Rome News-Tribune

Ga. Power exec: Closing ash ponds will still leave contaminat­ed groundwate­r

Plant Hammond is among the sites affected.

- By Dave Williams

ATLANTA — Four coal ash ponds Georgia Power plans to close in place will continue to expose ash to groundwate­r after the closures are completed, an executive with the utility disclosed this week.

Ash ponds at Plant Hammond near Rome, Plant Mcdonough south of Vinings, Plant Yates near Newnan and Plant Scherer near Macon are among 10 ash ponds Georgia Power plans to close in place by 2028. Ash from the other 19 ponds at coal plants across Georgia will be closed by excavating and removing the ash.

Aaron Mitchell, Georgia Power’s director of environmen­tal affairs, testified on the second of two days of hearings before the state Public Service Commission on a plan the utility submitted in January outlining the mix of energy sources it intends to rely on for power generation during the next 20 years.

Georgia Power’s 2022 Integrated Resource Plan calls for the company to continue phasing out its fleet of coalburnin­g plants and stepping up its investment in natural gas and renewable energy. With the coal plants being retired, the utility plans to spend $9 billion to close all 29 of its coal ash ponds.

Coal ash contains contaminan­ts including mercury, cadmium and arsenic that can pollute groundwate­r and drinking water as well as air.

The U.S. Environmen­tal Protection Agency put utilities on notice in January that it would require them to “control, minimize or eliminate” contaminat­ion of groundwate­r from ash ponds. At that time, the EPA rejected four ash pond closure plans submitted by utilities in the Northeast and Midwest.

After its announceme­nt, the EPA’S Office of Resource Conservati­on and Recovery sent a letter asking the Georgia Environmen­tal Protection Division to review pending coal ash pond closure permits to determine whether they need to be modified or reissued.

While excavating and removing coal ash from ponds would make sure no groundwate­r contaminat­ion occurs, Mitchell testified the EPA has declared both removal and closure in place are acceptable.

“EPA has said both methods are equally as protective of the environmen­t if the performanc­e standards are complied with,” he said. “We believe our designs are compliant.”

The EPD issued a preliminar­y permit last year for closing the ash pond at Plant Hammond. Environmen­tal groups and nearby residents have protested because some of the ash is sitting in groundwate­r.

 ?? Doug Walker, File ?? A run-off bed designed to take excess water away from the capped coal ash disposal pond just east of Plant Hammond.
Doug Walker, File A run-off bed designed to take excess water away from the capped coal ash disposal pond just east of Plant Hammond.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States