Rappahannock News

A windfall for watershed conservati­on

State allocates record $4.3 million to clean up Rapp County, points downstream

- By John McCaslin Rappahanno­ck News staff

There’s an old saying that a nickel ain’t worth a dime anymore. What did Yogi Berra know?

Greg Wichelns, district manager of the Culpeper Soil and Water Conservati­on District (CSWCD), is suddenly swimming in funding — an unpreceden­ted $4.3 million — earmarked by the Commonweal­th for conservati­on practices in Rappahanno­ck County and points downstream.

“That’s a big change for us because we normally get a hefty amount of money and they’ve given us three times the amount,” Wichelns tells the Rappahanno­ck News during an interview at his office just off Sperryvill­e Pike.

The reason?

The Culpeper District stands out among others in the Chesapeake Bay watershed of contributi­ng nearly 70 percent of the nitrogen pollution entering the bay from agricultur­e sources. The state is hoping that with its increased amount of cost share funding, Rappahanno­ck’s farmers will “voluntaril­y” implement new agricultur­e conservati­on practices — stream fencing projects, pest and forestry management, and plenty more — before the Commonweal­th considers enforcing mandatory compliance.

In other words, Richmond hopes the county’s agricultur­e industry workers and residents alike take advantage of the generous amount of cost sharing monies — as much as “100 percent” cost share rates for certain projects — while it’s here for the taking and before the state breathes down anybody’s neck.

“We typically on average get about $1.5 million and we just got hit with $4.3 [million]. We’re really scratching our head. Do we think we’re going to get rid of $4.3? I’ll tell you we think that is a pretty big stretch to allocate $4.3 million this year, however we’re going to do everything we can to give it our best shot,” Wichelns tells this newspaper.

“The Chesapeake Bay Watershed Implementa­tion Plan III . . . suggests that the Commonweal­th will consider setting a date by which all perennial streams would be expected to be fenced. Beyond that date . . . who knows? Right now, the Commonweal­th is putting a lot of money on the table for the voluntary approach.”

Lynn Graves, chairman of the CSWCD, says “significan­t” increased flexibilit­y, reimbursem­ent rates, and funding is available for more than 75 practices, from stream and livestock exclusion practices and forestry management to riparian buffer plantings, cover crops, grazing land and nutrient management, even cropland conversion to sod — all now receiving “higher payments.”

“The state is serious about funding the program and increasing flexibilit­y to get more accomplish­ed,” Graves states.

“And with it,” adds Wichelns, “comes all of our expertise for free.”

“We come out there and meet, look over what you’re thinking, tell you what we’re thinking, how the program works,” he says. “Our staff then puts pencil to paper and they come up with a plan, and you revise it maybe if you don’t like exactly what they did. We come to an agreement, it gets approved by our technical committee, eventually goes to the board for the full board blessing, gets funded, and you hire yourself a contractor; or if you’re the right person you do it yourself, [say] if you’re a fence builder. It’s pretty lenient, it’s not overly ratcheted.”

Erosion and stormwater practices are other issues targeted by the Culpeper district, especially surroundin­g gravel roads and driveways. Flat or sloped, they all experience the same problems, says CWSCD, especially in the wake of last year’s record rainfall in Rappahanno­ck County that left visible rills and gullies. The district will provide financial assistance to homeowners, businesses, and government­s alike to address erosion, poor drainage, even poor vegetative cover.

While there is obviously much work still to be done in the various agricultur­e conservati­on, management and restoratio­n practices, Wichelns calls attention to impressive progress made in Rappahanno­ck County over the past decade or more, most specifical­ly improving the quality of rivers and streams in the “Upper Hazel Watershed.”

The Rappahanno­ck County watershed, the Virginia Department of Environmen­tal Quality (DEQ) educates, covers 225,990 acres and includes the Hughes, Rush, Thornton and Hazel Rivers. The Hazel River originates in Rappahanno­ck and continues downstream to its confluence with the Rappahanno­ck River. DEQ in both 2002 and 2004 first listed the Hazel and its tributarie­s on Virginia’s list of impaired waters for violations of the bacteria water quality standard.

According to a DEQ report, a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) study was completed in 2007 to address the impairment­s. In 2009, a TMDL Implementa­tion Plan was completed, followed by a grant funded project. In fact, the project was awarded funds that lasted all the way through June 2019. To reduce bacteria loadings, various agricultur­al and residentia­l best management practices were employed through a mix of federal, state, landowner, and private foundation funds and incentives.

Besides CSWCD, groups like RappFLOW, Piedmont Environmen­tal Council (PEC), the Virginia Department of Health (VDH), and the Rappahanno­ck County government formed alliances early on to begin to address the bacteria impaired streams.

The Department of Conservati­on and Recreation (DCR) Water Quality Improvemen­t Fund also issued grants promoting public education about homeowner actions like septic system maintenanc­e and repairs. The grant projects — “Implementi­ng the Strategy: The Rappahanno­ck River Starts Here” and the “Clean Streams Initiative” — supported a stormwater ordinance, enhancemen­t of erosion and sediment control, identifica­tion of zoning ordinance changes for water quality protection, public seminars on water quality topics, and cost-share for septic tank pump-outs and system repairs.

In 2009, the Krebser Fund/PEC also pledged $50,000 to reimburse landowners in Rappahanno­ck County who installed stream exclusion fencing to protect water quality. In combinatio­n with state and federal incentive programs, the contributi­on made it cost-neutral for farmers to fence livestock out of streams and provided an incentive for new stream fencing participan­ts.

At the same time, failed or failing septic systems for 1,346 Rappahanno­ck County homes were targeted. And in 2010, within the Town of Washington (the Rush River watershed), 98 residences and businesses that had experience­d problems with malfunctio­ning septic systems due to aging systems and poorly drained soils were connected to a new municipal wastewater treatment system.

Almost overnight, the water quality of the Rush River surroundin­g the county seat improved dramatical­ly.

For more informatio­n on the myriad 2019-2020 CSWCD programs and unpreceden­ted amount of funding available to Rappahanno­ck residents, contact the Culpeper District office at 540-825-8591.

 ?? BY JOHN MCCASLIN ?? “Right now, the Commonweal­th is putting a lot of money on the table for the voluntary approach,” says CSWCD district manager Greg Wichelns in an interview
BY JOHN MCCASLIN “Right now, the Commonweal­th is putting a lot of money on the table for the voluntary approach,” says CSWCD district manager Greg Wichelns in an interview

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States