Richmond Times-Dispatch Weekend

Man with neo-Nazi ties gets 3 years for bogus threats, calls

- BY MATTHEW BARAKAT

FALLS CHURCH — A former neoNazi leader has been sentenced to more than three years in prison for his role in a conspiracy to target a Black church in Northern Virginia, a U.S. Cabinet member and more than 100 others with bogus bomb threats and 911 calls.

U.S. District Judge Liam O’Grady imposed the 41-month sentence Tuesday after ruling that 27-year-old John Cameron Denton’s actions should be considered a hate crime.

The sentence was less than the fiveyear term sought by prosecutor­s but more than the 18-month sentence sought by Denton’s attorney.

Among the targets was Alfred Street Baptist Church in Alexandria and the home of then-Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, who also lives in Alexandria. The group also targeted the Dar El-Eman Islamic Center in Arlington, Texas, and a Black church in Schenectad­y, N.Y., the First Reformed Church.

Denton’s lawyers argued at the sentencing hearing that the conviction should not be considered a hate crime. While defense lawyer Andrew Stewart acknowledg­ed that numerous swatting targets were chosen based on racial animus, he claimed Denton never did so. The only target Denton specifical­ly selected was a ProPublica journalist who had exposed him as an Atomwaffen Division leader in a news article.

Those swatting calls targeted a ProPublica office in New York and the journalist’s home in Richmond, Calif. The journalist’s wife and child were home in February 2019 when police showed up in force in response to a bogus call from a man claiming he had killed his wife and would shoot any officers who responded to the home.

In court Tuesday, prosecutor Carina Cuellar said the raid prompted the couple’s child to ask: “Why do Nazis hate me because I’m brown?”

In court papers, defense lawyers argued that Denton was becoming disillusio­ned with Atomwaffen Division ideology and was trying to distance himself from the group at the time of his arrest last year, but that he found it difficult to do so because his roommate and many of his friends were group members.

Cuellar said at the sentencing hearing that she was baffled by the defense’s argument that the conduct should not be considered a hate crime. She said he knowingly participat­ed in the swatting conspiracy, and that he can’t absolve himself by saying others chose the specific targets.

“He knew what was going on and that it furthered the mission of Atomwaffen Division and its hateful views,” she said.

And she rejected the notion that Denton, a resident of Montgomery, Texas, was on the road to redemption at the time of his arrest.

Cuellar noted that he told an undercover officer a month before his arrest that a raid and arrest would be good for Atomwaffen because it would increase its profile. She acknowledg­ed that Denton may have exited from Atomwaffen Division, but that was only to pursue his own brand of white supremacy.

Denton offered a brief apology Tuesday to his victims, to his family and to police officers who responded to the swatting calls. O’Grady asked Denton about where he stands on his white supremacis­t views; Denton responded that “I do not plan to go back to Atomwaffen Division or any groups like that.”

In handing down the sentence, O’Grady said: “I’m not convinced that you’ve changed your ways at all.”

But he neverthele­ss gave a sentence below federal guidelines of 51 to 60 months. Below-guideline sentences are not uncommon. Denton has already served about 14 months in jail awaiting sentencing.

Cuellar said the swatting conspiracy went after more than 130 targets and is the largest swatting conspiracy ever taken down by the federal government. She said a strong sentence is necessary because of the effect it has on the community.

“These actions increase fear that people of color have that they will be targeted because of their color,” she said.

The acting U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, Raj Parekh, whose office prosecuted the case, issued a statement after the sentencing, saying: “The reprehensi­ble conduct in this case terrorized communitie­s across our nation, as innocent Americans simply tried to attend school, practice their faith, and exercise their First Amendment rights . ...

“This case sends an unmistakab­le message that those who target individual­s because of their race, religion, or any other form of bias, will be identified, apprehende­d and brought to justice.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States