San Antonio Express-News

How we see today’s ballot; please vote

-

Election Day has arrived.

One last time, we offer our recommenda­tions for the eight state constituti­onal amendments, as well as the runoff for Texas House representa­tive in District 118 and a Judson ISD bond initiative.

Such off-year elections don’t garner as much attention as midterm and presidenti­al elections, but every election matters, and these are important issues. If you haven’t done so, please cast a ballot.

Propositio­n 1

What it says: “The constituti­onal amendment authorizin­g the profession­al sports team charitable foundation­s of organizati­ons sanctioned by the Profession­al Rodeo Cowboys Associatio­n or the Women’s Profession­al Rodeo Associatio­n to conduct charitable raffles at rodeo venues.”

Our view: FOR. Charitable foundation­s of other profession­al sports are allowed to hold raffles. Charitable rodeo foundation­s should be allowed to do likewise.

Propositio­n 2

What it says: “The constituti­onal amendment authorizin­g a county to finance the developmen­t or redevelopm­ent of transporta­tion or infrastruc­ture in unproducti­ve, underdevel­oped, or blighted areas in the county.”

Our view: FOR. The Texas Constituti­on allows cities and towns to finance transporta­tion and infrastruc­ture projects with bonds and notes. This expands that ability to counties.

Propositio­n 3

What it says: “The constituti­onal amendment to prohibit this state or a political subdivisio­n of this state from prohibitin­g or limiting religious services of religious organizati­ons.”

Our view: AGAINST. State and local government­s have a right to limit gatherings — even religious ones — during a public health emergency.

Propositio­n 4

What it says: “The constituti­onal amendment changing the eligibilit­y requiremen­ts for a justice of the supreme court, a judge of the court of criminal appeals, a justice of a court of appeals, and a district judge.”

Our view: FOR. We have seen far too many unqualifie­d judicial candidates who meet the legal requiremen­ts for these posts. Raise the bar.

Propositio­n 5

What it says: “The constituti­onal amendment providing additional powers to the State Commission on Judicial Conduct with respect to candidates for judicial office.”

Our view: FOR.

Propositio­n 6

What it says: “The constituti­onal amendment establishi­ng a right for residents of certain facilities to designate an essential caregiver for in-person visitation.”

Our view: FOR.

Propositio­n 7

What it says: “The constituti­onal amendment to allow the surviving spouse of a person who is disabled to receive a limitation on the school district ad valorem taxes on the spouse’s residence homestead if the spouse is 55 years of age or older at the time of the person’s death.”

Our view: FOR. This amendment validates a law that’s already on the books.

Propositio­n 8

What it says: “The constituti­onal amendment authorizin­g the legislatur­e to provide for an exemption from ad valorem taxation of all or part of the market value of the residence homestead of the surviving spouse of a member of the armed services of the United States who is killed or fatally injured in the line of duty.”

Our view: FOR. We need to support military spouses regardless of the circumstan­ce of their loved one’s death.

Texas House District 118 Frank Ramirez

Judson ISD bond FOR.

We support propositio­ns A, B and C.

 ?? Associated Press file photo ?? A voter shows off her sticker. Get yours, too.
Associated Press file photo A voter shows off her sticker. Get yours, too.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States