San Antonio Express-News

Columnist Chasnoff writes final commentary before heading to new E-N role.

- BRIAN CHASNOFF Commentary bchasnoff@express-news.net

On Jan. 18, 2012, I wrote my first column for this newspaper.

The topic — a certain state representa­tive’s unfortunat­e business associatio­n with a bodybuildi­ng personal injury attorney accused of racketeeri­ng — was less memorable than a piece of advice dispensed to me that day by someone I had called for comment: then-state Sen. Carlos Uresti.

His counsel wasn’t exactly original. When I told Uresti I would now be writing opinion pieces, he made me feel a little like Spider-Man — or at least Peter Parker at the Daily Bugle.

“With great power comes great responsibi­lity,” he warned, echoing the origin story of the agile comic book hero.

Seven years later, almost to the day, I am now writing my final column for this newspaper.

A lot has changed. For one, Uresti is headed to prison stripped of his power, having been convicted last year of not wielding it responsibl­y. Unbelievab­ly, I have more than 1,000 columns under my belt.

I’m now moving into the role of investigat­ive reporter — still at the San Antonio ExpressNew­s, a place I’ve called home for the last 13 years.

Looking back, I can affirm that despite Uresti’s inability to heed his own advice, his admonishme­nt that day was apt. I hope I wielded the power responsibl­y. My approach, three times a week, was simply to build an argument, whether about water policy or an elected official’s foibles, on a foundation of facts.

Doing so could be fun or formidable, depending on how the deadline gods were feeling that day. Some moments have proved particular­ly memorable.

There was that time in 2013 when an aide of then-Councilwom­an Elisa Chan slipped me a secret recording, wherein the councilwom­an expressed revulsion toward the LGBTQ community — “So disgusting!” — while discussing a proposal to update the city’s nondiscrim­ination ordinance. Publishing Chan’s unvarnishe­d feelings sparked a firestorm and punctured her plans to obscure why she actually opposed the proposal.

A year later, I was the first to share then-Mayor Julián Castro’s imminent departure to Washington, D.C., to serve in then-President Barack Obama’s Cabinet, a developmen­t that shook the city and altered its trajectory.

Sometimes to get the story, you have to show up to places uninvited. Of all the venues I was ejected from over the past seven years, I especially enjoyed getting booted from the Barn Door, where members of the business community had gathered with elected officials to discuss a pending water pipeline.

“I’m sorry, this meeting is off the record,” a developer told me on my way out — after sharing that the weekly breakfast was founded decades ago by the executive vice chair of Hearst, which is the parent company of this newspaper.

A year later, I got a scoop on that same pipeline when someone leaked a 235-page report that criticized the project and that city officials had refused to release.

Reporters get grief; it’s in the job descriptio­n. For a columnist, the bad vibes are often magnified.

I will certainly never forget walking back from lunch one afternoon in 2017 to find a sizable scrum of strangers on the front steps of the newspaper loudly calling me “racist” and chanting for my immediate terminatio­n.

It felt like an alternate universe — and it was. These were supporters of Manuel Medina, then a candidate for mayor and a masterful and mendacious pied piper. True to form, Medina had led his allies to the paper to protest a column I’d written questionin­g his truthfulne­ss to voters.

I spent the next hour on the wrong side of the journalist­ic equation, fielding questions from media, before decamping to my desk to defend myself in a column.

Not that I’m complainin­g. As a columnist, I was granted the extraordin­ary privilege of a regular space to offer my opinion on any topic that struck me as particular­ly urgent.

In the relatively halcyon days of 2015, no longer amused by the antics of then-presidenti­al candidate Donald Trump, I was able to publicly call him what I believed he had become: “dangerous.”

I embraced this freedom in local races as well. When a Texas House candidate warned of “the disconnect between conservati­ve, Christian voters and (then-Texas House Speaker) Joe Straus,” for instance, I called the political attack what it was: anti-Semitic.

The greatest thrill, though, has been those times when I was fortunate enough to fulfill journalism’s most basic mission: being the first to share informatio­n that others would rather the reader not know.

That won’t change in my new role.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States