Rolling Stone

Can Democrats Save Themselves?

Despite big victories, there are signs of trouble for Team Blue. What is the party’s best path forward?

- BY ANDY KROLL

Despite Joe Biden’s victory, there are signs of trouble for Team Blue. What is the party’s best path forward?

The following two statements stand in complete opposition to each other, and yet they are both true: The Democratic Party is dominant. The Democratic Party is screwed. Consider these facts. In 2020, Joe Biden received more votes than any other presidenti­al candidate in U.S. history. He rebuilt the “blue wall” of Michigan, Pennsylvan­ia, and Wisconsin; turned Georgia blue for the first time since 1992; and clinched Arizona thanks to a commanding performanc­e in the state’s most populous county, Maricopa, which no Democrat had carried since Harry Truman in 1948. It was a banner year for progressiv­e policies, with red and blue states voting in November to approve a $15 minimum wage, new taxes on the rich for education, and legal weed. And after two victories in the January Georgia runoff elections, Democrats regained control of the U.S. Senate for the first time since 2015.

Yet for all of these promising signs, the 2020 election brought plenty of grim news for the Democrats. They lost 10 seats in the House in a year when they were projected to expand their majority. At the state level, Democrats failed to flip a single legislativ­e chamber in this crucial last election before the 2021 round of redistrict­ing. And after four years of autocratic creep and catastroph­ic incompeten­ce, amid a pandemic he vowed was “going to disappear,” Donald Trump still won 74 million votes, 11 million more than he earned four years ago. Trump’s assault on democracy and reality reached its apotheosis with the occupation and ransacking of the United States Capitol on January 6th — an act of sedition that somehow had the support of 45 percent of Republican­s in one recent poll. Biden won the Electoral College by a comfortabl­e 74-vote margin, but had just 22,000 ballots gone the other way in Arizona, Georgia, and Wisconsin, Biden would have lost. “It was a near-death experience,” Ben Wikler, chairman of the Democratic Party of Wisconsin, told me in December. “A few voters in the wrong places and Trump would be planning his second inaugural right now.”

A close brush with death typically prompts a re-evaluation of one’s actions and some form of course correction. Yet in the wake of the 2020 election, the debate inside the Democratic Party has reverted back to the blame game between the moderate wing and the insurgent left. Two days after the election, Rep. Abigail Spanberger (D-Va.) told fellow House Democrats on a private debrief call that “we will get fucking torn apart in 2022” if they repeat their strategy from this year, urging her colleagues to “not ever use the word ‘socialist’ or ‘socialism’ ever again . . . We lost good members because of that.” On Twitter, Rep. Alexandria OcasioCort­ez (D-N.Y.) blamed poor strategic decisions such as the Democratic Congressio­nal Campaign Committee’s refusal to work with consultant­s aligned with the progressiv­e left and a lackluster use of digital-media tools like Facebook during a pandemic election year. Aggressive policy positions weren’t the real issue, she added: Most candidates who ran on Medicare for All and the Green New Deal won their races. “So the whole ‘progressiv­ism is bad’ argument just doesn’t have any compelling evidence that I’ve seen,” Ocasio-Cortez tweeted.

This intraparty squabbling obscures far more daunting problems that face the Democratic Party in the coming decade. Even as the party grows its ranks in Sun Belt metropolis­es like Atlanta and Houston, the geographic clustering of Democratic voters on the coasts and in the cities will make it ever more difficult for Democrats to gain a clear majority in the U.S. Senate, let alone a 60-vote supermajor­ity. The Supreme Court is stacked with conservati­ves for decades to come. And thanks to gerrymande­ring, a conveyor belt of right-wing judicial nomination­s, and bottomless dark money, Republican­s have locked in minority rule for possibly a generation. Meanwhile, the Democratic brand is so weak that tens of millions of people voted for legal weed, new taxes, and higher wages, and then, on the same ballot, chose Republican candidates who opposed those very same policies. “Progressiv­e policies are popular until Democrats start talking about them,” says Matt Hildreth, executive director of RuralOrgan­izing.org, a research and activism hub for progressiv­es in rural America.

What is the future for the Democratic Party? What can it do to persuade voters that it is the party of big popular ideas that will improve people’s lives? How can it break the GOP’s increasing­ly desperate grip on power, as evidenced by the party’s willingnes­s to shred democracy in order to preserve that power? And what can Biden do to hold on to his 2020 coalition, avoid an electoral wipeout in 2022, and tackle the many crises that face the country?

In the absence of any real postmortem by the Democratic Party, Rolling Stone interviewe­d some two dozen people — elected officials, pollsters, historians, consultant­s, grassroots organizers — and asked what Democrats can do to regain their standing and break GOP minority rule. They offered different and sometimes competing theories about how the Democrats lost touch with their populist roots, the disconnect between Democrats and progressiv­e policies, and what Democrats can do to regain their identity as the party of the people. But they all agreed that the results of 2020 require some soul-searching about what comes next.

