How can you prove a signature forgery?
Q I am being sued over a contract. The signature is not mine. It looks like mine, to some degree, but I did not sign it and this is a scam. Just how is forgery proven? — B.W., Woodland Hills
AThe simplest way to demonstrate the signature is not yours is through an eye witness who saw the person committing the forgery. Since doing so may not be likely, a question arises: Is the person who signed claiming they were authorized to sign on your behalf? In that event, you want to disprove any purported authorization. It will help to show there is nothing valid to substantiate the authority, as well as if you could establish the person never had authority in any other instance on your behalf either.
The circumstances may be more complicated, however, because nowadays, with advances in technology, a skillful forger can create a document that looks very much like the real thing. Thus, a document examiner should be consulted and probably retained. This means bringing an expert witness on board.
Forensic document and handwriting experts will examine physical evidence to show alteration and/or simulation. The expert will want access to your actual signature, such as on original paperwork. Experts can compare signatures, but you could also have a situation in which a page was inserted into a document (in other words, a page was taken out and one inserted in its place).
Bottom line, forgery can be proven. But it can require some careful, credible work. It may be that a crime has been committed. Reporting the matter to the police should be considered.
QWe paid really good money for a painting. The artist is quite well known. Now we are told it could actually be a fake. How can we tell if it's a fake and if it is, what do we do? — L.L., Westchester
AForgery in the art field may be an art in and of itself. As such, it may not be sufficient to prove that an artwork is a fake based solely on visual examination. Modern-day investigation includes instrumental analysis and imaging. Does the material composition, for example, match what was available and used during the time period in which the work was supposedly created? Chemical analysis of pigments and the binding medium of the paint could also be in order.
If it turns out you bought a fake, then you may have recourse against the seller. It is an axiomatic legal principle that when you pay for something that turns out to have a want or lack of consideration, rescission may be available (in other words, you give back the painting in return for your money). Rescission can arise on a number of bases, including if the mistake is unilateral or mutual, or caused by fraud.
What I do not know (and need to rule out) is if you signed paperwork when you bought the painting that indicates you were taking a risk that the painting was not authentic, or words to that effect. Such a document may not be a solid defense for the seller, but if you are party to that kind of language, consultation with legal counsel is advisable. Also, what due diligence did you perform prior to the purchase? Were you led to believe by the seller the painting was indeed by that particular artist? Who said what? Were you alone duped, or was the seller duped as well?
Ron Sokol has been a practicing attorney for more than 40 years, and has also served many times as a judge pro tem, mediator and arbitrator. It is important to keep in mind that this column presents a summary of the law and is not to be treated or considered legal advice, let alone a substitute for actual consultation with a qualified professional.