San Antonio Express-News

Study: Shares rise for firms that improve diversity

- By Rebecca Greenfield

In 2014, big U.S. tech companies did something surprising: They told the world how few women they employed. Men made up 70 percent of Google’s workforce; Facebook, Apple and Twitter looked similar. The mix was even more lopsided in more senior leadership and technical roles.

Most of the business world has come to believe that workforce diversity is good for the bottom line, and tech companies hoped their new transparen­cy would lead to more equality. It didn’t. But new research suggests that investors were paying attention.

In a study released Wednesday by the Stanford Graduate School of Business, a group of researcher­s found that share prices jumped when companies reported better-than-expected gender diversity; they fell when businesses announced demographi­cs that underwhelm­ed.

The same pattern held when the academics turned their attention to finance companies. A lab experiment demonstrat­ed the same trends, and participan­ts reported a handful of beliefs that explained why they were more likely to invest in companies with more gender diversity.

Google was the first to release its figures, and after accounting for other factors, the researcher­s calculated that the company’s stock fell 0.39 percentage points on the news. They projected that if Google had reported that women made up 31 percent of its workforce, instead of 30 percent, it could’ve added $375 million in market value.

“This is a huge response,” said Margaret Neale, a distinguis­hed professor at Stanford who worked on the study. The group of researcher­s also included academics from the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth College, Northweste­rn University and the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.

They also used Google as a benchmark to see how the market reacted when companies reported more or less diversity, compared with an industry leader. The stock price was “affected strongly” by how companies looked when compared with Google, they found. A tech company whose workforce was 1 percentage point more diverse than Google’s saw shares gain, on average, 1.91 percent in the short term.

After the first year companies released diversity reports, the stocks didn’t react much at all, which Neale attributed to the fact that the demographi­cs hadn’t changed much. “Their bad news has already been priced into the stock,” Neale said.

Next, the researcher­s turned their attention to the banks and financial companies. The researcher­s used data that 50 financial institutio­ns shared with the Financial Times in 2017. The big banks looked more equal than the tech companies: Women made up 54.4 percent of employees at JPMorgan Chase, according to the report; Bank of America was split about equally. Companies without a retail presence, such as Morgan Stanley, were more lopsided.

The researcher­s found that companies with greater gender diversity saw shares rise, relative to companies that reported having fewer women, the same trend they saw in the tech industry. The initial findings didn’t explain why investors reacted positively to companies with more gender balance, so the researcher­s devised a third lab study to try to parse the reasons. In it, they simulated the diversity report experiment, giving a dollar to participan­ts to invest in companies based on their diversity announceme­nts. As they’d observed in finance and tech, participan­ts were more willing to invest in companies with more gender equality.

When they measured participan­ts’ existing ideas about diversity, they found that investors’ interest in companies with more gender equality was based on beliefs that those companies are more likely to innovate, less likely to attract negative regulatory attention and less likely to settle lawsuits, among other beliefs.

Considerin­g the market benefits, the researcher­s concluded that organizati­ons are systematic­ally underinves­ting in gender diversity. Despite public commitment­s, these figures haven’t budged since companies started publicly reporting. This year, Google said women made up 31.6 percent of its company, up just 1.6 percent from five years ago.

“People are not confused. They know the population of women is greater than 30 percent,” Neale said. “If Google moved up to 40 percent, there would be champagne toasts.”

 ?? New York Times file photo ?? Ruth Porat, shown in 2013, served as Morgan Stanley’s chief financial officer before taking the same position at Google. Researcher­s have found that share prices jumped when companies reported better-thanexpect­ed gender diversity.
New York Times file photo Ruth Porat, shown in 2013, served as Morgan Stanley’s chief financial officer before taking the same position at Google. Researcher­s have found that share prices jumped when companies reported better-thanexpect­ed gender diversity.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States