San Antonio Express-News (Sunday)

Biden pushing legal status for 11 million

- By Cindy Carcamo, Andrea Castillo and Molly O’Tolle

LOS ANGELES — During his first days in office, President-elect Joe Biden plans to send a groundbrea­king legislativ­e package to Congress to address the long-elusive goal of immigratio­n reform, including what’s certain to be a controvers­ial centerpiec­e: a pathway to citizenshi­p for an estimated 11 million immigrants who are in the country without legal status, according to immigrant rights activists in communicat­ion with the Biden-Harris transition team.

The bill also would provide a shorter pathway to citizenshi­p for hundreds of thousands of people with temporary protected status and beneficiar­ies of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals who were brought to the U.S. as children, and probably also for certain front-line essential workers, vast numbers of whom are immigrants.

In a significan­t departure from many previous immigratio­n bills passed under both Democratic and Republican administra­tions, the proposed legislatio­n would not contain any provisions directly linking an expansion of immigratio­n with stepped-up enforcemen­t and security measures, said Marielena Hincapi, executive director of the National Immigratio­n Law Center Immigrant Justice Fund, who has been consulted on the proposal by Biden staffers.

Both Biden and Vice Presidente­lect Kamala Harris have said their legislativ­e proposal would include a pathway to citizenshi­p for millions of immigrants in the U.S. without legal status, and the Times has confirmed the bold opening salvo that the new administra­tion plans in its first days doesn’t include the “security first” political concession­s of past efforts.

Hincapi, who was co-chair of the Biden-Sanders Unity Task Force on Immigratio­n — part of Biden’s outreach to his top primary rival, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, and his progressiv­e base —

said that Biden’s decision to not prioritize additional enforcemen­t measures was probably a result of lessons learned from the Obama administra­tion’s failed attempt to appease Republican­s by backing tighter immigratio­n enforcemen­t in hopes of gaining their support for immigratio­n relief.

“This notion concerning immigratio­n enforcemen­t and giving Republican­s everything they kept asking for … was flawed from the beginning,” she said.

Biden-Harris transition team officials declined to comment on the record.

Biggest plan since Reagan’s

Biden’s proposal lays out what would be the most sweeping and comprehens­ive immigratio­n package since President Ronald Reagan’s Immigratio­n Reform and Control Act of 1986, which granted legal status to 3 million people who were in the country without documentat­ion.

Under Biden’s plan, immigrants would become eligible for legal permanent residence after five years and for U.S. citizenshi­p after an additional three years — a faster path to citizenshi­p than in previous immigratio­n bills.

But even with Democrats holding the White House and slender majorities in both chambers of Congress, the bill will probably face months of political wrangling on Capitol Hill and pushback from conservati­ve voters and immigratio­n hard-liners.

Several immigratio­n activists who spoke with the Times praised the reported scope and scale of the bill and expressed surprise at its ambition. A number of legislator­s and analysts had predicted that the new administra­tion, at least in its first months in power, would be likely to pursue immigratio­n measures that would stir the least controvers­y and could be achieved by executive actions rather than legislatio­n.

“I think this bill is going to lay an important marker in our country’s history,” said Lorella Praeli, an immigrant and longtime activist who has been talking with Biden’s staff, noting that the measure “will not seek to trade immigratio­n relief for enforcemen­t, and that’s huge.”

Praeli, president of Community Change Action, a progressiv­e group based in Washington that advocates for immigrants, described the bill as “an important

opening act.”

“If there is a silver lining to the Trump era, it’s that it should now be clear to everyone that our system needs a massive overhaul and we can no longer lead with detention and deportatio­n,” she said.

Rep. Joaquin Castro, D-Texas, said in a call with reporters Friday that in the meantime, he was working on a bill seeking immediate protection from deportatio­n and a fast-tracked path to citizenshi­p for undocument­ed essential workers.

“It’s time for essential workers to no longer be treated as disposable, but to be celebrated and welcomed as American citizens,” he said. “If your labor feeds, builds and cares for our nation, you have earned the right to stay here with full legal protection, free from fear of deportatio­n.”

Harris goes on Univision

In an interview this week with Univision, Harris gave a preview of the bill’s provisions, including automatic green cards for immigrants with TPS and DACA status, a decrease in wait times for U.S. citizenshi­p from 13 to eight years, and an increase in the number of immigratio­n judges to relieve a significan­t backlog in cases.

President Donald Trump ignited internatio­nal condemnati­on early in his administra­tion when it separated more than 5,000 children from their parents starting in 2017 and ramping up in 2018 as part of a “zero-tolerance” policy on unauthoriz­ed attempts to enter the United States.

The policy was eventually stopped as a result of a national outcry, but not before many adults were deported to Central America, leaving behind hundreds of children, from toddlers to teens. Many are still separated from their parents.

Leon Rodriguez, who was director of U.S. Citizenshi­p and Immigratio­n Services from 2014 to 2017, said that “the public attitude toward immigratio­n enforcemen­t is at a different place in 2021 than it was at any point prior to the Trump administra­tion.”

“I think there just has been a lot of things about how immigratio­n enforcemen­t was executed under the Trump administra­tion that didn’t sit right with a lot of Americans, and that just creates a different attitude toward these matters and a different political calculatio­n,” he said.

Ruiz said that rather than simply adding more resources for immigratio­n enforcemen­t, the existing apparatus of federal agencies tasked with security should focus on going after guns, drugs and criminals.

“What we don’t want is to militarize the border,” he said. “We don’t want to demonize and dehumanize and criminaliz­e an immigratio­n process.”

But Lora Ries, acting deputy chief of staff at the Department of Homeland Security under Trump in 2019 and now a research fellow for homeland security at the Heritage Foundation, a conservati­ve Washington think tank, said granting most immigrants a pathway to citizenshi­p would sow division and erode the country’s immigratio­n system.

“Such rewards will attract more people to illegally enter the U.S. to await their eventual green card, underminin­g border security,” she said.

 ?? Barry Williams / Tribune News Service ?? Advocates for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals rally in front of the U.S. Supreme Court in June. A federal judge ordered the Homeland Security to restore the program.
Barry Williams / Tribune News Service Advocates for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals rally in front of the U.S. Supreme Court in June. A federal judge ordered the Homeland Security to restore the program.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States