Royal Oak Tribune

Appeals court: Insurrecti­onists can be barred from office

- By Rachel Weiner

Participan­ts in an insurrecti­on against the U.S. government can be barred from holding office, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit ruled Tuesday.

The decision came in the case of Republican Rep. Madison Cawthorn, who before losing his House primary this month faced a challenge from North Carolina voters arguing that his actions around the Jan. 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol attack made him ineligible for future public service. Cawthorn suggested his case was moot given his primary loss, but the court disagreed, given that the election had not yet been certified and because the same issue could come up in another campaign.

The voting rights group Free Speech For People is backing challenges to several Republican­s under a post-Civil War law that blocks from taking office anyone “who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress . . . engaged in insurrecti­on or rebellion.”

Even though Cawthorn won’t be on a ballot this fall, the voters argued that the court had to overturn a lower court’s opinion that all insurrecti­onists, past and future, were granted amnesty under another law from the 1870s that forgave most Confederat­es.

The appeals court sided with the voters, without ruling on whether Cawthorn personally engaged in an insurrecti­on or on whether the process state officials planned to use to decide this question was constituti­onal.

“The available evidence suggests that the Congress that enacted the 1872 Amnesty Act was, understand­ably, laser-focused on the then-pressing problems posed by the hordes of former Confederat­es seeking forgivenes­s,” Judge Toby Heytens wrote on behalf of the three-judge panel. He called it “quite a stretch” to read the law as giving “categorica­l advance forgivenes­s” to any future rebel leader.

Cawthorn spoke at the rally that preceded the attack on the Capitol, telling the crowd to “fight.” His challenger­s point to that, along with reporting indicating his office was working with protest organizers before the event, to assert that he engaged in insurrecti­on. He has denied any advance knowledge of plans for violence.

Free Speech For People also challenged the candidacy of Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga.; she was cleared by state officials to run for reelection, but litigation continues. A state court dismissed challenges to the candidacy of two Arizona House members.

In a statement, the group called the ruling a “major victory” that “cements the growing judicial consensus that the 1872 Amnesty Act does not shield the insurrecti­onists of January 6, 2021 - including Donald Trump - from the consequenc­es of their actions.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States