Rappahannock News

County opposes pipeline

‘Woeful disregard’ for conservati­on easements cited in supervisor­s’ resolution

- By Roger Piantadosi Rappahanno­ck News staff

Though it will have no official say in what apparently will be first a business decision by Duke Energy, and then a mostly federal approval process, the Rappahanno­ck County Board of Supervisor­s became one of the first local governing bodies in the Northern Piedmont region Monday to say “no” to a natural-gas transmissi­on line proposed by Spectra Energy.

Asked during the supervisor­s’ afternoon session to draft a resolution by its 7 p.m. meeting, County Administra­tor John McCarthy’s resolution was adopt- ed unanimousl­y by the board.

Among the reasons the resolution lists for opposing the 427-mile, potentiall­y $4 billion project by the Texasbased pipeline company is the appearance “that Spectra Energy’s proposals were made with a woeful disregard for the presence of conservati­on easements in our county and for the land-use planning goals for the rural area of Rappah-

annock County.”

The pipeline route’s “study corridor” passes through the center of Rappahanno­ck, close to but not aligned with the existing Dominion Power highvoltag­e transmissi­on line. Both north and south of U.S. 211, it appears to pass through numerous properties whose owners have put their lands into conservati­on easements (including, according to a map created by the Piedmont Environmen­tal Council last month, farmland owned by Stonewall-Hawthorne supervisor Chris Parrish).

It also notes that Rappahanno­ck “depends upon the natural, unspoiled beauty of this county for its agricultur­al base and for the tourism that beauty generates and which together sustain a great portion of our local economy,” and urges Duke Energy not to choose Spectra’s bid.

Spectra’s proposed route is one of at least three north-to-south pipeline proposals being considered by the North Carolina-based Duke, which apparently issued the request for proposals this spring to bring fracked Marcellus shale natural gas from its western Pennsylvan­ia epicenter into North Carolina, and possibly points further south.

“An alignment in Rappahanno­ck County,” the resolution reads, “would harm the lives and livelihood­s of its citizens.”

Record cold in the Southeast, utility regulatory changes and the boom in Appalachia­n shale gas created by such technologi­es as horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing — known as “fracking” — has created an increased demand for natural gas in the South and Southeast.

Duke’s request for proposals, according to County Attorney Peter Luke, quoting a conversati­on he had last week with Steve Tillman, Spectra’s director of federal government affairs in Washington, has resulted in three proposals so far — Spectra’s line through the center of Virginia; a 450-mile Dominion Resources route through West Virginia and the Virginia counties of Highland, Augusta, Nelson, Buckingham, Cumberland, Prince Edward, Nottoway, Dinwiddie, Brunswick and Greensvill­e counties; and a third pipe- line further west.

Luke said Tillman believed Duke’s decision on a winning bid would be made by the end of August.

Although the study corridor proposed by Spectra is wider — the company is still surveying, a process that requires landowner cooperatio­n, to be able to narrow down its route — the actual pipeline corridor would be 100 feet wide, and an undergroun­d pipeline, with various abovegroun­d monitoring and maintenanc­e-related equipment.

“Agricultur­e is allowed on the pipeline right-of-way,” Luke said, “but anything requiring excavation is not — no building, no large trees.”

Parrish was the first to suggest at the supervisor­s’ afternoon session Monday that they consider a resolution on the pipeline — primarily to object to its passage through a county such as Rappahanno­ck, where a high percentage of land has been “preserved forever” through conservati­on easements, or on a less-permanent scale through agricultur­al and forestry landuse tax incentives.

“I know it may not do any good,” he said, referring to a resolution, “but I wonder whether it would do any harm.”

“Property’s in easement,” said Hampton supervisor Bryant Lee, “you can’t build a house on it. But you can put a pipeline through it?”

Gas pipelines are regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC); an online FAQ on Spectra’s website said the company would also seek review by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and “appropriat­e agencies” of the states through which the pipeline would pass (Pennsylvan­ia, Maryland, West Virginia, Virginia and North Carolina).

In Virginia, Spectra’s study route passes through the counties of Frederick, Warren, Fauquier, Rappahanno­ck, Culpeper, Madison, Orange, Louisa, Fluvanna, Cumberland, Amelia, Nottaway, Lunenburg and Mecklenbur­g.

 ?? BY DENNIS BRACK/RAPPAHANNO­CK NEWS ?? A sign speaks for a landowner along Crest Hill Road whose property is apparently part of Spectra’s proposed natural-gas transmissi­on line “study route” east of Flint Hill.
BY DENNIS BRACK/RAPPAHANNO­CK NEWS A sign speaks for a landowner along Crest Hill Road whose property is apparently part of Spectra’s proposed natural-gas transmissi­on line “study route” east of Flint Hill.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States