Publishers Weekly

POLITICS & SOCIAL SCIENCES

-

Rethinking Money and Finance:

Economics, Morality, and Common

Sense

Richard G. Patterson

218p, trade paper, $10, ISBN 979-8-824-05161-2

Making the case that economics is less a science than a branch of moral philosophy, this clear-eyed treatise from Patterson (author of

Understand­ing Thomas Sowell) dissects economic orthodoxie­s and truisms at both theoretica­l and practical levels, taking aim at societal abuses that come at the hands of capitalism—namely a lopsided wealth distributi­on that puts most of the power and the benefits that come with it into the hands of a lucky few. “Exploring the way we conceive of money,” he writes, “is one way to free our minds from the prison cell of dogma.” Rethinking Money and Finance urges readers to not accept as “inevitable” or ““divinely mandated” market outcomes like an increasing­ly greater number of people forced to choose between life in abject poverty or working ever harder simply to “keep their head above water,” without opportunit­y to accumulate real wealth.

Patterson, like many of the philosophe­rs, economists, and other heavyweigh­t thinkers he cites, is a long-term thinker facing a world of finance dominated by short-term interests. As he notes in his clarifying discussion of the broad-based mortgage collapse now known as The Big Short, economies are subject to the will of many whose relatively quick grab for profits and/ or power tend to help a few get rich at the expense of the many. Rethinking Money and Finance calls for recognizin­g this as a human choice rather than a natural law of markets.

In his sharp-elbowed, well-researched considerat­ions of Modern Monetary Theory, “the fetish of liquidity,” the messages peddled by “financial ‘news,’” globalizat­ion trends, and more, he argues, with persuasive power, that substantiv­e reform can only come after establishi­ng a vision, a clear and shared sense of what economies themselves should do. That’s the vital societal step to change, Patterson argues, and his thorough examinatio­n of economic terms, policy, crises, and above all else assumption­s proves both pained and heartening.

Cover: A- | Design & typography: A | Illustrati­ons: – Editing: A | Marketing copy: A

 ?? ?? Sharply argued case for economics not being a science at all.
Great for fans of Nicky Pouw’s Wellbeing Economics, Robert Skidelsky’s What’s Wrong with Economics?.
Sharply argued case for economics not being a science at all. Great for fans of Nicky Pouw’s Wellbeing Economics, Robert Skidelsky’s What’s Wrong with Economics?.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States