Rappahannock News

RAPPAHANNO­CK’S DIGITAL DILEMMA

Part 1 How topography, density and chance combined to limit local connection choices

- By Randy Rieland | For Foothills Forum

IT WASN’T SUPPOSED TO WORK OUT THIS WAY.

Five years ago, when Rappahanno­ck County’s Board of Supervisor­s approved a plan from AT&T to build three new cellphone towers and add antennas to two other ones owned by Sprint, it seemed as if the county was about to take a step forward in shrinking its dead zone — the sections with little or no cell phone or internet broadband service. John McCarthy, Rappahanno­ck’s administra­tor for the past 28 years before his retirement last month, certainly thought so. By his estimate, AT&T’s project would have provided coverage to about another 20 percent of the county’s households, particular­ly in areas west of Sperryvill­e and along U.S. 522 toward Culpeper.

Not everyone was happy with what AT&T had in mind. At a public hearing, some residents raised concerns about the potential health impact of cell towers emanating radio waves. Others felt the supervisor­s should pressure AT&T to change the design of its towers to make them less obtrusive amidst Rappahanno­ck’s rolling beauty.

But the response was muted compared to the firestorm that had erupted 10 years earlier when Sprint first proposed erecting seven towers so tall they would need to be topped with blinking lights. After much back and forth, Sprint scaled back its plans. It replaced three of the towers with shorter “stealth” silos and another with a fake tree. It also lowered the height of the three other poles.

“The AT&T hearings were much less contentiou­s,” McCarthy remembers. “I put it down to two things — the increasing ubiquity of cell phones in people’s lives and the increasing concern about late-night breakdowns on the side of the

road. The same time cell phones were becoming common, pay phones were disappeari­ng.

“So the board gave AT&T the go-ahead. For good or ill, at the time it was felt we needed to do this.”

But those towers never happened. Faced with an antitrust lawsuit from the Justice Department, AT&T abandoned a planned merger with T-Mobile — a decision that cost the company an estimated $4 billion in penalties it agreed to pay if the deal couldn’t be completed. Projects like the one in Rappahanno­ck no longer made economic sense, given how relatively few customers the company would gain.

Access for fewer than half the households

The result is that today cell and broadband service in Rappahanno­ck is not much different than it was 15 years ago. During that time, however, those services have become an increasing­ly essential part of daily life, whether it’s about teaching students, running a business, managing personal health or just juggling a social calendar. For residents of Rappahanno­ck, it raises the question of how to balance a longstandi­ng commitment to a rural identity and the risk of falling out of step with the world outside its boundaries. No one has precise figures, but McCarthy, who played a central role in efforts to enhance those services, estimates that fewer than half of the county’s households have access to broadband, and fewer than 40 percent have cell service in their homes, a number that drops lower during the months when signals are blocked by trees full of leaves.

That limited coverage concerns a lot of home and business owners in Rappahanno­ck, judging from the response to the recent countywide survey commission­ed by the Foothills Forum and conducted by the University of Virginia’s Center for Survey Research (CSR). Internet service was the top area of concern among those who responded to the survey, with 81 percent saying it’s important. Cell service was next on the list.

Some, however, say those results should be taken with a grain of salt. “The fact that those two issues were on top may be a reflection of who responded to the survey,” said county supervisor Chris Parrish. “I think a lot of people who have been here all their lives may not have bothered to fill it out.” Added supervisor Ron Frazier: “We’re aren’t opposed to bringing in broadband. I just don’t want to use tax dollars when there’s such a split between people who want it and people who don’t.”

It’s true that the dynamics of rural cell service and broadband have changed dramatical­ly since Sprint spent well over $1 million of its own money to erect those stealth silos and poles 15 years ago. Private companies are no longer interested in making those kinds of investment­s, given their slight returns. Today, the onus is on local government­s to pinpoint their needs, map out a strategy, and more often than not, spend public money to build at least some of the necessary infrastruc­ture.

It’s also true that being connected — or not — is affecting daily life at an accelerati­ng pace. “This is a very different world, and a different discussion from even just five years ago,” said Jason Brady, vice president at the Union Bank & Trust, and president of Businesses of Rappahanno­ck. “Maybe not in Rappahanno­ck, but outside of our beloved county; we cannot deny that any longer.”

The great challenge

“It’s becoming a basic need for public safety, health care and education,” said Katie Heritage, deputy administra­tor in Fauquier County (pop. 68,782), where this spring supervisor­s appointed a broadband advisory committee that includes county residents and representa­tives of the business community, and allocated $60,000 to develop a strategic broadband plan. Meanwhile, in Culpeper County (pop. 49,432) , a consultant hired through a $75,000 grant from the state’s Department of Housing and Community Developmen­t, just finished a survey to get a better idea of who doesn’t have broadband access, who does, and how they see themselves using it now and in the future. In Orange County (pop. 35,385), supervisor­s have voted unanimousl­y to create a county broadband authority. They’re also looking at helping to fund installati­on of fiber optic cable and erecting poles that could be used for the county’s public safety network, but also by wireless broadband providers, and cell phone companies, which could lease space on them.

