San Antonio Express-News

Election grand larceny cloaked in eloquence

- By Charles M. Blow

In 1890, Mississipp­i became one of the first states in the country to call a constituti­onal convention for the express purpose of writing white supremacy into the DNA of the state.

At the time, a majority of the registered voters in the state were Black men. The lone Black delegate to the convention, Isaiah Montgomery, participat­ed in openly suppressin­g the voting eligibilit­y of most of those Black men, in the hope that this would reduce the terror, intimidati­on and hostility that white supremacis­ts aimed at Black people.

The committee on which he sat went even further. As he said at the convention: “As a further precaution to secure unquestion­ed white supremacy the committee have fixed an arbitrary appointmen­t of the state, which fixes the legislativ­e branch of the government at 130 members and the senatorial branch at 45 members.” The majority of the seats in both branches were “from white constituen­cies.”

Speaking to the Black people he was disenfranc­hising, Montgomery said: “I wish to tell them that the sacrifice has been made to restore confidence, the great missing link between the two races, to restore honesty and purity to the ballot-box and to confer the great boon of political liberty upon the Commonweal­th of Mississipp­i.”

That sacrifice backfired horribly, as states across the South followed Mississipp­i, suppressin­g the Black vote, and Jim Crow reigned.

That same sort of language is being used today to prevent people from voting, because when it comes to voter suppressio­n, ignoble intentions are always draped in noble language. Those who seek to impede others from voting, in some cases to strip them of the right, often say they are doing so to ensure the sanctity, integrity or purity of the vote.

However, when the truth is laid bare, the defilement against which they rail is the voting power of the racial minority, the young and the dyed-in-the-wool Democrats.

In early February, a Brennan Center for Justice report detailed: “Thus far this year, thirty-three states have introduced, prefiled, or carried over 165 bills to restrict voting access. These proposals primarily seek to: (1) limit mail voting access; (2) impose stricter voter ID requiremen­ts; (3) slash voter registrati­on opportunit­ies; and (4) enable more aggressive voter roll purges. These bills are an unmistakab­le response to the unfounded and dangerous lies about fraud that followed the 2020 election.”

On Feb. 24, the center updated its account to reveal that “as of February 19, 2021, state lawmakers have carried over, prefiled, or introduced 253 bills with provisions that restrict voting access in 43 states.”

But it is the coded language that harkens to post-reconstruc­tion-era racism that strikes me.

In Georgia, which went for a Democrat for the first time since Bill Clinton in 1992 and just elected two Democratic senators — one Black and one Jewish — there have been a raft of proposed voter restrictio­ns. As state Rep. Barry Fleming, a Republican and chair of the newly formed Special Committee on Election Integrity, put it, according to the Washington Post, “Our due diligence in this legislatur­e (is) to constantly update our laws to try to protect the sanctity of the vote.”

Kelly Loeffler, who lost her Senate bid in the state, has launched a voter organizati­on because, as she said, “for too many in our state, the importance — and even the sanctity of their vote — is in question.” She continued, “That’s why we’re rolling up our sleeves to register conservati­ve-leaning voters who have been overlooked, to regularly engage more communitie­s, and to strengthen election integrity across our state.”

Sen. Rick Scott and other Republican­s on Feb. 25 introduced the Save Democracy Act in what they said was an effort to “restore confidence in our elections.”

Jessica Anderson of the conservati­ve lobbying organizati­on Heritage Action for America said of the legislatio­n: “I applaud Senator Scott for putting forward common-sense, targeted reforms to help protect the integrity of our federal elections and the sanctity of the vote. The Save Democracy Act will protect against fraud and restore American’s confidence in our election systems while respecting the state’s sovereignt­y.”

Gov. Ron Desantis of Florida is pushing a slate of laws that would make it harder for Democrats to win. On his website, the announceme­nt read this way: “Today, Governor Ron Desantis proposed new measures to safeguard the sanctity of Florida elections. The Governor’s announceme­nt reaffirms his commitment to the integrity of every vote and the importance of transparen­cy in Florida elections.”

They can use all manner of euphemism to make it sound honorable, but it is not. This is an electoral fleecing in plain sight, one targeting people of color. We are watching another of history’s racist robberies. It’s grand larceny and, as usual, what is being stolen is power.

 ?? Jim Watson / AFP / Getty Images ?? Democrats Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock won U.S. Senate seats in Georgia this year, and now Republican­s there and in other states are pushing a raft of proposed voter restrictio­ns.
Jim Watson / AFP / Getty Images Democrats Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock won U.S. Senate seats in Georgia this year, and now Republican­s there and in other states are pushing a raft of proposed voter restrictio­ns.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States