Justice Must Be Done

less than 24 hours after a violent mob stormed and occupied the U.S. Capitol, Congressma­n Jason Crow (D-Colo.) was already thinking about how to repair the damage done. The short-term solutions were apparent. Law-enforcemen­t authoritie­s at all levels of government needed to arrest anyone who participat­ed in the pro-Trump, QAnon-inspired insurrecti­on, no matter how long it took. “America needs to see that — the world needs to see that,” Crow says. “These people need to be walked away in handcuffs and put in jail.”

But the more difficult question is this: What do we, as a country, do to ensure the events of January 6th, 2021, never happen again? And to broaden the scope even more, what can we do to ensure another Trump never happens again? The first step, Democratic lawmakers and ruleof-law experts say, is a commitment from Biden that he will not turn a blind eye to the actions of his predecesso­r. More than a decade ago, Barack Obama’s administra­tion vowed to “look forward and not backwards,” ruling out any form of accountabi­lity for the Bush administra­tion’s use of torture or for the lies and deceptions sold to the American people to justify the invasion of Iraq. As a presidenti­al candidate, Biden tried to have it both ways, saying he would not interfere in the Justice Department’s decisions but insisting that any discussion of prosecutin­g Trump was “a very, very unusual thing and probably not very . . . good for democracy.”

But Trump and his allies’ desperate final acts in the period between the election and Biden’s inaugurati­on — pardoning political loyalists, spreading dangerous lies about a “stolen” election, pressuring state-level officials to commit voter fraud, and inciting a mob of supporters to storm the U.S. Capitol — leave Biden and the Democrats no choice. “If we don’t engage in holding this president accountabl­e for the crimes and the impeachabl­e offenses he’s committed,” John Bonifaz, a constituti­onal-law expert and president of the liberal advocacy group Free Speech for People, told me last fall, “then we only feed the idea that the rule of law is being destroyed and therefore those who want to can follow in his footsteps and engage in unconstitu­tional or abusive behavior in violation of the law.” In other words, if there are no real consequenc­es for anyone involved, what’s to stop it from happening again?

But impeaching or prosecutin­g Trump won’t be enough; it won’t prevent another Trump from rising to power. It won’t address the underlying rot in our democracy. For that, we need to restore the people’s trust in government. Government-reform experts say that with control of the House and a slim Democratic majority in the Senate, the Democratic leadership on Capitol Hill should vote on legislatio­n like H.R. 1, the sweeping package of voting-rights protection­s, campaign-money transparen­cy, and anti-corruption provisions that House Democrats approved in the last Congress. Norm Eisen, who served as Obama’s White House ethics czar, says Biden should immediatel­y sign an executive order that would drasticall­y limit, if not ban, special-interest lobbyists from serving in the Biden administra­tion.

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), a senior member of the judiciary committee, says he envisions a three-pronged strategy to repair the damage done by the Trump administra­tion and restore faith and trust in government. The first step, he says, is re-establishi­ng the independen­ce of the Justice Department. Whitehouse suggests creating a special cleanup committee of DOJ veterans. Operating outside the day-today workings of the department, the committee would identify wrongdoing by the last administra­tion and recommend reforms to better protect the DOJ from political interferen­ce. “If you aren’t running an honest Department of Justice, it’s hard for anything else in the government to be honest,” Whitehouse says.

To root out possible Trump-era corruption in federal agencies like the EPA or the Commerce Department, Whitehouse says Congress should launch a special legislativ­e committee that could function unrestrain­ed by the typical committee jurisdicti­on lines. “There should be one-stop shopping for people who want to come out of the woodwork and say, ‘Hey, here’s a file that I kept or a story that you need to hear,’ ” he says. “We now have the chance for a bicameral committee, and I think there was enough corruption across enough agencies, very often with common threads, [that] it’s more important to see it as a whole and deal with it as a whole.”

And finally, Whitehouse says, President Biden should establish a commission made up of experts to investigat­e the fossil-fuel industry’s decades-long campaign to undermine climate science and block ambitious action to fight climate change. “We’ve done a crap job as Democrats and as a Congress in taking a thorough look at this apparatus that is the beast that defeats us,” he says. “Why would you not try to undermine and expose that beast, particular­ly if you want to do something serious about climate change? America needs to know this story.”

Actually Stand for Something

for the past four to six years, the central animating principle of the Democratic Party boiled down to this: Trump is a menace, and we’re not him. Biden shaped his entire presidenti­al run around a promise to “turn the page” on Trump and “restore the soul of America.” In Biden’s telling, Trump was a hideous aberration and Scranton Joe was the candidate who could bring about a return to calmer, more “normal” times, an elder statesman with the experience and connection­s to work across the aisle.

