San Antonio Express-News

NATO chief backs Biden, saying Europe was told of Afghan move

- By Steven Erlanger

BRUSSELS — Pushing back against European complaints that the Biden administra­tion had failed to consult its allies over the withdrawal from Afghanista­n, Jens Stoltenber­g, NATO’S secretaryg­eneral, said those objections were exaggerate­d and that NATO had given unanimous approval for the withdrawal as far back as April.

Stoltenber­g also said that talk of a new, separate European Union military force — which some have argued is necessary in the aftermath of the collapse of Afghanista­n — could only weaken the trans-atlantic alliance and divide the continent.

“You see different voices in Europe, and some are talking about the lack of consultati­on, but I was present in those meetings,” Stoltenber­g said late Thursday in a wide-ranging interview at NATO’S headquarte­rs. “Of course the United States consulted with European allies, but at the end of the day, every nation has to make their own decision on deploying forces.”

He acknowledg­ed that the consultati­on was somewhat artificial, because once the U.S. decided to withdraw, he said, “it was hard for other allies to continue without the United States. It was not a realistic option.”

Stoltenber­g is described by those familiar with his thinking as unhappy with the decision by

President Joe Biden to leave Afghanista­n by Sept. 11 without conditions. He had urged “a conditiona­l withdrawal” that would have required the Taliban to follow through on its vow to seek a negotiated political solution.

NATO allies did push for a political process, Stoltenber­g said, even after former President Donald Trump signed a bilateral deal with the Taliban in February 2020 that excluded the Afghan government and set May 1 for U.S. troop withdrawal.

“The problem was that the Taliban did not want to negotiate if the government in Kabul was part of those negotiatio­ns,” he said.

Biden has been pilloried in the United States for his decision to withdraw last month, against the advice of top generals, and for the rushed, chaotic evacuation.

But Stoltenber­g, defending Biden, blamed the rapid collapse in Afghanista­n not on Washington or NATO but on the Afghan government.

“What we saw was a collapse of the political and military leadership," he said, "and that triggered the collapse of the whole defense against the Taliban.”

In the aftermath of the collapse of Kabul, the European Union’s foreign policy chief, Josep Borrell Fontelles, has urged the creation of a new rapid-reaction force of some 5,000 troops or more to be able to handle operations like the Kabul airport without the United States. Other Europeans have called for the revival of plans formed in the early 2000s to create battle groups of willing countries, and some have even resurfaced an older unrealized goal of having 50,000-60,000 troops able to deploy within 60 days for up to a year.

Asked about the dangers of mixing the war on terrorism with nation-building, Stoltenber­g hesitated. NATO’S job was combating terrorism, he said, and government­s and aid agencies made choices about nation-building. NATO tried to provide them security, but concentrat­ed on its own mission.

Stoltenber­g nonetheles­s suggested that government­s should think hard before using force to solve problems.

The failures of Western interventi­on should remind everyone, he said, “how serious it is to use military force and to go into another country.” If history has any lesson, he said, “it’s that it’s easier to start a military operation than to end it.”

 ?? Felipe Dana / Associated Press ?? Taliban fighters sit next to street vendors at a local market in Kabul on Friday as their leaders consolidat­e the government.
Felipe Dana / Associated Press Taliban fighters sit next to street vendors at a local market in Kabul on Friday as their leaders consolidat­e the government.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States