Rappahanno­ck (pop. 7,378), however, has long prided itself on not keeping up with its neighbors’ spiraling growth, and instead remaining a haven of unblemishe­d charm. In truth, many of the qualities that keep the county unique also make it unappealin­g or particular­ly difficult for private service providers — low population density (only 26 people per square mile), rolling hills and protruding mountains, heavy tree cover, the absence of water towers, which are often used for mounting antennas or wireless broadband transmitte­rs.

Even those who would benefit from more reliable broadband and cell service worry about what else it might bring. “The lack of these things has hurt our business. We’ve lost some sales,” said Rick Kohler, who with his wife Kaye, heads up Kohler Realtors.

“But I can see how bringing these in would make it easier to live here and could end up bringing more developmen­t,” added Kohler, who’s also president of the Rappahanno­ck League for Environmen­tal Protection (RLEP). “There are unintended consequenc­es to everything. If we can somehow preserve what we have and still change, that would be ideal.”

Therein lies the great challenge. But it’s doable, insists Joanne Hovis, president of CTC Technology and Engineerin­g, a Kensington, Md., consulting firm. As someone who helps municipali­ties get wired, Hovis is a big believer in the positive impact of good broadband service. She says her experience has shown her it can be a valuable asset for communitie­s wanting to build their futures around small businesses and people working from home.

“I certainly understand the hesitation about not wanting to spoil what is special about rural communitie­s,” Hovis said. “But having decent broadband doesn’t mean the Holiday Inn is going to be moving in. It can be an alternativ­e to the kind of growth you don’t want.”

Expanded cell and broadband service could also affect a way in which the

“It’s not just a convenienc­e. Increasing­ly, this is going to be a concern — particular­ly with our aging population. This is public health and safety we’re talking about.” JOHN MCCARTHY, FORMER RAPPAHANNO­CK COUNTY ADMINISTRA­TOR

“This is a very different world, and a different discussion from even just five years ago. Maybe not in Rappahanno­ck, but outside of our beloved county; we cannot deny that any longer.” JASON BRADY, PRESIDENT OF BUSINESSES OF RAPPAHANNO­CK

county is already changing. Its population is getting older — the average age is now close to 40. Another broadband consultant, Andrew Cohill, whose firm, Design Nine, is based in Blacksburg, contends that expanding coverage in the county could help slow that trend. It could, he said, make Rappahanno­ck feel more welcoming to a generation that has come to rely on the internet and cell phones for everything from following the news to getting directions to planning their social lives.

“I worked with one Virginia county and they told me they were losing all their young people,” said Cohill. “And we had all these meetings, but in the end their position was that they wanted young people to stay, but they didn’t want to change. I told them to pick one. Because you’re not going to have both.”

A case in point: Efforts to hire an intern for the Rappahanno­ck News were complicate­d by the fact that students lost interest when they were told they would likely have limited cell phone service during the summer.

‘Nibbling around the edges’

Perhaps no one appreciate­s the social, economic and political complexiti­es of Rappahanno­ck’s situation more than McCarthy, the longtime county administra­tor. He has dealt with the clear disinteres­t of the big service providers, the skittishne­ss about investing public money in communicat­ions infrastruc­ture — particular­ly given how quickly the technology can change — and the difficulty of getting grants because of Rappahanno­ck’s relatively high average income compared to other rural counties. He also understand­s how strongly people here feel about preserving the county’s natural beauty, and their anxiety over what embracing more technology could do to that delicate balance.

Still, he admits he is frustrated that for a decade and a half now, the county has been able to only “nibble around the edges” in addressing its cell phone and broadband issues. And he worries about another aspect of the aging populace. As a member of the Fauquier Hospital Board of Trustees, McCarthy has seen impressive advances in emergency medicine, how, with a reliable internet connection, EMTs can send critical medical data directly to a doctor in an ER, and then be guided to begin treatment in the ambulance.

“The benefits of being able to provide that kind of treatment are obvious,” said McCarthy. “We’re not talking about your kid being able to spend eight hours a night playing World of Warcraft.

“It’s not just a convenienc­e. Increasing­ly, this is going to be a concern — particular­ly with our aging population. This is public health and safety we’re talking about.” Randy Rieland was a newspaper and magazine writer and editor for more than 20 years, including 12 years as senior editor for The Washington­ian magazine. He also has more than 20 years of experience in digital media, including serving as SVP of Digital Media for the Discovery Channel. He and his wife, Carol, have owned a home off Tiger Valley Road for more than 10 years.

 ??  ??
 ?? BY LUKE CHRISTOPHE­R ?? Lindsey and Trey Cornwell park at Massies Corner — where, as anyone who uses a Verizon cellphone knows, you can make some calls and still be in Rappahanno­ck County.
BY LUKE CHRISTOPHE­R Lindsey and Trey Cornwell park at Massies Corner — where, as anyone who uses a Verizon cellphone knows, you can make some calls and still be in Rappahanno­ck County.
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States