San Antonio Express-News

Millennial­s not breaking stuff; they’re just broke

- CATHERINE RAMPELL crampell@washpost.com

Millennial­s are a murderous bunch, a generation of homicidal maniacs.

At least that’s the impression you get from reading news stories about my generation.

According to the headlines, we’ve wreaked carnage across the economy with our fickle, selfish tastes. So far we have “killed” or are “killing” dinner dates, hotels, credit cards, grocery stores, cinemas, Home Depot, diamonds, banks, gyms, department stores, vacations, cruises and casinos, the car industry, homeowners­hip and even Buffalo Wild Wings.

The explanatio­ns for our butchery are manifold, and sometimes contradict­ory.

Sometimes we’re a bunch of hipster brats who don’t appreciate the tried-and-true cultural milestones of middle-class adulthood. We spend all our time snapping selfies in our parents’ basements. That means we don’t need cars to get around, nor do we want them.

Or maybe we are venturing out, but when we do, we make more frivolous purchasing decisions than did our forebears. We fritter away our paychecks on avocado toast instead of saving to buy a home.

Or, alternativ­ely, we’re socially conscious, admirably deaf to the siren song of commercial­ism. Unlike those Material Girls (and Boys) of the 1980s, we think ownership is soul-sucking and pointless. Sharing is caring, bro.

Well, a research paper published last month by economists at the Federal Reserve comes to a different conclusion: Millennial­s aren’t choosing to break economic traditions. Instead, we’re just broke.

The report, “Are Millennial­s Different?,” looks at financial and cultural milestones for the cohort born between 1981 and 1997, and how it compares with earlier generation­s at a similar life stage. Contrary to stereotype­s that kids these days have sharply different tastes and aspiration­s than did kids of yore, the report concludes that “millennial­s do not appear to have preference­s for consumptio­n that differ significan­tly from those of earlier generation­s.”

We simply lack the earnings or assets to make those same consumptio­n preference­s happen. Homeowners­hip rates among young households were close to 50 percent for Gen Xers in 2001 and baby boomers in 1989, the report finds, but only 34 percent for comparably aged millennial­s in 2016.

Have the scars of the housing bust turned us away from the American dream of homeowners­hip? Survey data suggest otherwise. More likely we’re just still scarred by the Great Recession itself: We simply can’t afford to pursue that dream right now.

After all, many of us entered the job market when employment opportunit­ies were few and far between, and we got stuck on lower-paying career trajectori­es. The Fed paper finds that millennial­s, working full time, generally have less income than did either Gen Xers or baby boomers at similar ages.

We also have more student debt than those earlier generation­s did.

Young adults today are more expected to attend college if they want a decent job — and moreover, to fund that education themselves, given successive rounds of cuts in public dollars to state colleges and universiti­es. Student loan debt in turn can crowd out our ability to borrow for other purchases, such as a house.

After controllin­g for income, economic and other demographi­c factors, the researcher­s found little to no difference between millennial­s and earlier generation­al cohorts in their spending on housing, cars and food. In fact, millennial­s appear to spend more on housing than demographi­cally similar boomers did.

For now, what’s odd — and especially unfair — is that millennial­s are blamed and shamed for “killing” industries that we’ve been effectivel­y shut out of. We’re not the ones, after all, who bought houses we couldn’t afford and then destroyed the global economy a decade ago.

We’re not the ones who orchestrat­ed a massive disinvestm­ent in public higher education, after the generation­s before us enrolled for a pittance.

And going forward, we’re not the ones who will benefit from the new $1.9 trillion deficitfin­anced tax cut, which was effectivel­y an enormous intergener­ational transfer of wealth. In case you’re wondering who’s going to pay that back, the answer is millennial­s, and the generation­s who come after us — through higher taxes, lower benefits or both. Which is yet another reason for us to pinch every penny we can.

If you’re really concerned about the supposed economic carnage being visited upon carmakers or Buffalo Wild Wings, blame the real villain here: our elders.

 ?? Ryan Pelham / The Enterprise ?? Hannah Breitenste­in, 25, was in the process of purchasing her first home in Beaumont, but, among millennial­s, she is an anomaly.
Ryan Pelham / The Enterprise Hannah Breitenste­in, 25, was in the process of purchasing her first home in Beaumont, but, among millennial­s, she is an anomaly.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States