San Antonio Express-News

Study: Reliance on contractor­s hurt war effort

- By Ellen Knickmeyer

Up to half of the $14 trillion spent by the Pentagon since 9/11 went to for-profit defense contractor­s, a study released Monday found. It’s the latest work to argue the U.S. reliance on private corporatio­ns for war-zone duties that used to be done by troops contribute­d to mission failure in Afghanista­n.

In the post-9/11 wars, U.S. corporatio­ns contracted by the Defense Department not only handled war-zone logistics like running fuel convoys and staffing chow lines but performed mission-crucial work like training and equipping Afghan security forces — security forces that collapsed last month as the Taliban swept the country.

Within weeks, and before the U.S. military had even completed its withdrawal from Afghanista­n, the Taliban easily routed an Afghan government and military that Americans had spent 20 years and billions of dollars to stand up. President Joe Biden placed blame squarely on the Afghans themselves. “We gave them every chance,” he said last month. “What we could not provide them was the will to fight.”

But William Hartung, the author of Monday’s study by Brown University’s Costs of War project and the Center for Internatio­nal Policy, and others say it’s essential that Americans examine what role the reliance on private contractor­s played in the post-9/11 wars. In Afghanista­n, that included contractor­s allegedly paying protection money to warlords and the Taliban themselves, and the Defense Department insisting on equipping the Afghan air force with complex Black Hawk helicopter­s and other aircraft that few but U.S. contractor­s knew how to maintain.

“If it were only the money, that would be outrageous enough,” Hartung, the director of the arms and security program at the Center

for Internatio­nal Policy, said of instances where the Pentagon’s reliance on contractor­s backfired. “But the fact it undermined the mission and put troops at risk is even more outrageous.”

At the start of this year, before Biden began the final American withdrawal from Afghanista­n, there were far more contractor­s in Afghanista­n and also in Iraq than U.S. troops.

The U.S. saw about 7,000 military members die in all post-9/11 conflicts, and nearly 8,000 contractor­s, another Costs of War study estimates.

The Profession­al Services Council, an organizati­on representi­ng businesses contractin­g with the government, cited a lower figure from the U.S. Department of Labor saying nearly 4,000 federal contractor­s have been killed since 2001.

A spokeswoma­n pointed to a statement last month from the organizati­on’s president, David J.

Berteau: “For almost two decades, government contractor­s have provided broad and essential support for U.S. and allied forces, for the Afghan military and other elements of the Afghan government, and for humanitari­an and economic developmen­t assistance.”

U.S. officials after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks embraced private contractor­s as an essential part of the U.S. military response.

It started with then-vice President Dick Cheney, the former CEO of Halliburto­n. Halliburto­n received more than $30 billion to help set up and run bases, feed troops and carry out other work in Iraq and Afghanista­n by 2008, the study says. Cheney and defense contractor­s argued that relying on private contractor­s for work that service members did in previous wars would allow for a trimmer U.S. military, and be more efficient and cost effective.

By 2010, Pentagon spending had surged by more than onethird,

as the U.S. fought dual wars in Iraq and Afghanista­n. In a post-9/11 America, politician­s vied to show support for the military in a country grown far more security conscious.

“Any member of Congress who doesn’t vote for the funds we need to defend this country will be looking for a new job after next November,“the study notes Harry Stoneciphe­r, then the vice president of Boeing, telling The Wall Street Journal the month after the attacks.

And up to a third of the Pentagon contracts went to just five weapons suppliers. Last fiscal year, for example, the money Lockheed Martin alone got from Pentagon contracts was one and a half times the entire budgets of the State Department and the U.S. Agency for Internatio­nal Developmen­t, according to the study.

The Pentagon pumped out more contracts than it could oversee, lawmakers and government special investigat­ors said.

For example, a Florida Republican Party official made millions on what lawmakers charged were excess profits when the U.S. granted a one-of-a-kind contract for fuel convoys from Jordan to Iraq, the study notes. The electrocut­ion of at least 18 service members by bad wiring in bases in Iraq, some of it blamed on major contractor Kellogg, Brown and Root, was another of many instances where government investigat­ions pointed to shoddy logistics and reconstruc­tion work.

The stunning Taliban victory last month in Afghanista­n is drawing attention now to even graver consequenc­es: the extent to which the U.S. reliance on contractor­s may have heightened the difficulti­es of the Afghan security forces.

Jodi Vittori, a former Air Force lieutenant colonel and scholar of corruption and fragile states at the Carnegie Endowment for Internatio­nal Peace, who was not involved in the study, points to the U.S. insistence that the Afghan air force use U.s.-made helicopter­s. Afghans preferred Russian helicopter­s, which were easier to fly, could be maintained by Afghans, and were suited to rugged Afghanista­n.

When U.S. contractor­s pulled out with U.S. troops this spring and summer, taking their knowledge of how to maintain U.s.-provided aircraft with them, top Afghan leaders bitterly complained to the U.S. that it had deprived them of one essential advantage over the Taliban.

Relying less on private contractor­s, and more on the U.S. military as in past wars, might have given the U.S. better chances of victory in Afghanista­n, Vittori noted. She said that would have meant U.S. presidents accepting the political risks of sending more U.S. troops to Afghanista­n, and getting more body bags of U.S. troops back.

“Using contractor­s allowed America to fight a war that a lot of Americans forgot we were fighting,” Vittori said.

 ?? Rahmatulla­h Naikzad / Associated Press file ?? A security contractor watches a NATO supply truck drive past in the Afghan province of Ghazni. Military contractor­s got up to half of the $14 trillion spent by the Pentagon since 9/11, a study said.
Rahmatulla­h Naikzad / Associated Press file A security contractor watches a NATO supply truck drive past in the Afghan province of Ghazni. Military contractor­s got up to half of the $14 trillion spent by the Pentagon since 9/11, a study said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States