Rappahannock News

Environmen­tal official got gifts from Dominion

- By Grant Smith

RICHMOND – The water might drain from Dominion Virginia Power’s coal ash ponds, but the plot has thickened. Documents brought to light this week show that the director of the Virginia Department of Environmen­tal Quality, David Paylor, accepted gifts from Dominion in 2013, including a trip to the Masters golf tournament in Georgia.

WAMU, a public radio station in Washington, reported Monday that Dominion paid for Paylor to attend the Masters Tournament on April 1314, 2013, in Augusta, Ga. On his financial disclosure statement filed with the secretary of the commonweal­th, Paylor estimated the trip’s value at $2,370.

Dominion also paid for a $1,200 dinner for Paylor and nine other people at O’Tooles Irish Pub in Augusta on April 13, 2013, WAMU reported.

Data from the nonpartisa­n Virginia Public Access Project confirmed that Dominion reported providing gifts to Paylor in 2013. Dominion reported spending $4,492 for Paylor and Del. Barry Knight, R-Virginia Beach, to attend the Masters. Both men also were at the dinner at O’Tooles. The cost of the dinner was $1,236, Dominion’s gift disclosure said.

Armed with this new informatio­n, environmen­tal activists are demanding action against what they perceive as a problemati­c relationsh­ip between Dominion and Virginia government.

The activists want the state to revoke permits that Paylor’s agency granted to Dominion to drain treated wastewater from the utility’s coal ash pits in Fluvanna and Prince William counties into the James and Potomac riv- ers. Environmen­tal groups also are calling for an investigat­ion into the release of untreated coal ash water into Quantico Creek last spring.

“For months, Paylor misinforme­d the public about Dominion’s secretive and potentiall­y illegal dumping of nearly 30 million gallons of untreated coal ash wastewater into Quantico Creek, a tributary of the Potomac River, in May 2015,” the Chesapeake Climate Action Network alleged.

Coal ash is the residue left over from burning coal. It is commonly stored in retaining ponds on site of coal-fueled power plants. Potentiall­y toxic concentrat­ions of heavy metals inherent to coal ash include arsenic and mercury.

“Dominion’s influence over Virginia’s General Assembly has been apparent for years, but now it appears to extend to the same regulators entrusted to police the company’s pollution,” said Mike Tidwell, director of the Chesapeake Climate Action Network. “David Paylor vacationed on Dominion’s dime while he was simultaneo­usly entrusted with protecting the public from Dominion’s pollution. This is a stunning conflict of interest.”

Paylor and the DEQ have declined to comment specifical­ly on the WAMU story. However, the agency referred Capital News Service to a statement DEQ released last week after two lawsuits challengin­g the management of coal ash wastewater in Virginia were settled.

“The people who work at DEQ take their environmen­tal stewardshi­p obligation­s seriously, and recent accusation­s against DEQ’s integrity are baseless,” Paylor said in the statement.

“The quality of Virginia’s rivers and streams has im- proved dramatical­ly over the years. DEQ will continue to write and enforce permits that protect Virginia’s environmen­t in the consistent, thorough and responsibl­e manner that Virginians deserve.”

DEQ and Dominion officials maintain that the company’s plan for treating and releasing the water in the coal ash ponds is environmen­tally sound.

“DEQ is pleased that Dominion has voluntaril­y agreed to go beyond federal and state regulatory requiremen­ts to further enhance protection­s for Virginia waters,” Paylor said in last week’s statement.

“DEQ has full confidence that its discharge permits fully protect water quality, aquatic life and human health. The permits issued for Dominion’s Bremo and Possum Point power stations, like thousands of similar permits DEQ has written in the past four decades, meet strict federal and state requiremen­ts for water quality.”

Despite such assurances, environmen­tal activists questioned the ethics of Paylor’s acceptance of the gifts.

“The decisions Paylor is making now will have a huge impact on the health of Virginia waterways and citizens for years to come,” Tidwell said. “How can we trust he is putting the health of Virginians above the profits of Dominion?”

The Virginia Student Environmen­tal Coalition also

criticized the relationsh­ip between Paylor and Dominion.

“A majority of communitie­s, ourselves included, who organize against these environmen­tal injustices do not have the political or monetary power to send politician­s to the Masters, or pick up their bar tabs,” said Laura Cross, a student at the University of Virginia.

Last week, 35 members of the coalition occupied the lobby of the Department of Environmen­tal Quality in downtown Richmond for three hours, demanding a meeting with Paylor. Cross and 16 other students were arrested.

In 2014, the General Assembly passed an ethics reform bill that limited gifts for public officials to $100. The law apparently would have prohibited the size of the gifts Paylor received from Dominion in 2013.

Dominion officials defended the company’s practices.

“Politics is not a spectator sport,” David Botkins, a spokesman for Dominion, told WAMU, which is based at American University. “Our employees and our company participat­e in [it] just like every other industry, business, nonprofit and organizati­on out there. That’s how democracy works.” He added that “Folks who lose on the policy side will tend to throw rocks at us because of the political contributi­on issue. I think it’s unfair.”

Since 2005, Dominion has contribute­d about $7 million to political parties, candidates, and political action committees in Virginia, according to the Virginia Public Access Project. The week before the 2016 legislativ­e session began on Jan. 13, Dominion contribute­d $105,000 to Virginia political party committees – $55,000 to Republican­s, $50,000 to Democrats.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States