Put another way, the Democratic Party chose a strategy in 2020 that provided an off-ramp for independen­ts and Republican­s to abandon Trump and vote for Biden. It was a choice that maximized the chances Trump would lose but, as you might expect, offered little in the way of support for the rest of the Democratic ticket. And as a result, Democrats underperfo­rmed in key down-ballot races. “Joe Biden didn’t have coattails,” Sean McElwee, a progressiv­e pollster who runs Data for Progress, tells Rolling Stone. “He was wearing a crop top.”

Now, Democrats won’t have the big, bad orange man to kick around anymore (unless Trump runs again in 2024, in which case God help us). They will have to do more than insist to the American public that Trump must be stopped. They will have to come up with something more than feel-good, pollster-approved, focus-grouped slogans (“Stronger Together,” “Build Back Better”) and value-heavy paeans to equality and representa­tion, a living wage and affordable health care, a clean environmen­t, racial justice, and a good education — values that couldn’t be more important but don’t mean anything without policy to make them real. The Democrats need to really stand for something.

The party’s progressiv­e insurgency of Bernie Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez have put their weight behind Medicare for All, a $15 minimum wage, and a Green New Deal, but other factions of the party tend to define themselves more in opposition to the left’s ideas than by offering their own distinct vision. “There’s so much of that in our party — defining yourself by what you’re against, not what you’re for,” says Faiz Shakir, who ran Sanders’ 2020 campaign and before that worked for Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid. “I understand moderates saying, ‘I’m not for the progressiv­e side of the ledger,’ but it’s awful to be defined by what you’re not.”

So what should Democrats stand for? Michael Kazin, a Georgetown professor who’s writing a book about the history of the Democratic Party, says the party has been most successful when it embraces what he calls “moral capitalism” — a system that balances market forces that help people earn a living and build wealth, with strong regulation­s and oversight to rein in big corporatio­ns and ensure economic growth is spread widely across society. In practical terms, Kazin says, this might look like a combinatio­n of what Sanders, a Democratic Socialist, and Elizabeth Warren, a progressiv­e capitalist, put forward during their ill-fated 2020 presidenti­al campaigns: economic programs like free college, tougher laws against monopolies, a fair tax code, improved labor rights, and trade deals that benefit American workers.

“When Democrats do well, they do it by getting voters to unify around a set of programs and a rhetoric that put some muscle behind the boilerplat­e talk about having an economy that works for everyone,” Kazin says. “People like to get stuff from the government, and they like to feel the government is doing something for them.”

The 2020 election showed there are issues with broad popular support that neither party has fully championed, issues that could reinvigora­te the party under President Biden, such as legalizing marijuana. Public polls consistent­ly show somewhere between 60 and 70 percent support for legal weed. In 2020, there were seven different ballot proposals involving legal weed, and all of them won, including in the ruby-red Republican states of South Dakota, Mississipp­i, and Montana.

One of the loudest voices in the Democratic Party saying that Democrats should own the issue is John Fetterman, the lieutenant governor of Pennsylvan­ia and a possible U.S. Senate candidate in 2022. The way Fetterman sees it, legal weed is an economic issue (regulating and taxing it could provide much-needed revenue for states), a racial-justice issue (ending the failed War on Drugs and the discrimina­tory policies that imprisoned tens of thousands of black and brown people), and a veteran issue (marijuana is seen as a much safer option for vets with chronic pain and PTSD). “Prohibitio­n is so much more work than just admitting you were wrong on legal weed,” Fetterman says. “Let’s just get it done.”

Short of a 60-vote supermajor­ity in the U.S. Senate, though, how ambitious can Biden really be in his first two years? There are some in the party, like Shakir, who argue Biden should go big — say, a bill raising the minimum wage to $15 — barnstorm the country in support of it, and if Senate Republican­s block it, tell every American he fought for higher wages while the Republican­s stood in the way.

McElwee, the progressiv­e pollster, takes a somewhat different view. While there are some policies Democrats can pass with 50 votes through a process called reconcilia­tion (like a large clean-energy infrastruc­ture package), the filibuster creates problems for other issues. McElwee suggests a focus on what he calls the “90 issues” — issues that have nearly unanimous support among the general public and the Democratic Party. These might not be the sexiest issues, but if passed into law, people will see immediate benefits. Examples McElwee offers include capping interest rates on payday loans (instead of blanket student-debt cancellati­on), Medicaid expansion (instead of Medicare for All), expanding the child tax credit (instead of universal child care), and free two-year public college (as opposed to free college, period).

“Often, we’re talking about the things that will get the most media interest, and I think we need to, for the next two years, center on our most popular issues,” McElwee says. “We need the stuff that is the 90-percent issue. That’s true for the center of the party, and true for the left part of the party.” And if Democrats leverage those gains into a filibuster-proof Senate majority in 2022, he adds, Biden and his allies can pursue their most ambitious policies. “Once we pass these reforms,” McElwee says, “voters will

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States