peace Prize-winner Barack Obama was more than happy to help the Saudis bomb funerals and starve kids to death. At least Obama had the decency to publicly apologize for bombing a Doctors Without Borders hospital in Afghanista­n in October 2015, where dozens of people were killed. He wasn't sorry for the 2011 drone killing of 16-year old American citizen Abdulrahma­n al-Awlaki in Yemen.

Somewhere around here, some very confused anti-war people start trying to give former President Donald Trump credit for not starting a new war. And while they're right that he didn't start a new war, they leave out that Trump also didn't end any wars. He insisted on keeping the Obama-Saudi war in Yemen going (vetoing congressio­nal efforts to stop it), he ramped up violence in Afghanista­n (resulting in a spike in civilian deaths) and ramped up drone strikes in Somalia.

Fortunatel­y, President Biden scaled back U.S.-involvemen­t in Saudi Arabia's war in Yemen and ended the war in Afghanista­n (despite Republican whining).

But, clearly, the U.S. government's body count continues to climb because the U.S. perpetuall­y feels the need to stay militarily involved somewhere. And innocent people continue to pay the price.

Enough is enough.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States