Latin American countries protest Columbus
MEXICO CITY — Mexicans have never had much affection for Christopher Columbus, and officials were being coy about why his statue was removed from the capital’s main boulevard over the weekend before Monday’s observances of Columbus Day, which saw protests in several Latin American nations.
Unlike in other cities where monuments to the 15th-century explorer have been toppled by protesters, in Mexico City the 19th century bronze statue was gently lifted off its pedestal with a crane and taken away for restoration. But leaders danced around the question of when, or whether, it would return.
President Andrés Manuel López Obrador said it was just a coincidence it was removed just before the anniversary of Columbus’ arrival in the Americas — known in the Spanish-speaking world as “Dia de la Raza.” In past years, leftist and indigenous groups have spray-painted the statue on Oct. 12, as well as during many other protests, and had appeared likely to do so again this year.
“As far as I know, they took the statue down to restore it. And, yes, it did coincide with today’s date, but that should not be misinterpreted,” López Obrador said, while acknowledging “it is a date that is very controversial and lends itself to conflicting ideas and political conflicts.”
Elsewhere in the region, an unauthorized march in support of Chile’s biggest Indigenous group, the Mapuche, erupted into clashes when police attempted to stop the demonstration. The Mapuche long resisted the Spanish conquerors, and later the Chilean government, and the march is held annually to bring attention to their plight and reiterate their claims to recover ancestral lands.
In Bolivia, protesters painted a statue of Columbus red to symbolize the blood of Indigenous peoples and also dressed a statue of Queen Elizabeth I in the clothes of an Indigenous Chola woman during demonstrations on what is known there as “Decolonization Day.”
In Mexico, López Obrador both rails against the conquest and has a keen appreciation of history, asking Mexicans “not to take their anger out on statues.” He again demanded over the weekend that Spain and the Roman Catholic Church apologize for abuses committed during the conquest of Mexico in the 1500s, though Spain already refused to apologize in 2019.
The National Institute of Anthropology and History, which oversees such monuments, said only that “the date for returning the statue will de determined by the Mexico City government” once restoration work is completed. There is one other smaller statue of Columbus in the capital, but it is in a little-visited median strip.
Most Mexicans have some Indigenous ancestry and are keenly aware that during and after the conquest, millions of Indigenous people died from violence and disease.
“I don’t agree with having that kind of monument on the streets because I think they represent oppression,” Viridiana Chacon, a marketing specialist, said Saturday as she passed by the empty base where the statue stood.
But some Mexicans fear the government is falling into the same old trap of tearing down historical landmarks, like the 1860s reformist government that fought the church’s immense power and demolished colonial-era religious buildings in Mexico City.
“Everything seems to suggest they want to commemorate the 500th anniversary by using the old methods,” columnist Hector De Mauleon wrote in the newspaper El Universal. “The problem is that history cannot be buried, what can be erased is memory, which is something the government is supposed to preserve, and whose loss it will have to answer for.”