Richmond Times-Dispatch

3Muslims win case after being sanctioned for turning down FBI


WASHINGTON— The Supreme Court ruled unanimousl­y Thursday that three Muslim men may seek monetary damages from the government agents they say placed them on a no-fly list because they refused to become FBI informants.

The men filed a lawsuit in 2013 under the Religious Freedom Restoratio­n Act, which provides relief from government actions that substantia­lly burden a person’s religious beliefs.

“The question here is whether ‘appropriat­e relief’ includes claims for money damages against government officials in their individual capacities. We hold that it does,” Justice Clarence Thomas wrote for the 8-0 court. Justice Amy Coney Barrett was confirmed after the case was argued in October, and did not take part in the decision.

Muhammad Tanvir, Jameel Algibhah and Naveed Shinwari alleged that in separate incidents they were asked to spy on their friends and fellow congregant­s at mosques in the New York area.

They refused, and later discovered that they were placed on the no-fly list, a secretive government list containing thousands of names of those not allowed to board airplanes because of suspected terrorism ties.

Each of the plaintiffs in the case was uniquely vulnerable to the hindrances of the no-fly list; they all had wives or family abroad, giving them a powerful incentive to comply with the FBI’s demands.

Human rights attorneys and activists say they hope the case will improve awareness of rights in Muslim communitie­s.

“Shining a light on these kinds of abuses, FBI practices, is in and of itself extremely important and kind of previously unthinkabl­e,” said Diala Shamas, an attorney at the Center for Constituti­onal Rights.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from USA