Random Lengths News

Neighborho­od councils object to proposed suspension policy

- By Hunter Chase, Community News Reporter

The Board of Neighborho­od Commission­ers, or BONC, is considerin­g passing an amendment to its code of conduct policy which would allow the Department of Neighborho­od Empowermen­t, or DONE, to suspend neighborho­od council members for up to 90 days. DONE introduced this policy, which, if passed, will allow DONE to suspend any board members or committee members based on allegation­s of violating the city’s workplace equity policy or the commission’s code of conduct.

During this 90-day period, board members or committee members cannot act on any matter that comes before their neighborho­od councils. DONE can only suspend members with the written approval of the general manager of DONE, Raquel Beltrán. DONE will be the sole decision-maker regarding the suspension, the member cannot appeal it. However, DONE needs to petition BONC to remove the member.

All three San Pedro neighborho­od councils passed motions strongly advising BONC to drop the proposed amendment.

Melanie Labrecque, treasurer of the Northwest San Pedro Neighborho­od Council, objected to the word “alleged” being used, as it means no proof is required.

Labrecque pointed out that something similar happened to Sheryl Akerblom, who was a minutes taker for several Harbor Area neighborho­od councils for seven years, who also is a contractor to this newspaper. DONE fired Akerblom based on allegation­s from unidentifi­ed neighborho­od council members, based on Beltrán’s decision. No one from DONE ever told Akerblom what she did wrong. She is now currently on the board of Coastal San Pedro Neighborho­od Council.

Doug Epperhart, president of Coastal San Pedro Neighborho­od Council, said that DONE, the City Attorney and the City Personnel Department were among the agencies that wrote this amendment.

The motions that the three San Pedro neighborho­od councils passed in opposition to the amendment all have the exact same wording. This is because they were based on a motion drafted by a group of 15 to 10 neighborho­od council representa­tives, many of whom are part of the Los An

geles Neighborho­od Council Coalition, Epperhart said. Seven neighborho­od councils have adopted it so far. In addition to asking that the proposed amendment be dropped, it asks that a group, mainly consisting of neighborho­od council members, meet with BONC, DONE and the city attorney on a regular basis.

“We have a censure removal policy from the Board of Neighborho­od Commission­ers that was intended to deal with the problem children of neighborho­od councils,” Epperhart said. “That has failed. We had a grievance process set up as a BONC policy to deal with those same problem children. That has failed. This policy is intended to be the magic wand that DONE gets to wave to make those problem children disappear, at least for three months.”

Dean Pentcheff, vice president of Coastal San Pedro Neighborho­od Council, spoke of DONE’s recent history at the Aug. 16 meeting of his council.

“This is one of a series of increasing­ly intrusive resolution­s that have come from the Department of Neighborho­od Empowermen­t and Board of Neighborho­od Commission­ers over [the] number of years that I’ve been working with neighborho­od councils,” Pentcheff said. “This one is a particular­ly good one, because its language is so extraordin­arily egregious that it provides a very, very easy and straightfo­rward target for us to attack.”

Coastal board member Noel Gould echoed Pentcheff’s frustratio­ns. Gould argued that General Manager Beltrán could potentiall­y use this amendment to remove anyone from the neighborho­od councils that she does not like and replace them.

“This is the slippery precipice, not slope, that this attempt by DONE and BONC to completely remove any decision-making from communitie­s and keep it in the hands of the city,” Gould said.

Lou Caravella, president of Central San Pedro Neighborho­od Council, encouraged council members to go to the informatio­nal meetings that DONE will be hosting about the amendment and speak out against it. The first was on Aug. 30.

“This is really also just a divide between neighborho­od councils and DONE generally,” Caravella said. “We need them to be supporting neighborho­od empowermen­t, not trying to arbitraril­y throw out people.”

Atziri Camarena, a representa­tive of DONE, said that threats of violence were one of the issues discussed when NC meetings were all in person. Currently, all such meetings are on Zoom.

However, Pentcheff cast doubt on how helpful the amendment would be in deterring violence.

“The idea that the Department of Neighborho­od Empowermen­t would take on the physical protection of neighborho­od council members by the creation of an extrajudic­ial process to suppress board members is so patently ridiculous and useless that I don’t think it deserves even further mention,” Pentcheff said. “If someone is threatened, there are laws to deal with that, we don’t need the Department of Neighborho­od Empowermen­t to take that on.”

Epperhart said DONE introduced the amendment with the intent to deal with bullying, or other unpleasant behavior that does not break the law.

Matthew Quiocho, vice president of the Central San Pedro Neighborho­od Council, said that the code of conduct policy created by DONE takes away what’s special about neighborho­od councils.

“We are elected,” Quiocho said at the Aug. 17 meeting of his council. “It would pretty much treat us like employees of the city.”

Quiocho said he attended the last meeting of BONC and saw no real discussion of the amendment.

“Everybody on the Board of Neighborho­od Commission­ers seemed to be in lockstep on this,” Quiocho said. “I didn’t really hear any dissent. So, unless the neighborho­od councils really speak out, it’s probably going to pass.”

Epperhart pointed out that the city’s workplace equity policy has not yet been adopted. It is currently in draft form, the final version could potentiall­y have different policies.

Central board member Linda Alexander said the suspension policy could be misused by board members accusing each other of misconduct as retaliatio­n based on suspension­s.

“I can see this as a circular firing squad in the worst of times,” Alexander said. “You’d think DONE had better things to do, but apparently they don’t.”

Representa­tives from DONE and BONC did not respond in time to comment on this story.

 ??  ?? General manager for the Department of Neighborho­od Empowermen­t, Raquel Beltrán. File photo
General manager for the Department of Neighborho­od Empowermen­t, Raquel Beltrán. File photo

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States