San Antonio Express-News

Block deal, and Dems own NAFTA

- @marcthiess­en

Here we go again. President Donald Trump recently appeared to renew his threat to withdraw from the North American Free Trade Agreement if Democrats do not pass his new United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement.

His threats may worry protrade Republican­s, but they are music to the ears of anti-NAFTA Democrats, who would love nothing better than to get rid of NAFTA without giving Trump a trade victory.

Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, has a better idea: Trump should tell Democrats they will own NAFTA if they oppose his deal to replace it. The message should be “if you’re a Democrat, you essentiall­y are voting for NAFTA if you vote no on USMCA,” Portman explained in an interview on the American Enterprise Institute’s new podcast, “What The Hell Is Going On,” which I co-host. If the USMCA fails, he says, “you go back to the status quo, which is NAFTA.”

Besides, Portman says, there is no good reason for Democrats to oppose the USMCA because “it is such a much better agreement for Democrats than NAFTA. … It’s everything that they’ve been asking for, in terms of improving the NAFTA accords.”

Take the automobile industry. America has lost about 350,000 auto jobs since NAFTA was ratified in 1994, which is a third of all jobs in the industry. Meanwhile, Mexico has gained hundreds of thousands of auto jobs during that time.

The USMCA will reverse that decline and bring auto jobs back to America. It increases the percentage of a vehicle that must be made in North America from 62.5 percent to 75 percent. It requires at least 70 percent of a vehicle’s steel and aluminum to be from North America. And it requires 40 percent to 45 percent of a vehicle be produced by workers earning a minimum of $16 per hour. Portman’s office estimates that given Mexico’s low wages, this will significan­tly shift auto production from Mexico to the United States.

“Look at the details of this agreement,” Portman says. “There’s a minimum wage in Mexico for autoworker­s. That’s not a Republican approach, but it’s very helpful for autoworker­s. … The rules of origin, where you have to have more things made in North American countries. … That’s something Democrats have been asking for years.” How, he asks, can Democrats vote against that and in favor of the NAFTA status quo?

Portman points out that the U.S. Internatio­nal Trade Commission estimates that the USMCA would raise U.S. employment by 176,000 jobs. And the Office of the U.S. Trade Representa­tive says the USMCA would result in $23 billion in new U.S. auto part purchases and create 76,000 U.S. auto jobs. Would Democrats prefer those purchases and those jobs go to Mexico?

Or take labor and environmen­tal standards — Democratic priorities. There are none in NAFTA. Labor and environmen­t commitment­s were added only after the fact, as “side letters” by President Bill Clinton, but since they were not in the actual agreement, they are not enforceabl­e. The Office of the U.S. Trade Representa­tive says USMCA “includes the strongest, most advanced, and most comprehens­ive set of environmen­tal obligation­s of any U.S. trade agreement” and “unlike the NAFTA, the USMCA’s environmen­tal provisions have been incorporat­ed into the core text of the agreement (and) are fully enforceabl­e.”

As for labor standards, USMCA guarantees secret-ballot votes by workers on collective bargaining agreements, and according to trade office, it requires the three countries to “practice core labor standards as recognized by the Internatio­nal Labor Organizati­on, including freedom of associatio­n and the right to strike, to effectivel­y enforce their labor laws.” Do Democrats want to throw all that away in favor of an agreement with zero enforceabl­e labor and environmen­tal standards?

Portman says Trump should tell Democrats, “Wait a minute, this is all the stuff you said you wanted.” If Democrats block USMCA, so long as NAFTA remains in place, Trump can hang it around their necks in states such as Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvan­ia and Ohio, which they need to win the presidency. He can tell working-class voters that Democrats voted to keep sending auto jobs to Mexico, and against the environmen­t and the right to strike.

Democrats understand this, which is why Portman thinks the USMCA will pass. “I think it’s going to get done for a very simple reason, which is logic will ultimately prevail.” But logic will prevail only if Trump stops threatenin­g to leave NAFTA.

 ?? Associated Press file photo ?? U.S. Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, says the U.S.-MexicoCana­da trade agreement will get done because “logic” will prevail.
Associated Press file photo U.S. Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, says the U.S.-MexicoCana­da trade agreement will get done because “logic” will prevail.
 ??  ?? MARC A. THIESSEN
MARC A. THIESSEN

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States