San Antonio Express-News

EPA wants decrease in big rigs’ pollution

Agency proposes a 90 percent cut by 2031 for new trucks

- By Tom Krisher

DETROIT — The Biden administra­tion is proposing stronger pollution regulation­s for new tractortra­iler rigs that would clean up smoky diesel engines and encourage new technologi­es during the next two decades.

The proposal released Monday by the Environmen­tal Protection Agency would require the industry to cut smog-and-soot-forming nitrogen oxide emissions by up to 90 percent per truck over current standards by 2031. The emissions can cause respirator­y problems in humans.

New rules would start in 2027 to limit the emissions from nearly 27 million heavy trucks and buses nationwide.

Although truck manufactur­ers are working on battery-electric and hydrogen fuel cell powertrain­s, the EPA says the proposal is not a zero-emissions truck requiremen­t. Rather, the agency says there are pollution control devices in developmen­t that can keep diesels in use and still clean the air.

The EPA also is drawing up stronger limits for heat-trapping greenhouse gas emissions. Current standards would be updated starting in 2027, and stronger new standards would begin in 2030. Requiremen­ts were last updated in 2001, with the next big step coming in 2024.

The stronger new standards would not apply to old trucks, limiting the effect of the new rules.

Environmen­tal groups praised the EPA’S action, but many urged the administra­tion to move quickly on the proposal and then go farther toward requiring zero-emissions trucks.

“We really need to be doing both of these things simultaneo­usly,” said Patricio Portillo, senior advocate for clean vehicles at the Natural Resources Defense Council. Portillo said he was disappoint­ed that the EPA didn’t set requiremen­ts for hydrogen or electric truck sales, as California and five other states do.

He said the 90 percent reduction number sounds good but still leaves a lot of pollution in the air. “The only way to get that out is to get to zero emissions,” he said.

Makers of truck engines and other industry groups said they favor cutting pollution, but they raised concerns that the requiremen­ts may not be technicall­y possible or could make trucks costly and unreliable.

“We look forward to working with EPA to ensure that the final version of today’s rule is practical, technicall­y feasible, cost-effective and will result in the necessary fleet turnover to achieve the nation’s environmen­tal objectives,” Jed Mandel, president of the Truck and Engine Manufactur­ers Associatio­n, said in a statement.

A group representi­ng independen­t truckers said the EPA ignored input from drivers seeking practical emissions standards. The Owner Operator Independen­t Drivers Associatio­n called the requiremen­ts a “government overreach” that will force smallbusin­ess truckers off the road because of the cost and reliabilit­y problems.

EPA officials say the new requiremen­ts comply with an executive order from President Joe Biden to clean up transporta­tion, which is the leading source of greenhouse gas emissions nationwide. Transporta­tion emits 29 percent of the gases, and heavyduty trucks account for 23 percent of that. Biden is trying to cut greenhouse gas emissions in half by 2030 to battle the effects of climate change.

The new standards would bring widespread air quality improvemen­ts, particular­ly in areas already exposed to heavy truck traffic, officials say.

“Seventy-two million people are estimated to live near truck freight routes in America, and they are more likely to be people of color and those with lower incomes,” EPA Administra­tor Michael Regan said in a statement.

The agency says it will offer several options to reduce heavy truck and bus pollution, and it will take public comments into account before developing final standards by the end of this year.

“The EPA has engaged with stakeholde­rs and identified several options in the proposal that address the robustness of the standards, timing for phasing in the standards, options to incentiviz­e early clean technology adoption and improvemen­ts to emissions warranties,” the agency said in a statement.

The EPA also would tighten requiremen­ts for school buses, transit buses, commercial delivery trucks and short-haul tractors, areas where the shift to zero-emissions vehicles is farther along.

Early versions of fully electric semis are now going on sale, and the industry is testing trucks powered by hydrogen fuel cells that generate electricit­y.

The EPA says new greenhouse gas standards could help hasten the transition to zero-emissions trucks and buses that weigh over 26,000 pounds.

Currently, battery-electric trucks have limited travel ranges, and it takes a long time to recharge batteries. For hydrogen fuel cell trucks, there are few filling stations, and pollution is emitted when most hydrogen is made now from natural gas. But researcher­s are working on socalled “green hydrogen” that would be made using electricit­y from renewable sources such as wind or solar.

Under the pollution standards, manufactur­ers would be required to certify that their trucks meet the stricter requiremen­ts or face penalties. The EPA also wants them to lengthen the warranties on emissions controls, making them more cost effective for trucking companies to buy.

The new exhaust treatment systems would come with a higher cost, as would the warranties, which likely would be passed along to truck and bus buyers. But the EPA says reduced pollution from the most stringent option would save the country up to $250 billion from 2027 through 2045, largely by preventing deaths and reducing health care costs.

The EPA said the stricter standards would prevent up to 2,100 premature deaths, cut hospital admissions and emergency room visits by 6,700 and prevent 18,000 cases of child asthma.

 ?? Associated Press file photo ?? Makers of truck engines and other industry groups said they favor cutting pollution, but they raised concerns that proposed federal requiremen­ts may not be technicall­y possible.
Associated Press file photo Makers of truck engines and other industry groups said they favor cutting pollution, but they raised concerns that proposed federal requiremen­ts may not be technicall­y possible.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States