San Antonio Express-News

Barr vows no interferin­g with Mueller

AG hopeful cites need for ‘credible resolution’ on Russia

- By Katie Benner

WASHINGTON — William Barr, President Donald Trump’s nominee for attorney general, promised Monday that he would allow the special counsel to continue his investigat­ion, seeking to allay Democrats’ fears that he might shut down the inquiry.

“It is in the best interest of everyone — the president, Congress and, most importantl­y, the American people — that this matter be resolved by allowing the special counsel to complete his work,” Barr said in written testimony that he plans to deliver today at the start of his two-day confirmati­on hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“The country needs a credible resolution of these issues,” he added. “If confirmed, I will not permit partisan politics, personal interests or any other improper considerat­ion to interfere with this or any other investigat­ion.”

But Barr’s written statement also included a subtle caveat, limiting his assurances about the investigat­ion to issues under his control: “I can assure you that, where judgments are to be made by me, I will make those judgments based solely on the law and will let no personal, political or other improper interests influence my decision,” he wrote.

That qualificat­ion could be important because Barr has long advanced a philosophy of strong executive powers under which almost any executive branch decision is ultimately the president’s to make and the president is the

nation’s top law enforcemen­t official, not the attorney general.

After Barr was nominated last month, an unsolicite­d memo emerged that he had sent to Justice Department officials and the president’s lawyers last year criticizin­g a focus of the inquiry: whether the president obstructed justice by firing James Comey as FBI director in a possible effort to impede the inquiry itself.

“Obviously, the president and any other official can commit obstructio­n in this classic sense of sabotaging a proceeding’s truth-finding function,” Barr wrote, noting that the president is not exempt from the law.

The memo prompted concerns among congressio­nal Democrats that Barr might stop the investigat­ion by special counsel Robert Mueller if Trump ordered him to do so. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York and Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, the leading Democrat on the Intelligen­ce Committee, have called on Trump in recent days to rescind Barr’s nomination, saying his memo disqualifi­es him from leading the department.

In his planned remarks, Barr said his memo addressed only the single obstructio­n-of-justice issue and that he did not argue that a president can never obstruct justice.

“The memo did not address — or in any way question — the special counsel’s core investigat­ion into Russian interferen­ce in the 2016 election,” Barr planned to say. “I wrote it myself, on my own initiative, without assistance, and based solely on public informatio­n.”

In his prepared testimony, Barr also said he would follow the rules governing Mueller’s appointmen­t and work to allow him to finish the investigat­ion into Russia’s 2016 election interferen­ce and whether any Trump associates conspired with it.

“I will follow the special counsel regulation­s scrupulous­ly and in good faith, and on my watch, Bob will be allowed to complete his work,” Barr planned to say, according to the prepared remarks.

Nonetheles­s, senators still plan to press Barr about the memo. Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California, the leading Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, said in a letter to Barr that she plans to ask him why he wrote the memo, whom he conferred with in writing it and exactly whom he shared it with.

Barr also said he would provide as much informatio­n to the public as the law allowed about the results of the inquiry.

Noting that they worked together at the Justice Department under President George H.W. Bush, Barr planned to say that he has known and respected Mueller as a colleague and friend for 30 years and that he had confidence that Mueller would handle the special counsel inquiry properly.

Barr said in his prepared testimony that he reluctantl­y accepted the nomination out of a sense of civic duty and that Trump “has sought no assurances, promises or commitment­s from me of any kind, either express or implied.”

In a letter of support for Barr’s nomination, former Justice Department officials including former Attorney General Michael Mukasey and James Cole, an Obama administra­tion deputy attorney general, wrote that Barr, who was attorney general under Bush, served without “regard to favor or politics.”

Barr will lay out his other priorities at the hearing, including clamping down on illegal immigratio­n and ensuring the integrity of elections, according to his prepared remarks. “The attorney general must ensure that the administra­tion of justice — the enforcemen­t of the law — is above and away from politics,” Barr planned to say.

 ?? Alex Wong / Getty Images ?? Attorney General nominee William Barr today faces the start of his two-day confirmati­on hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Alex Wong / Getty Images Attorney General nominee William Barr today faces the start of his two-day confirmati­on hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
 ?? Alex Brandon / Associated Press ?? Attorney General nominee William Barr talks with Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, after a meeting on Capitol Hill last week.
Alex Brandon / Associated Press Attorney General nominee William Barr talks with Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, after a meeting on Capitol Hill last week.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States